ITT: Times critics were very, very wrong.
ITT: Times critics were very, very wrong
Other urls found in this thread:
>implying scaruffi was ever right
scaruffi is good for recs but that's it
>66600
>scaruffi is worse than the devil
>implying he was ever wrong
I bet you like The Beatles.
butthurt radiofags
>NMC Award For Music Taste
kek
>tfw no one here will get the NMC Award For Music Taste
What instrument do you and Scruffy play?
>implying he's ever wrong
I play violin and piano, I think Scaruffi used to play the guitar.
>I play violin and piano
Oh then you'd know that The Beatles were advanced compositionally?
>I think Scaruffi used to play the guitar.
Prove it.
The fact that...
>Oh then you'd know that The Beatles were advanced compositionally?
loool, no, just no.
I mean maybe for pop music, yes, but compared to classical music? or even jazz? no way.
trip-dubs confirm
Scaruffi is always wrong
>I mean maybe for pop music, yes, but compared to classical music? or even jazz?
Well seeming as Beatles songs were covered by orchestras and many jazz musicians...
I bet you're misinformation and ill-fed opinion fans.
Scaruffi was once asked about his reviews, and his reply? "It's just music, it makes me yawn" (paraphrase).
Can't you tell he's qualified to talk about music?
The skin flute.
>listening to only certain kinds of music because it's "better" than all other kinds of music
I'm lmaoing at ur life
...
Literally autistic pretentiousness in one post.
Ooops you meant to quote and Sorry about that!
>Oh then you'd know that The Beatles were advanced compositionally?
non-sequitur
How so?
You're right, I did mean to quote Sorry
...