Be hardcore punk

>Be hardcore punk
>If they aren't from the 70's they aren't real punk no matter what they sound like
>Fuck any band who's been seen by more than 25 people, fucking commercial sell outs
>Be able to fall asleep at night knowing you're smarter than everyone else who liked punk groups from the 90's
>feelspunkman.jpg

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_rock
youtube.com/watch?v=ChXbgu0ELT4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Punk groups from the 90's
There were good ones?

in the meantime people with taste have long since realized punk was an error in musical history, one of those genres that produced no good music, like chiptune, djent, wizard rock et al

this is bait and 80s punk>60s punk>70s punk>90s punk

>muh musical complexity
>muh mainstream

>defending a commiefied, whitened rehash of the dead horse of rocknroll under pretext of slightly more distorted geetahs

lmao

>muh musical complexity
You say that as if someone should be proud they can only play power chords and barely sing on key over them.
Sounds like you've just got a shit underdeveloped palate.

Yeah, it's not like punk is a unique genre that spawned from the counterculture that went on to inspire the alternative rock revolution of the 1990's. Yeah, irrelevant trash.

>non-musical bullshit

see

The point was the disdain of the counterculture towards social norms, and their instrumentation reflected that. Raw, melodic, simple.

>Fact dodge

that's what you did by involving all kinds of stuff that has nothing to do with music. are you going to talk about your cats next?

70s punk>80s punk>90s punk
btw does anyone know any good 90s punk bands

Why do the shittiest genres always have the most pretentious, circle-jerking, know-it-all fanbases?

>wizard rock
What does this mean? Im interested.

Yeah punk is ironically really conservative
The movement never really delivered on the promise that anyone could make whatever music they want and still be accepted

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_rock

you're going to wish you didn't ask though

I love punk as a genre, I admire its evolution despite being below the radar of the mainstream mostly, and it's DIY culture. But, people like the OP is talking about are fucking cancer.

What? I stated punk rock's direct influence in an extremely important era of rock music. How is that unrelated?

Any new punk bands you would recommend?

you didn't say that, you merely stated they originated from the same "counterculture". also, there is not good rock post-'76 so I have no idea what the fuck your point was supposed to be

see

Fuck no, punk is looking real fucked right now. I dig Rise Against, but that's about it, they aren't very new.

That's probably why it's more interesting as a cultural movement than a musical one.
Also:
>melodic
>punk
By what standard? It's hardly got better melody writing than the rest of rock music. The majority of punk has either tenuous or boringly simple melody in punk. As you said though, that's the point.

Oooohhhh so you're in that vein of hipster faggotry where you think your opinion is more superior than everyone else's. Alternative rock reached its pinnacle in the 1990's, which I already told you was directly inspired by punk. No good music after '76? That's fucking autistic.

hell yeah im a hardcoer punk

no good ROCK after '76, I didn't say no good music. But yeah enjoy your nickelback man

Wow that's disappointing. I was hoping it was an extension of crazy 70s prog.

At least i learned something on mu for once.

It's the most barebones components of music that people enjoy. It's why people with no edge musically at all today, like fucking Ed Sheeran can have a career. Just being able to create good melodies.

Even so, that's what I meant, rock. You're fucking crazy. The 90's were a golden age in rock music.

What age are you?

Confirmed for not being into punk
90s powerviolence was based

>The 90's were a golden age in rock music.
lol

I'm not into Ed Sheeran, it's fucking pleb music. But musically, you have to see other viewpoints, and understand why people listen to shit like that. The only reason people like him is not because he's done anything original or interesting, but because he can write good vocal melodies. It was just an example.

powerviolence is more metal than punk

shut ur mouth

Fact. It was the pinnacle of rock music in the mainstream, and for good reason.

The latter half of the 90s sucked for hard rock though

>Wizard rock (sometimes shortened as Wrock) is a genre of rock music that developed between 2002 and 2004 in the United States. Wizard rock bands are characterized by their performances and humorous songs about the Harry Potter universe.
What is this bullshit?

could grunge fans please leave Sup Forums thank you very much

Charles Bronson
H20
Dropdead

the list goes on

Oh yeah, I'm just some faggot that likes nirvana. If you think the 90's were solely about grunge you're fucking autistic.

Fact. Still, with the influx of original material in the 90's, that can't really devalue the 90's importance.

Except it literally isn't at all shut the fuck up

Charles Bronson is so entry level 90s HC
youtube.com/watch?v=ChXbgu0ELT4

What age are you?

As much as I'm sure you want Detroit bands to be 60s punk, they just aren't.

What does it matter? So you can generalize me, effectively avoiding the responsibility of having to use factual evidence to prove me wrong here? I could be 15 or 42, it doesn't matter.

>What does it matter?
You need to be 18 to post on this site.

But if you're really interested:
>It's the most barebones components of music that people enjoy.
Minimalism, ambient music, noise, etc. all feature more simple and stripped back music and have plenty of fans.
>Ed Sheeran
Pop stars of the day don't have very much relevance on a board like this because most people know enough about music to know the mainstream has always been mostly shit and every decade has it's Ed Sheerans who dominate the mainstream of their day but who get forgotten over time.
>The only reason people like him is not because he's done anything original
Originality isn't a reason to like or dislike something and is only really relevant in a discussion about musical history and culture. Personal preference is determined by your palate which is largely separate from the context something was recorded in. If someone played you two pieces of music from a style you know nothing about, you're probably not going to be able to tell which one of them did x thing first and it has very little bearing on your experience.
> or interesting
Well that's subjective but you say yourself that he writes good melodies so I'm not really sure why you're saying you don't think he's interesting.

>punk
>Rise Against

my sides

>hi i know nothing about what im talking about, but want to seem cool on Sup Forums

the monks, the sonics, mc5, early stooges especially were punk

youre a retard

These bands all influenced punk. They were not punk.

I suppose the Velvet Underground and the New York Dolls are punk rock too.

What age are you?

I can respect someone like him in that regard, but for me, that doesn't make his music good. See, people tend to shut off the world evolving around them. They are stubborn, and stay in their little bubble of opinion. Ed Sheeran is relevant somehow. You can't say oh his music sucks so fuck everyone that likes him, that's not progressive at all. You have to ask why they are relevant in the mainstream, and that reason has to be linked to their sound. Mu/ is fucked, because collectively we're ignorant, and pretend like what we don't like isn't relevant somehow. That's why we all act like we want to see the world burn, because we refuse to take things in that we don't like.

My favorite 60's punk bands are The Beatles, The Kinks and The Who

What age are you?

>chiptune
You leave Anamanaguchi out of this

What age are you?

...

What age are you?