If this part of the country vanished tomorrow, literally no one would notice

If this part of the country vanished tomorrow, literally no one would notice.

What a fucking waste of space

Other urls found in this thread:

statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
latimes.com/nation/la-na-kansas-hard-times-snap-20161121-story.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

no one really cares about US states

Why don't Americans post about America to other people who will only understand if they were American in the general that's dedicated to America (and our land neighbours)?

Fuck off cunt

Montana is the home town of Ben Garrison
>how dare you

>Montana is the home town

Where would you put all of your moo moos and cash crops, though?

In the South and the Midwest where they've always been. The Great Plains grow grains

What happens there?

pretty sure people would notice if we ran out of corn, wheat, and the price of pork shot up.

Libertarians and farmers

Except Idaho, Montana and Utah are some of the basedest, most white, most conservative and Christian states of them all with great nature and wildlife you stupid fucking nigger

If you got rid of the entire east coast literally nothing of true value would be lost

America would be immeasurably better if you killed everyone on the coastal areas

>getting rid of states that supply most of the county with food
wew lad, plus I live there

...

Wish the sea ice was melting faster, world would be a better place with all these cunts hundreds of feet underwater.

They'd just move inland and start shitting up the interior

It's true, name a single city on the coast that isn't either full of niggers or inhabited by smelly left wing hipsters

>these posts

Still butthurt about the election OP?

Not enough space for all the cows in the midwest and south. At least if you want cows that are not caged in small pens that cant move. Cows out here get 100s of acres and eat grass, not corn.

Say it with me cucklet: Madame President!

What did OP's post have to do with the election?

>he thinks that people actually live in cities on the east coast

it's not Australia where 90% of people live Sydney, Waga Waga, and Boopboopity Boo (or whatever the Abbos called them before colonization)

Galveston or Mobile maybe
>you are now aware that the largest city in Trump's America is fucking Phoenix

1/6th of the country lives on the East Coast

Why do liberals have such contempt for farmers

It's just banter desu. Why do conservatives have so much contempt for cities?

Because they're unironically the biggest welfare niggers in the country

Maybe if you're vegetarian

Share of U.S. receipts for Meat animals
>1. Nebraska 13.4%
>2. Iowa 12.0%
>4. Kansas 9.4%
>5. Oklahoma 4.8%
>9. South Dakota 3.1%
>13. Idaho 2.0%

All those states voted for trump. All those states combined have less people than New York but more electoral votes combined.

>he thinks that people actually live in CITIES on the east coast


nice reading comprehension you dumb fuck

>NY
>Washington
>Miami
>Boston
>Baltimore
>Philadelphia
>Jacksonville

I have been to literally all of these cities (ok I drove through baltimore with my doors locked) and they are all fucking awful.

OK well we can still have inter state banter for non political reasons. Regardless of politics, those states are still irrelevant 99% of the time.

basically OP is a bitter nigger/spic who lives in some coastal ghetto and will never experience the true american frontier

>he thinks that the suburbs aren't liberal shitholes as well

Philadelphia is OK

if this part of the country vanished tomorrow everyone would rejoice

>he wants to get rid of states that pay more to the federal government than they take

>Twitter: the state
Well, you aren't wrong

Northern California (the very north) is actually really nice though. Almost all white, republican voting, close to nature, decent weather and some really nice small towns.

nothing

Who going to pay for your gibs me dat without the decent parts of the country?

erm, without almost the entire nigger population and a lot of hispanics, the country will pay for itself very nicely

statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

except when everyone started starving

>tell the farmers to fuck off and stop giving them subsidies
>they stop using Monsanto seed and start using diverse shit to lower the costs
>suddenly we have a balance in the budget and Monsanto is btfo for all eternity
Nuking the cities would kill 15 birds with one stone

>he doesn't know
Rural communities aren't practical anymore and without us they'd be an Africa tier nation.

Because there so many first world farming nations right?

I would notice. They're good people. Shame on you, OP.

>removing subsidies means that all other industry is destroyed
Nice strawman faggot

There'd be more if population density and the resulting sprawl didn't send land costs skyrocketing

Canada and Australia come to mind

you'd run out of corn syrup and all be dead within a month since you can't eat without it

Isn't most of Canada's populations near the great lakes?

You're the one that wanted to destroy every major city.

Yes, but most of our agriculture is in the praries.

There isn't a lot of manufacturing going on in our major cities

There'd no place to offload those goods without ports.........

this

The US controls the first and second largest commercially navigable river systems in the world, I think we can handle using a few small river ports when we have half the population we have now

>When Americans and anglos start to talk about how their are whitestest countries/counties in the world, as if it's some fucking trophy
You're white, we get it. Nothing to be proud or ashamed about.

>something that literally no one was talking about
Why are Euros so fucking obsessed

About half of the threads about whiteness, if not more, are done by burgers or Australians, and in this thread I only see a bit anglo circlejerk about which state is the whitestest.

>About half of the threads about whiteness, if not more, are done by burgers or Australians
No

>anglo circlejerking about why white, Republican states are better despite being shitholes
That's more accurate

Maine is the whitest U.S. state

>What a fucking waste of space
To you maybe, but it's nice out here

The word "Quaint" comes to mind

>Libertarians
Funny joke

Something something intolerant conservatives

"City is shitty"

>Liberals
>Hating welfare niggers
Heh

>>Liberals
>>Hating welfare niggers
These welfare niggers vote Republican

...

