A question for all non-Americans of Sup Forums.
Were you an American, which of the two major parties you would be more likely to support?
i.e. would you be more likely a republican or a democrat?
If I were an American, I would just probably be a republican. And I suspect many Russians would too, in fact, we would've made a perfect republican electorate, were we born on a different soil as a nation, knowing our mentality.
bump
When Russia was communist we opposed y'all the strongest because of ideological conflict. Now that that chapter is over, republicans are the ones most likely to renew relations with Russia.
Do Russians respect the Republican mindset?
None and I would not even go to vote.
I don't know.
I like some republican ideas (lower taxes, less government, less social spending), but I hate the christian crap they are always shouting.
And I am for gay marriage, legal weed and free abortions.
Libertarian party is a joke though, so I would probably be a democrat. I don't know.
Republican
What's the difference?
It's just that IF WE WERE Americans, that's what I feel the majority of us would support.
It's our mentality.
I'd vote for an independent so that I don't perpetuate the corrupt two-party system.
I will add
in this election, I would vote Clinton. She is terrible in many respects but she is at least partially sane.
Also if I remember correctly, under Bill Clinton the economy went up, so that might have jumped over to Hillary.
I'd rather vote for an idiot than a sith lord. You should know better too.
They're playing you, chumps.
I would vote for Trump but not for the Republican Party.
back when only landowners had a right to vote your system had the semblance of sense to it
>the Republican mindset?
What is that?
Again, Bill Clinton was a president already and it was ok.
i dont like trump but i would vote for him rather than clinton. in what world is a psychopathic bitch that laughs over dead mutilated bodies of former country leaders called sane? she also wants to bomb more countries and is more likely to start ww3
Flag
I think it's pretty obvious
If there's no alternatives, I'd go for Republican.
I hate immigrants who want to do as they please in my ancestor land.
I hate gays, 3rd wave feminism and of course, will make my cunt great again.
>Also if I remember correctly, under Bill Clinton the economy went up, so that might have jumped over to Hillary.
That makes no sense. Also, the president doesn't really have much to do with the current economy. Bill started in a recession and ended during the dot com boom. He had dick to do with it and the repeal of Glass-Steagall which lead to the 2007 crash was signed off by him.
Not if you were a Serb :DDDD
And yet you unironically believe a blond blowhard can make America great again....
Their voters just care about muh gay marriage, getting rid of them beaners, and bombing brown people at any cost. Ironically a lot of them are working class, so their party screws them over economically while diverting their attention to social issues that shouldn't be a debate in the first place.
Explain where I said that? Your reading comprehension is amazing. I was simply saying that no Bill did not make the economy great and if anything he did more damage to it down the road.
It's about spheres of influence, you retard. No sane American (Republican or Democrat) would go "Hey, Russia, occupy this and annex this, lol, we don't care, we want good relations with you, kisses".
>Malaysia
Do you even have gays and feminist?
Don't you have Sharia laws that say that gays and feminism are illegal?
I will admit there are some smart Republicans who can stand behind their economic theories, but most I see only care about social issues and would agree with any Democrat economic policy if it was explained to them.
Republicans I know only care about kicking illegals out. They don't care about bombing brown people or gay marriage. They are more concerned with lower taxes and not pandering to welfare queens.
Also, if you are working class you are the group most negatively affected by illegal immigrants.
If I was American, I would not care about who is the president because I would be busy working and amassing a huge fortune
>would agree with any Democrat economic policy if it was explained to them
Not if it's adding more bureaucracy.
That's the big difference between the two parties. Big government vs small.
Everything is just frill on top of that.
>I would be busy working and amassing a huge fortune
So you would be republican, unless you got so rich that money didn't even matter to you anymore and you wanted to get into trying to socially engineer the rest of the populace.
You should know by now that if you talk badly about one thing, you're obviously in favor of another that contrasts the aforementioned. Such are the retarded ways of Sup Forums.
I would never support either WTF.
i got no love for clinton, but youre completely backwards. She has political experience spanning decades (such as it is) and being a democrat youd be more likely to ha e angels fly out of your dickhole than for her to start any sort of war.
Trump os a loudmoutbed boor who knows nothing of the world and would probably declare war on the first leader to cast even an inkling of an aspersion upon his capability.
A vote for trump is a vote for his aides, cuz theyd be the ones doing all the work, coming up with all the ideas and brainstorming, because this guy has NO CLUE how to be president and get on in an increasingly globalized world. All that dude sees is himself. And all the sheeple jacking off over his prises wil be are in for a VERY big surprise of hes elected. Hes already reneged and qualified his "deport em all" policy and many others.
Tldr: between the douche and the turd id pick douche hilary, simply because she wouldnt possibly fuck shit up more than trump-dono
Why is it that the debt always skyrockets under republicans and plateaus under democrats?
Fiscal conservatives my ass.
ok, Hillary might be terrible (I still think better than Trump but I see why you would hate her), but Bernie was cool at least.
I would campaign for him gladly.
