All confirmed leaders of Civ 6 so far

Do you like the leader choices? Is your country relevant enough to get in? As a reminder, Italy will never get in ever and Rome doesn't count.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kongo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No.

Leader choices, I dont give a fuck. I like Teddy Roosevelt though. What I dont like is the cartoony graphics, looks like some iPad game with anal donation system and viral cancerous ads on youtube.

then again, I dont really care about any civ past civ iii, best one imo.

The only think that matters is how they will fuck up gandhi

I do but then they should call it HRE instead of Germany

>Norway

based

danes btfo

>Philip II
Bullshit. This better not take us out of the DLC's at least.

>Cleopatra
>white

HOL UP

it would be fun if you guys got Dom Pedro IV

>Philip II
I am ok with this

Better than Phillip II.

Would be fun if we had Afonso de Albuquerque, who basically ruled the Indian Ocean from just one or two cities, but the memes would never cease.

João II will always be our best king, though.

>no Mexican civ
sad desu

Pls no Russia this time

Why are they all caricatures? It looks like the sort of shit a child would make with a demo of Z Brush

You'll get the Aztec Civ in a DLC

>harald hardrada
fuck that faggot he burned villages in bulgaria with his varangian cuckolds on the request of byzantine kikes

>Montezuma

BIG

>Catherine de Médicis

so are the dutchies coming around again or do i have to keep playing civ 5?

Will there ever be a different leader for India other than Gandhi?

Aztecs are in

>Aztec Empire
>Mexican

Dutch are cut. They may return in DLC or expansions.
No.

I dont understand why they dont use one of the kings of the Antiquity.

Genuinely makes me wonder whether Firaxis know who she actually was, and didn't just look at a list of France's past rulers and pick a woman for 'diversity'.

>catherine de medici for france

greatest lol of all time (GLOAL)

Philip II is doing a wonderful drake impression

Ghandi is black for the first time

Cleopatra is pretty smug

>he says posting an italian

if they wanted to attract iberoamerican gamers why didnt they add incans, theres droves of peruvians urging to play shit in cafes

She fueled the religous war in France, she was a terrible queen regent.

BULGAR COCK IN TINY NORWEGIAN ASSES

India hasn't been a country for very long.

Picking some regional ruler would trigger the people from the other parts.

Cleopatra is greek btw

>Medici
hue

It's probably all they did

the place is full of cucks bending to the SJW whip now

some interview had a fat chick with problem glasses and colored hair talking about removing Ghengis Khan because he was a big meany face who raped

Can't make any more nuke jokes without Gandhi

>He don't know history

>tfw cut from the roster

I didn't imagine it hurting this bad. We're more relevant now than ever before, what went wrong?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka
?

But Norway is in there, you Nordics are basically all the same people, right? :^)

That lad is a top-tier ally in Civ 4
Way better that he founds Buddhism instead of that bitch Isabella

I think they wanted to include as many countries as possible over the course of the series. Norway hasn't been in yet, so it gets to represent the Viking era and steal Denmark's spot. As for Sweden, you were a science civ in Civ 5, so I guess they just didn't need another of those.

adding more

>not charles quint for spain
>scythia
>catherine de medici (again because fucking funny)
>ghandi is a nigger
>kongo not a dlc
>no ottomans (seriously?)


sorry for reddit tier post

I thought they were Diplomacy

>tfw will have to wait to get modded in because too irrelevant

duke nukem is back

I thought they were Militaristic

He seems like a good alternative, but again I'm sure some people would find him objectionable.

Having Gandhi every time is pretty boring, I agree.

Kongo's right there bud

>Kongo

isn't this game called "Civilization"?

I was shocked by the Songhai in Civ 5 at first, but that turned out ok.

Time for us white males to discover about glorious hidden African history.

And Catherine isn't that bad, she's very well-known for jokes, more than many kings (only Kings we know are Louis XIV, XV (in name only) and XVI, + maybe Clovis and Charles Martel)

Kongo, Mali and Ethiopia have 1000 more reasons to be here than Ameriga m8

>family originiated from tuscany and emigrated 16th century to corsica
>but we took over corsica a few years before Buonaparte was born, he's a 100% pureblooded frog

>All those posts about "lel he has a burning castle in the background"
>People getting bamboozled 600 years later

truly ahead of their time

lol wassup mamadou n'dinga

t. Mustafa Mbenga-Kokonkwolo, whitest man in France

No, really, discovering ancient and hidden civs is exactly what Civs should be about
Everybody know about America

At first it was supposed to be a party, but the design team didn't understand the drawings of the lead designers and went with a siege scene instead
They decided to keep it, but Askia was a relatively cool bloke IRL

Give them the Aztec treatment or have again.