Yeah, fuck every peaceful, nice place that isn't corrupt, overcrowded and violent and shit
God I hate the literal teenagers that post here

And of course there's no circle in Wyoming, there are no major cities here

That's why

It's not because they're welfare niggers, it's because they're red

Actually it can be kinda corrupt out here in "Who cares" land
But it isn't massive corruption, mostly just "Hey we need new roads, lets use my construction company instead of anyone else"

And good for them, because "major cities" are irredeemable garbage heaps. No human settlement of any kind should ever exceed 2 million people.

Those red states are the poorest of the country for a reason
latimes.com/nation/la-na-kansas-hard-times-snap-20161121-story.html

Libertarians are genuises

What is this supposed to convey, that Democrat controlled cities are violent shitholes?

There are cities with much lower populations than Cheyenne that have much higher crime rates. It has nothing to do with the population size

>muh meme economics
They have all modern conveniences and are surrounded by beautiful nature, I really don't give a rat's arse if people living in rotting two room apartments in NYC are supposedly richer than them.

The reason is their economies are agricultural in a nation that imports agricultural products from across the globe

Though Kansas was a very funny experiment in Libertarian economics.

Still mad about the election?

>Those red states are the poorest of the country for a reason
If wonder if that's because their economy is largely based on agriculture. Makes my noodle do a think

They have all those conveniences because they take more money from the federal government than they put in.

>all of this is done through welfare lmoa
Stop posting, you're embarrassing yourself

>Lives in a comfy 2-stories houses in Bumfuck, Oklahoma
>Shitty public ed
>Shitty public health
>Decide to bet it on the market because why not
>Suddenly 2008 crisis
>Evicted from your house

I was absolutely appealed when I learned that not a single state tried to stop the foreclosures and offered to buy off at least part of the houseowners debt.
In those states if you've got an accident in life you can and often will lose everything.

They are nice, the people are extremely friendly (talked with a few Americans from flyovers states during a trip), and the nature is gorgeous... but it's not the way I want to live.

Would have imagined farmers would favour a stronger government and rural regions grants.

yeah I don't think I'm missing out on the land that god forgot
it's true though. all those nice roads and mobile health clinics and schools you insist on not teaching in are paid for by the same people you hurl slurs at.

Maybe they don't appreciate the tendency of the federal government to try to take their rights away

>schools you insist on not teaching in
Jesus Christ you're a faggot

and your use of insults instead of any actual citations backs me up.

>rights
They don't have a meme minority language to complain about, what the hell is their problem ?

>meme creationist school board decisions that in no way represent the states as a whole
Fuck off

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights
Take your pick

Hmmm...

Believe it or not, not everyone in those states are farmers, and they don't all get subsidies for crops

Farmers pay for a lot, but hardly pay for everything

>In those states if you've got an accident in life you can and often will lose everything
That's health insurance, i.e. not something the government pays for

>not a single state tried to stop the foreclosures and offered to buy off at least part of the houseowners debt
Because not many people lost their homes in these parts

No
The reason is because the government in these parts rely a LOT on farmers and ranchers to pay for their shit

Second amendment repealers are annoying because hunting rodents, coyotes, or mountain lions which eat your shit gets infinitely harder

Their ability to protest about abuses by powerful local governments is eliminated by the repealing of the first amendment to protect ethnic minorities from their feelings

etc. etc.

>muh freedums

I don't see how a competent federal police/gendarmerie service, properly funded social security, properly funded education and nationalisation of basic necessities (water, electricity, fire dept, transports...) is against the bill of rights.

As for guns, I honestly think they should be treated as a privilege, not a "right". Who needs a militia anymore ?

And not all the federal money those states receives goes to farmers...

>I don't see how a competent federal police/gendarmerie service, properly funded social security, properly funded education and nationalisation of basic necessities (water, electricity, fire dept, transports...) is against the bill of rights.
Maybe because the national government is full of incompetent retards who couldn't make it in the private sector. Don't start this "But it works in Europe" shit when you post about >60% every fucking day, niggers won't pay into the system

>it's a brit tells the American about his own nation episode

>basedest

back to Sup Forums you cancerous faggot

Meh, it's probably cultural shock from an extremely centralised country and extremely decentralised one.

Burgers, please answer this honestly without insults. Do you feel the effects (good or bad) of the federal form of government in your daily lives ?

stop making stupid interstate "banter" threads on an international board then you dumb faggot

stop pretending that uneducated, poor, uninhabited, conservative territory is "basedest" because of skin color

actually why am i even responding to you, you dumb brit lmao. I only banter americans. Kill yourself.

>I was absolutely appealed when I learned that not a single state tried to stop the foreclosures and offered to buy off at least part of the houseowners debt.
That's not the government's job

it sounds like you're the only one who won't pay into the system though, since you're so anti-tax. also who had the genius idea that public sector employees should have success in the private sector? success in capitalism is built on labor exploitation, the whole point of a government is to create a safety net and effective services for their citizens.

It's crazy how different anglos in general and us frogs view the state. Ask any Frenchman if Healthcare/Fire/Prisons should be privatised, or for profit, I'm 90% sure they would never say yes.
I hate the EU for forcing this privatisation down our throats.

>60%
I'm not that kind of guy, I don't care about race. They are good and awful people of every ethnicity. You've never tried a state-owned approach, and (no offense) scream socialism at every attempt to do so.

>The government's job is not to ensure the well-being of all citizens, regardless of wealth
>The government's job is not to protect the most vulnerable

The majority of it does

What else does it go to? Roads? Natives?
Back up your claims please

>Do you feel the effects (good or bad) of the federal form of government in your daily lives ?
Yes I do, everyone does
Even out here in bumfuck we feel the effects of bigwigs in D.C.
Federalism does that

>England
>Not mocking the Norn, Scots, and Welsh
Uh huh

>because of skin color
niggers are stupid, get over it

>Federalism does that
It would be much worse if the US was a unitary state, wouldn't it ?