>a post-grunge, pop album normies love is better than your favorite album
How does it feel Sup Forums?
A post-grunge, pop album normies love is better than your favorite album
He gave Korn, Limp Bizkit, Aqua and Lana Del Rey higher scores than most Radiohead, Beatles or Bowie albums.
except my favorite album got a 9/10 from scaruffi :)
>caring what that filthy Italian peadophile thinks about music
No thanks
this
...
He's right tho.
And what's the problem here? That is correct.
Scaruffi isnt pedophile.
>It's like raaaaiiaaaaaiiiiiiiin on your wedding day
Ironic.
not ironic
dontcha think?
Lmao stfu contrarian shitters
scaruffi's knowledge and expertise are incredible
There is no proof he has actually listened to most albums he rated and he probably did so only once most times
...
not respecting scaruffi's reviews is contrarian
he's right you know
jagged little pill is fucking god tier
based
>There is no proof he has actually listened to most albums he rated and he probably did so only once most times
Are you fucking retarded? Do you expect music reviewers to provide evidence regarding how many times they listened to an album before reviewing it? Did you want a screenshot from his music player?
The review is accurate or it isn't, and you can read it. That's the only evidence that matters.
And I like how after raising this bizarre issue of there being a lack of proof you just claim to know that he's probably listening to albums only once. And you provide absolutely nothing to support that.
Because Radiohead, the Beatles, and Bowie completely fail to live up to their own artistic pretensions, and so deserve a lower score than well-executed pop that never aims to be anything more
>being this much of Scaruffi drone
Lmao
His reviews are basic at best
>fail to live up to their own artistic pretensions
That's total bullshit and stupid
>well-executed pop that never aims to be anything more
Yeah so generic EDM deserves high score because it fills it's purpose
Because he doesn't provide "evidence" on how many times he's listened to the albums?
Your argument makes no sense. That's why Scaruffi is a god and you're nobody.
no he's right.
I don't care how a reviewer does it (listening repeatedly in moods / situations a variety of situations, with or without research or prior knowledge of the artist, just hearing it once, or even not at all -just making a lucky guuess or ripping off other reviews) whatever.
If it's a good review, it's a good review. period
Besides, there isn't a way to 'prove' that the album was played that sn't easy to game - and there is NO way to prove it was listened to
that's not true lol
He gave 1; 7.5, 4; 6's and the other half of their discography a bunch of 4's and one 3
He gave LB's first two albums decent scores and the rest (including Chocolate Starfish which is the one everybody knows them for) a 4. He didn't even really bother writing reviews for their last three albums because they haven't improved or changed in quality that much so far since Chocolate Starfish