Same could be said for China as they have just as long of a history as India, and Shi Huang was already in Civ 4. Same case for Ashoka, but Gandhi has had more appearances.

I would still like to see a 'king' for france, france is such an imporant country in world history it cannot be degraded to catherine de medici

henry IV would have been much better, unrecognised genius

>Moctezuma (WE WUZ AZTECS )
>Maybe Phillip II (WE WUZ part of the spanish empire he also was our king)

>mfw there is not a mexican decent leader

Zapata and Villa does not count because they lead us to something glorious (good or great)

>looks cartoony
>no great first civs bar Philips and Montezuma

obviously will jew out however much shekels this costs because I'm a good goy with no life, but still, it's fucking shite

why would anyone deserve anything good anyway

huh?

Pedro II was blonde

no, no and no lol

having a few buildings and then a ton of undeveloped tribeland isn't a qualifier

Arguably Napoleon was a terrible choice too, because his campaign ended in total defeat and humiliation. Clearly they needed the Sun King, though that might've been too obvious.

>implying
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kongo
Sup Forums appears smart but really don't know shit about Africa

They do. The lead designer loves her and she's a prominent character in one of his board games.
>le cucks le diversity le SJW whip now
Clearly you were too busy shitting in your diapers when Civ 2 was released.
And you really should learn to look for the source instead of believing every shitpost you read on Sup Forums. Artistic works of fiction and falsehood and all that.

When?

Benito Jaurez maybe?

I think he means america is just british civilization while something like ethiopia is its own thing. It's not like we need both west and east germany.

I would applaud this, or of course Peter the Great

Never, hopefully

>Catherine de médicis
>French


Fucking subhuman

Idiot.

He was in Civ 4. Civ 4 had multiple rulers for 1 nation, it's was so great.

Catherine - Creative, Imperialistic
Peter - Expensive, Philosophical
Stalin - Aggressive, Industrious

Irrelevant countries that will never show up in an unmodded civ game unite!

Well at least he's not a wight anymore.

Catherine was horrendus, she caused a lot of instability between catholics and protestants, and by her own actions begetted the St Barthelemy's night.

didn't know, I only started playing at civ 5 lol

Louis 14 would be a good addition too desu

A choice of leaders per country in a DLC or something would be pretty neat desu.

But... Catherine de 12h06!!!1!

French rulers in Civ 4 were De Gaulle, Napoléon, and Louis XIV

Ironically, De Gaulle was programmed with a 10/10 surrendering score
The single highest in the game

>wanting Russia in a westcuck game
no u

>Ironically, De Gaulle was programmed with a 10/10 surrendering score
>The single highest in the game

ahahahahahahahah, that's what you get when you let yanks make games

I want Richelieu, even though he never directly lead France, he ruled the shadows.

I can hardly imagine the combined Russian and Polish butthurt if there is an Ukrainian nation

>Ironically, De Gaulle was programmed with a 10/10 surrendering score
>Ironically
Seems pretty appropriate.

>Catherine
I don't really understand why Catherine so famous, she was just a whore. Almost every ruler of Russia was better than she (especially Peter, who was actually the creator of Catherine's "success").

Sid Meier is Canadian, though. That's why Civ and X:COM are actually good.

Literally no one would give a single shit

Still a shitty meme :(

close enough

Who would they take ? The Cossacks ? Because Ukraine on its own doesnt have much to offer.

That isn't a valid analogy whatsoever and your logic could be extended to many countries represented

yes, human civilizations arise from other human civilizations, we don't spawn out of the ground

Sid Meier hasn't designed a Sid Meier's game since forever.

Literally every barely known nation would be added after release. This is just a new Firaxis DLC policy. They have repeatedly said this.

I watched an actual IGN interview of it you retard

look at you getting carried away with your strawman

He also had a 10/10 spying score, maybe for the Résistance

A lot of AI behaviours didn't made sense from an historical points of view in Civ 4 anyway.

For example, the warmongering alliance of Ragnar/Shaka/Moctezuma that would ALWAYS be buttbuddies and gangrape you
Or the fact that Imperialistic empire (Catherine, Charlemagne, Portugal) were programmed to always make the best decisions available and pragmatically ally/backstab, while other nations such as Sitting Bull are designed to annoy the hell out of you by poising your well, massing huge stacks of heavily defensive military in his cities to prevent you from expanding.

Two AI I remember pretty well, Zara Yacob, the guy that would always be in the lead no matter what happened to him and seemed to be just better at everything, and Catherine, the only AI that could backstab you at the highest level of trust.

>westerns forget that Russia exists and start portraying Ukraine instead
Yes, please, there is only so much cringing I can tolerate.

Not a problem, because Civ games haven't changed in forever

>a medieval-era "civilization" that kept "oral history" and didn't maintain history or archives

good job, good effort