ITT: generic albums
ITT: generic albums
good album
...
if you have no prior experience with psych-rock/pop, yes
...
...
nah it's decent regardless
How is that generic? It's one of the more interesting nu-gaze albums as it isn't just Loveless 10.0
...
it's a dream pop album though
>ITT: generic b8
ftfy
neo psych and shoegaze too, it would be inaccurate to call it just a 'dream pop' album
To me the most amazing thing about this album is how much it sounds like its cover
why does that amaze you
b8 aside, the only way I can think anyone would find this generic is if he only listened to looped recordings of his own, highly reverbed farts
>le all nu-gaze albums are all Loveless 2.0 meme
Stop. Also, C&C sounds just like Loveless + a pineapple.
Because I have once or twice attempted to create art so that it looks like a piece of music, and failed pretty hard.
Also I don't know any other album that sounds (to me) exacty like its cover art
...
No it doesn't. It's hazy like Loveless but that's about it. Loveless has more of a focus on guitar work while C&C is more about atmosphere.
lol, nice
You take that back.
...
...
...
...
Anything DIIV has made
You fucking potato!
...
They're a bit boring but I wouldn't call it generic, Diiv is easily recognisable from other shoegaze.
The worst part is that you think i'm memeing.
I agree so much with this one
this
hit me with essential psycho pop/rock
Talk about fucking generic
(You)
(You)
(You)
really now
>spoonfeed me
you have wifi
why are you so upset someone doesnt agree with you?
yes
name 15 albums like it that came before
just because you produce a unique piece of shit, doesn't mean its good senpai.
Charles Manson, Phil Spector, the list goes on
well actually it does
Kill yourself
Ah yes but the thread title is 'generic' albums, dumbass.
kek.
What a great argument