ITT: generic albums

ITT: generic albums

good album

...

if you have no prior experience with psych-rock/pop, yes

...

...

nah it's decent regardless

How is that generic? It's one of the more interesting nu-gaze albums as it isn't just Loveless 10.0

...

it's a dream pop album though

>ITT: generic b8
ftfy

neo psych and shoegaze too, it would be inaccurate to call it just a 'dream pop' album

To me the most amazing thing about this album is how much it sounds like its cover

why does that amaze you

b8 aside, the only way I can think anyone would find this generic is if he only listened to looped recordings of his own, highly reverbed farts

>le all nu-gaze albums are all Loveless 2.0 meme
Stop. Also, C&C sounds just like Loveless + a pineapple.

Because I have once or twice attempted to create art so that it looks like a piece of music, and failed pretty hard.
Also I don't know any other album that sounds (to me) exacty like its cover art

...

No it doesn't. It's hazy like Loveless but that's about it. Loveless has more of a focus on guitar work while C&C is more about atmosphere.

lol, nice

You take that back.

...

...

...

...

Anything DIIV has made

You fucking potato!

...

They're a bit boring but I wouldn't call it generic, Diiv is easily recognisable from other shoegaze.

The worst part is that you think i'm memeing.

I agree so much with this one
this

hit me with essential psycho pop/rock

Talk about fucking generic

(You)
(You)
(You)

really now

>spoonfeed me
you have wifi

why are you so upset someone doesnt agree with you?

yes

name 15 albums like it that came before

just because you produce a unique piece of shit, doesn't mean its good senpai.

Charles Manson, Phil Spector, the list goes on

well actually it does

Kill yourself

Ah yes but the thread title is 'generic' albums, dumbass.

kek.

What a great argument