Describe me the different boroughs of London.
Describe me the different boroughs of London
basically the ones around the centre north of the river are decent
everywhere else is pretty depressing and shit
this
Which boroughs are the best for a #cheekynandoswiththelads
Magaluf
North West Represent. It's awful.
Nando's in the UK sucks, the portions are smaller than the Aussie version and it's almost twice as expensive. Was very disappointed.
tower hamlets are decent?
Pekham bruv we run deez ends
>tower hamlets are decent?
Tower Hamlets houses both the Financial District and the biggest shitholes in London.
what on earth did he mean by this
southwark's great
only place south of the thames that's any good imo (including all of england)
Greenwich is nice m8
Sorry, I was being incredible bigoted and racist... :^(
I misunderstood what you wrote тbh
Tower Hamlets houses Canary Wharf, the Financial capital of London and also houses the general filth you see those Daily Mail stories about.
JF here, I've lived in Limehouse (Tower Hamlets) and now live in Richmond. They're worlds apart; Richmond is beautiful, only issue is it's full of yanks. Limehouse is a shithole, complete and utter. Only good thing is it's close to the centre and Canary Wharf.
>Go running round Richmond Park
>Lovely scenery
>Wild Deer grazing
Shit was delightful t.b.h
rip in piece londonium
London is a Slav city now.
Where I live (Kensington and Chelsea) is basically full of rich people such as bankers, Russian oligarchs and Arab oil sheikhs. It's expensive, but nice to live in because it has zero crime and looks pretty.
City of London is where banks etc. are.
Westminster is more or less like Kensington and Chelsea.
Camden is where the hippies/"alternative" types live. Also lots of nightclubs.
Hammersmith and Fulham is a decent but boring, decidedly middle class borough
Tower hamlets is where the durkas are (case in point: get off at Whitechapel station, you will mostly see Arabic signs, women in veils, a huge ass mosque)
Outer boroughs are shitholes
Don't know much about Islington and the ones south of the river
NO. It's nuke tier and the one exception to the otherwise good rule you're replying to.
>Whitechapel station
Haha I stayed around the corner from there and you're not exhaggerating, the suburb was like 90% muslim. Almost all the women wore full niqabs/burqas. There were schools in which the name of the school was written in Arabic, and there was not a single white kid to be seen.
Generally London is good on one street and shit on the next pretty much anywhere. This is the correct answer basically
Islington and Hackney are both very good these days.
South of the River is shit but has it's very rich bits - Greenwich & Richmond and both lovely. Lewisham and Lambeth less so. Wandsworth a bit of both.
FENNNTON
OH JESUS CHRIST
As a rule everything west is top tier but not that central. Nice places
South is a bit shit but far out areas have some ok burbs and areas close to river in southwark etc are ok.
North east is worst area for most part.
Anything zone 1 is ok in terms of wealth cos of locality and tourists
>France
>City
mr shekelsteins private fiefdom
>tower hamlets
"i dont think sharia bloody allows it"
>newham
"nigerians and gunshots"
>greenwich
birthplace of time,expensive houses and nice boats
>Lewisham
eh senpai have some rice and peas.
>Southwark
Bud bud ding ding 2.99
>Lambeth
welcome to africa
>wandsworth
welcome to a nicer version of africa with white liberals.
>houndslow and fullam
fuck the kuffar, want some heroin?
>kensington and chelsea
Here is the £500,000 new ferrari for the sheikh and a £600,000 new bugatti for his corrupt British arms dealer friend
>Westminster
Mini washington dc with 2x the corruption and lies
>Camden
Music and Dude weed
>Islington
Rich old white liberals and book publishing companies
>Haringey
Poor relatively whitish area,tries to be good.
>Hackney
Gunshots and sirens,hipsters and people paying way to much to live there.
keep going.
im not gonna list all of them
fat cunt