>I'd like to keep the discussion as civil as possible. No shitstorm or hate, please.
Can you explain why are the Malvinas/Falkland rightful british clay as minutely as you can? This whole issue it's confusing to me.
>I'd like to keep the discussion as civil as possible. No shitstorm or hate, please.
Can you explain why are the Malvinas/Falkland rightful british clay as minutely as you can? This whole issue it's confusing to me.
It's not, don't fall for their bullshit.
They tried the same thing with us.
So I've heard.
1. 99.9997% of the people living there wants to be British.
2. There's nothing your army can do about it.
Plus Argentina is a relatively young country with its roots in Spanish colonisation of south America
It has no more right to it than Britain
Didn't the frogs hit the islands before britain?
Irregardles my point is a country that is only about 250 years only and whose majority population are decendant of European settlers cannot claim any land as their own
Even if they did, that doesn't mean they established a permanent settlement there, and they forfeited the vast majority of their possessions to Britain anyway.
250 years old **
Yes, and it why it's called Malvinas.(It's come from Malouines who comes from Saint-Malo a french city,)