Why we can't just encrypt everything?

Why we can't just encrypt everything?

Attached: 1515119995068.gif (480x264, 1.54M)

series of tubes.

Encrypt yourself.

Who says we can't?

We are doing so, it just takes time

That requires too many ICO's.

the us govt would like to have a word with you

encryption will be illegal soon

>online commerce/banking will be illegal soon
um no sweetie

> unauthorised encryption is not allowed

ENCRYPT THE ENCRYPTION!

>oi do you have an encryption loicense?
>bin that cipher you cheeky cunt!

kek

Attached: 1493403236517.jpg (852x1041, 161K)

Attached: 1450388746341.png (499x499, 81K)

i actually did - i keep my truecrypt containers inside my veracrypt containers for double protection

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 8K)

One type needs a shared secret and the other leaves "clues" lying around, or even broadcasts them

Wait, why not make everything merkle trees? Firmware, kernel, OS, everything.

KPNNO BVPWE KMN

>encrypt root and home harddrive
>encrypt external hdds
>encrypt backup hdd
>encrypt backup on backup hdd
>encrypt phone
>encrypt dns requested
>pass gpg key is 32 chars long
>master password for root is 24 chars
How am I doing guys?

Now I want to know how many times you have to encrypt shit for it to make sense again.

Attached: 🤔.gif (468x237, 1.52M)

encrypt master password for key with gpg key
encrypt gpg key with encrypted master password

>encrypt master password with random nonce
plebs, get on my level

We can, every computer/connection in my home is encryptededed [cool][cześć]

are you using argon2 yet?

>all my thoughts are naturally encrypted since childhood
>happens in my brain
>mfw my master password is contained in secure medicine pills I have to ingest everyday to access the meaning of the world.

Attached: pol meeting 4.jpg (4032x3024, 1.98M)

No, plain sha512

>Wearing two condoms

Each container has different passwords, so double the bruteforce work for the aggressor.

That's pretty autistic.

>>master password for root is 24 chars
and your sudo password is 123456

>a bunch of ridiculous, larping kids

the true image of america

You can, but there's no known solution to have the metadata encrypted as well. For example if you need to send a message from your computer to your friend's computer, how do the computers in the middle perform the routing if they can't read the metadata? Things like Tor split up the metadata between multiple people to make it very hard to piece it back together, but it's still not a hard solution like some kind of magical metadata encryption would be.

>Things like Tor split up the metadata between multiple people to make it very hard to piece it back together, but it's still not a hard solution like some kind of magical metadata encryption would be.

>2018
>still no good solution for anonymous routing

What if they just do rubberhose? Multiple nested containers make sense when numerous people must be present to open.

that is futile

Attached: 1_OlY_7egaXZYKJu3QZYmANA.jpg (840x348, 82K)

You could modify the regular Internet to limit information available to each node to the previous and next node like Tor, but that would require a huge change of how the Internet's infrastructure works (and would have less efficient routing) for basically no upside to ISPs or regular customers. You'd also still have to trust your ISP to actually implement it properly and delete logs so they couldn't piece connections back together later.

It's a normal English word, but it doesn't really matter. If someone gets his hands on my computer while its unencrypted it doesn't really matter anymore anyways

>heres a tip, son
>dont use encryption!

Are you implying that double encryption is less secure?

>encrypt everything
>including the decryption keys
>need to make decryption keys to decrypt encrypted decryption keys
>lose the decryption encryption keys
>everything remains encrypted forever

>that lone woman on the far left

How awkward do you think that meetup was?