How is this album even remotely close to 8/10?

How is this album even remotely close to 8/10?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GjwRIjrC4io
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Whose rating is that

Better than Deakins new album according to p4k

>not knowing pitchfork's rating system is extremely inflated before making a shitting thread about a mediocre album getting too high of a score
Lad

It's not even about inflation. The album is absolute trite garbage. It's the most flat mass-appeal music I've listened to in years. There are no redeeming qualities to this album. I just can't comprehend how anyone actually likes the album.

R U Mine is pretty good imo, the rest is very boring.

Reminder

This album is a reminder to me that Josh Homme is indeed a mortal man.

p4k stands for penis 4 klu klux klan p4gay

Of all my experience with cringe I don't think I've never seen someone understand music this poorly.

I bet you who ever wrote this has never listened to one Swans album.

what in the fuck

Do I Wanna Know is the blandest fucking song ever made and I assume the album follows suit because AM is bland. How can they even make such a comparison to those artists from these boring motherfuckers?

Better he makes another band's work shitty than his own desu

What review said that this was the "Kid A of the 2010's"

AM was generic pop bullshit FWN and the other earlier albums were a 100x better than this shit.

Yep, we all make mistakes I guess. I could never see a future Queens of the Stone Age album being absolute shit though.

*tips fedora*

>says that they can do better
>still gives it a 10/10

I mean kid a is better but it too, is grossly overrated

Kid A is a good album, AM is not.

Kid A is overrated, but still deserves praise

AM isshit and deserves nothing.

Ofc not, only patricians listen to Swans

>this is the greatest album of the decade
>but it's not as good as it could be

lmao i love this review

youtube.com/watch?v=GjwRIjrC4io