Native americans (including Mayas and shit) deserved to go extinct, because they spent too much time fucking trees and worshipping retarded non-existant gods, instead of inventing cool stuff, like our european ancestors did.
There, I said it, what everyone thinks, but no one dares to speak out.
Native americans (including Mayas and shit) deserved to go extinct...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
But some mexishits built a city pyramid on a lake, how dare you!
Native societies were objectively superior to Europeans
>t. Miguel Gonzalés
>superior
Europeans invented the technology to sail across the sea, to then conquer these superior people's in battles whee 500 men killed 50000
lmaoing @you
It's a simpler culture and quite romantic because of that.
I find it interesting in its own right, same for sami, eskimo, etc
Ethnography is great desu
Why do you think that inventing cool stuff is better than fucking trees and worshipping nonexistent gods?
asshole close your fucking mouth son of nazis , the native culture in america are much better than the fuckin prehispanic euroup culture
>German ancestors
>Not fucking trees and worshiping retarded non-existent gods.
Only Incans worth anything, the rest were all abo tier.
Just imagine building this without the wheel or domesticated animals.
is the goal of life inventing cool shit? what qualifies one way of life to be superior to another? they were happy, weren't they? I'd say that's good enough
4th century bc iberian art, go show me 4th century bc art from injuns.
finally someone gets it
True but the same can be said about everyone north of the alps to be honest.
--south american detected----
They invented some pretty cool things on their own despite being completely isolated to the rest of the world. Europeans had it easy because the Romans civilized everybody and the many ancient trade routes to a significant part of the world.
>Europeans had it easy because the Romans civilized everybody
>Implying romans were not europeans
en.wikipedia.org
4-5th century b.c alphhabet.
No bronze in 1,500ad
No wheel
No alphabet
Sub humans then sub humans now, no coincidence.
>europeans had it easy because europeans civilized europeans
never change, murrica, never change.
While the Aztecs had relatively advanced construction techniques, mathematics, and could process precious metals, there were many technologies they did not possess. The Aztecs had not learned to process iron or bronze. Therefore their tools were essentially stone age tools. They did not have beasts of burden like horses. Therefore while wheels were used in toys, they had not scaled them to carts to enable the movement of goods.
Aztec technology was remarkable similar to Egyptian technology with the exception that the Egyptians had bronze. This places the Aztecs about 3000 years behind the Spaniards technologically.
Injuns are racially 3,000 years behind.
>fuckin prehispanic euroup culture
iberian alphabet
Biggest roast aganist Peru since fujimori
Type
Pictographic and glyphs
Languages Nahuatl
Time period
Most extant manuscripts from the 16th century.
in 1,500 ad had fucking pictures for an "alphabet".
>simple cultures/hunter gathers/nomads are romantic
Never understood this meme.
It's not a really difficult to understand.
Nature is romantic, therefore cultures with heavy naturalistic focuses are also romantic.
There is evidence the Mali Empire sailed their boats to South America before they collapsed.
Some Mexican stuff rivals ancient Egyptian and greek stuff desu.
They weren't as advanced as old worlders because they had a late start with domesticating corn.
>
circa 1200-400 bc
that realism is nice Italy, very nice
HOWEVER