New Stone Roses single is here. Thoughts?

New Stone Roses single is here. Thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/-FpUKTdgWNU
youtu.be/DHoKt-vgFhg
youtube.com/watch?v=Nnfq_sko3Gk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Lmao. British men age so badly.
I'm fucked.

Generic, but not bad. Sounds like a Seahorses b-side more than the big comeback that people would have hoped for. Could have done a lot worse though.

The RYM score is taking the piss though.

Bland and boring, might give a listen to the album when it's out though

Really cringy lyrics, and that's a word I don't use often :(

Just don't have an oasis haircut and you'll be fine

The only one who aged well isn't even anglo ayyy

Блять, гeниaльнaя лиpикa

>muh lyrics
Who gives a fuck? Have you even heard 'I Wanna Be Adored' before?

If you are analysing this song for its literary contribution and meaning then you totally missed the point of this song.

It's not meant to be good. It's just them saying "We're back fuckers"

That guitar riff tho.. nailed it.

I don't get it, aren't these guys like tops 50? They look at the least 60.

>new Slowdive
>new stone roses
>new lush
>new pop group last year

What's with all these bands coming back now? Not that I'm complaining

t. a comment i read on youtube comments or facebook

>implying they are going to release another album

definitely better than slavs
but that doesnt matter because im killing myself before i hit 30

Slav women age like wine though. That is unless they hit babushka mode, jej.

Now look at Thom Yorke.

Woops
was meant for

That's not fair because Thom has the kind of lifestyle that ages you.
He's vegan and he runs, and both are those are proven to make you age faster.
Actually that is fair considering the amount of heroin they were on in the 90s.

Thom honestly looks better.
He would look great if he got a haircut, shaved and started showering regularly.

Let's hope the La's never come back and ruin their legacy as well

theyll be fine

that would be horrible

Bearing in mind that Lee Mavers was such a perfectionist that he recorded the album at least twice and didn't want to release either of them, if The La's did come back and actually released something it'd probably be really good.

Shame they couldn't put together something really special for their comeback. It's not a bad song by any means but it's nothing very interesting.

As a massive fan I'll be giving it a few spins here and there for the next few days but probably ignore it until the next song or full album comes out.

It's not so bad that I'm worried about a full album but it's not good enough to make me think it could be anything more than a 6.5/10

>He's vegan and he runs, and both are those are proven to make you age faster.
Running makes you age faster? Fuck am I glad I'm just a lazy bastard.

If they were to release another album:
>If this is the best song on the album it'll be shite
>If this is the worst song on the album it could still be pretty decent
I'm hoping for the latter

This 100%

If this track ends up being one of 2 or 3 weakest tracks then we could still potentially have a solid album.

Honestly I'll be ecstatic if we get even just ONE new song from them that's on the level of I Wanna Be Adored.

Bland. Worst part is the modern mixing/mastering job. Everything is brickwalled and the drums are clipping in parts.

Did you guys comment on the YouTube video? I saw similar complaints on there.

No, but it's so generic that there's only about 5 things you can say about it. There's bound to be some repetition.

nah i didn't even realize it was up on youtube

the hype train already ended and i dont know why. A Third album is coming that is fucking huge

heroin? i thought it was just coke. i thought primal scream was more heroin

Hahaha this is fucking terrible jesus christ.

It's Groovy. kind of boring, but a lot of their shit is without an album backing it up and creating a feeling

Not bad at all. Pretty uplifting riff and beat and the vocals sounds really good.

It's not Waterfall or I Wanna Be Adored, but good enough. Closing in on 3,5-4/5 stars for me.

3 or 3.5 sounds about right. Maybe 4 if you're an immense fan. It's a nice enough song though. People will call it shit just to be difficult but no way is it below a 3/5.

...

Radiohead were on heroin? Say what?

jesus i havent heard that lp in years godamn

Stone Roses not Radiohead

That picture is more depressing than their mediocre comeback song.

Lee Mavers would blow the Roses out the water if he made a comeback.

youtu.be/-FpUKTdgWNU

Imagine this studio recorded

Whoops I meant...

youtu.be/DHoKt-vgFhg

Satan trips tho

are you sure? i dont remember that drug being around...

I'm pretty indifferent with it. I think the album has a chance of being better than Second Coming though. This is middle of the road while SC was borderline offensive.

youtube.com/watch?v=Nnfq_sko3Gk

Shit, how did they go from this to turning it into one of the GOAT songs? Sounds like a completely different band.

Why come back after all this time?
I understand Suede released a album and people are nostelgic but for the love of god. Don't ruin your reputation

HOLY SHIT
SQUINT YOUR EYES AND LOOK AT THE THUMBNAIL

ITS LIKE ONE HALF OF THE MALCOLM IN THE MIDDLE FAMILY

Last night there was a near-unanimous agreement in a thread that the new song was going to be shit but I didn't expect it to be this shitty. However, I still don't mind old UK bands releasing new stuff, the new Suede album was ok and the new Libertines album was actually quite good.