>Gender diversity is correlated with both profitability and value creation. In our 2017 data set, we found a positive correlation between gender diversity on executive teams and both our measures of financial performance: top-quartile companies on executive-level gender diversity worldwide had a 21 percent likelihood of outperforming their fourth-quartile industry peers on EBIT margin, and they also had a 27 percent likelihood of outperforming fourth-quartile peers on longer-term value creation, as measured using an economic-profit (EP) margin
Nice cherrypicking, faggots. I can name a bunch of male-dominated businesses that went under. Actually, since most companies are male-dominated, any list of bankrupt corporations would suffice to BTFO you.
Christopher Myers
>trusting any statistic without having the raw data set seems like someone didnt listen in math
Lucas Ross
>not considering that profitable businesses leads to greater visibility and that the leftist public wanting "diversity" will lead to businesses hiring women in droves.
Asher Evans
This thread is shitty bait, sage and report
Jackson Robinson
How many of those companies got to the top by being led by women vs. installed women leadership AFTER they became profitable and could afford "diversity"?
Isaiah Carter
The only good woman CEO I can think of in recent years is Lisa Su. That's about it I guess.
Juan Jenkins
Women are put in high positions of companies that are doing well and want to look good,the moment things go bad they are removed.
Dylan Bell
>competent women who deserves the top position is actually pretty good at it breaking news, competent means competent, if a monkey could do better he would be more competent at it
the fem speech of diversity is dumb tho, as always
Jayden Torres
tell that to yahoo shareholders after meyer got her cunt involved
Carson Perry
>Sup Forums on literal suicide watch Marissa Meyer killed Yahoo, so I gave you an example of women running multi-billion $$$ companies into the complete ground.
Now whose company is still functional after decades? Oh right, Bill Gates, MS, male.
spoiler: white
Charles Kelly
it's actually the opposite, women are put in high positions when all the men are bailing, femishits have complained about it forever, which is why i doubt the study
Jordan Stewart
>businesses with money to waste on "equality" are better off then businesses that dont.
Dylan Ortiz
do you even know how to into stats101?
Jason Stewart
...
Parker Edwards
Nobody noted that correlation != causation yet?
More successful businesses can afford to higher more women in top positions
Reverse asinine claim taken from the same correlation.
signed: someone who thinks that diversity at the same level of qualification is beneficial
Evan Jackson
People can make statistics say anything. Take you're nothing burger and go home Dianne
Blake Baker
The solution was so simple all along... We must get a woman to run ms
Christopher Rodriguez
and we can list countless male-dominated companies that are thriving and have created the very fabric of civilization of which we come from.
Name a single female dominated company (that also started out as a female dominated company) that has had as much of an impact on the world as say... i don't know, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Pfizer, Ford, Johnson & Johnson, GE, etc etc
I wont hold my breath though.
Kevin Cooper
>another woman-worshipping cuck thread Get fucked faggots. Sage.
Ryder Perez
>Pajeet in charge of Microsoft >Pajeet in charge of Google >both are skyrocketing in $$$ growth Sup Forums on double literal suicide watch
Noah Mitchell
>correlated >correlation correlation != causation
Luke Collins
I do, that's precisely why I care more about a peer-reviewed large-sampled study than I care about a couple of cherrypicked anecdotal cases.
Daniel Hill
Chocolate Chip cookies
Landon Morris
So having women is 79% likely to cause under performance?
Jose Hill
>cherrypicking This study
Just say young companies had better performance and more women as executives.
Anthony Taylor
What does this "prove"?
Correlation doesn't imply causation. It could very well be that companies that are already successful want to score PR points by appointing more women. And those that aren't as successful don't think it's worth hiring women just for the sake of PR, when they have way bigger issues to confront than mah diversity hiring. They can't afford this culture of identity politics when they're barely on a floating line.
Evan Morris
A better study would have shown that those companies became more successful after hiring more women in management positions.
Showing a correlation post-factum doesn't prove much.
John Wright
>getting this triggered by a thread transparently meant to bait Sup Forumstards like yourself you're only encouraging the OP to post these more often.