Socialism!!!
It's a bit depressing desu.
Good man, praise the Monarchy!!
I, along with anyone sensible, would only want to make the government bigger if necessary. We should optimize what we have. The problem is there are dumb people from both parties.
I prefer mixed economy and have progressive stance on social issues.
It's very likely that I'd support Democrats or some minor left-wing party (Greens, Socialists).
>i got no love for clinton
>I got no
Are you a hillbilly?
President != Congress
Congress is in charge of the budget
How have you not figured out that Congress has the most power in this country? They just over-ruled Obama's veto allowing 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia.
I hate the republican and democrat parties but I'd vote Trump.
The president can suggest goals for Congress and the balance of Congress will sway with which ever party controls the white House.
It's simple, cut revenue by slashing taxes, then """"balance"""" the budget by cutting funding for social and regulatory programs, but then divert all that saved money to the military.
On government and military involvement I'd be more Republican, but on social issues I'd be a Democrat.
I love being lectured on separation of powers and the role of the Constitution by morons who believe Trump and strict constructionism can make America great again.
The fucking irony is palpable.
I agree with him on most things except economics, which I see as most important as they affect everyone. Most normies just care about social issues though. If I ask my mom why she likes trump she'll only talk about the wall and muh Christianity.
well hillary is your only other option and her economic plan is retarded
??
Yeah, a los angeles hillbily. Thats me
How? Economically we're moving on the right track, save the huge wealth gap, which any Republican would only increase.
Why doesnt everyone just vote for bernie anyways?
Who gives a hot shit if he didnt win the democrayic nomination, it was all rigged by that Wasserman-Schultz jew broad.
JUST VOTE FOR HIM ANYWAY. Its not that hard, jesus.
okay let me blow your tiny bird brain here
hillary states she wants to tax the wealthy like robin hood if she's elected
yet she receives millions of dollars from massive international banks like goldman sachs, so either
>1: massive banks are extremely charitable and will donate literally millions in order to get 75% of every dollar they make taxed
>2: clinton runs her entire campaign like a mafia, selling influence in government while she is running so that when she's elected she can reward her cronies, these banks will never be taxed like she promises, they will all get favorable legislation and dodge any progressive tax policy
not even going into the fact that even if she is elected, taxing the nation to death forcing every single corporation and wealthy person to leave while growth is already extremely low is autistic
Neither if I look at the candidates they have this year.
>half the dems vote for bernie
>half vote for hillary
>all reps vote trump
who the fuck do you think will win?
When woodrow wilson was elected, he won because teddy roosevelt was a little bitch and ran alongside his partymate taft, and they split the liberal vote. wilson won as a result. wilson was a fine president. dont fucking make that happen with trump.
>implying we're not using Brit old laws.
We're not fully sharia. Sharia here is only for muslim matters like marriage, divorce, prays, calendars and all that. The rest follows Natural Law.
Men to men will be fined and jailed. No laws against lesbians though.
Gay & feminism is not to be considered as cancer here, but they exist in smaller portion of society because of globalisation.
And my previous answer is ITT,
>If I am American
I'm sorry, you're autistic if you think that's gonna happen. just stop commenting on american politics.
I would realize I am utterly powerless to change anything and democracy is a lie.
nice cognitive dissonance, forcing you to resort to calling me autistic
we all know hillary gets $225,000 for speaking to goldman sachs just cause she's such a gud speaker :^ ))))
Republicans.
I would move to Europe as soon as possible.
I don't think I'd vote at all. That two-party system is so fucking shit, I'd just give up.
>A vote for trump is a vote for his aides
Pence is fucking amazing. That's half the reason I like Trump, because he has some aces on his team.
>be important person
>someone hires me to speak for their company
>that someone is also really important
>that someone is really, really rich
sorry, in the USA, we have something called "capitalism." Hillary can set a price for her speeches and sell them if there are customers.
>Pence is fucking amazing
ahahahaha
AHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHHAAH
BWAAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAH
Are you fucking RETARDED?
State your flawed reasoning.
She wants to raise taxes on income over 250000 by a couple percentage points.
I couldn't stand voting Hillary because it's be more PC bullshit.
It's mean a step towards Merkel-style immigration policy, more apologetics to BLM, more of the same liberal Norton that intolerance towards "intolerance" is ok, and that opinions are to be policed.
Democrats are cancerous to the American mindset. The details can be discussed, but it's just simply true that the Democrats are the most baton-happy with dissenters.
Did you watch the Vice Presidential debate?
If you have disagreements about policy, that's that and you won't like him on that alone, and I can understand that at least.
But he was well articulating, he was sharp, concise, and made an excellent strong showing and did well to represent his ideology.
Literally communism
Both main parties have shitty followings (and the rest are pointless). It's like choosing whether you want to be lectured by college students about LGBT pronouns or senile old people in diapers about dem brown people.
>those people are 5% of the population
>they already pay 51% of income tax
>you want them to pay even more, and tax them when they die too
wew