Is there a reason as to why 'men' on the coasts are so much shorter and less athletic than guys in middle America?

Is there a reason as to why 'men' on the coasts are so much shorter and less athletic than guys in middle America?

Per capita most athletes come from places not touching an ocean

>NFL
1. Louisiana
2. South Carolina
3. Mississippi
4. Alabama
nola.com/lsu/index.ssf/2014/09/louisiana_has_the_most_players.html

>NBA
1. Mississippi
2. Louisiana
3. New Hampshire
4. Kentucky
sportsgrid.com/nba/which-state-produces-the-most-nba-players-per-capita-you-ask-weve-got-a-map-for-that/

>NHL
1. Alaska
2. Minnesota
3. Vermont
4. North Dakota
slapshot.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/hockeys-heartland-state-by-state/?_r=0

What is it about the coasts that make such short, weak, effeminate 'men'?
Will that ever change in the future or will coastal states always be small and frail?

california produces the best athletes

>South Carolina
>Not touching an ocean

>the uneducated shantytown of OP

Flyovers get 3 hearty meals a deal.
Coastlets drink semen.

Until coastcucks stop drinking semen they will always be manlets

Not really. And especially not per capita.
40 million people sample size I'd expect some people to go pro

>be 5'11"
>go to Massachusetts for 4 days
>only saw about 5 people taller than me the entire trip

>Alaska, Vermont, and North Dakota are good sports states

Funny implication OP

They produce more NHL players per capita than the northeast and California.

semen is a good source of protein though

>anyone besides states with a bunch of inbreds caring about hockey

seriously m8 sort yourself out

Honestly, the large populations of Mexicans and Asians on the coast. They're just not athlete material.

Middle of America are usually German or Scandinavian descent. South is niggers of course. East and west coast people are of inferior Irish and English descent.

...

And other states produce more athletes of different sports.
Not to mention the height difference.

I don't get how you could possibly be arguing. Coastlets are smaller and don't produce.

And how many players is that?

Flyover states are more likely to have scandinavians and germans, while coastal states are more likely to have blacks, south americans, and asians.

Minnesota alone could field an entire NHL team roster

>Louisiana, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Alabama

Those are just the states with the most black people and the lowest income

Ethnicity doesn't really have much of a factor on height as you'd like to believe. Take the Dutch for example, 100 years ago they were on average the shortest Europeans and now they are the tallest people in the world.

It all just does down to the kind of foods you eat and how much exercise you get, middle americans probably get 90% of their food from farms and ranches from down the road and do more robust work whereas other places have to rely on food that's had preservatives and additives etc and more likely to work in office jobs.

But I listed hockey as well and coastlets are nowhere to be found.

It would seem that men on the coasts are shorter weaker and less skilled than middle America

K...

Where did I mention Minnesota?

GAS THE COASTLETS

>not touching an ocean

>1. Louisiana
>2. South Carolina
>3. Mississippi
>4. Alabama

>1. Mississippi
>2. Louisiana
>3. New Hampshire

>1. Alaska

Jesus fucking Christ you are the biggest goddamned moron I've seen on Sup Forums in a long time

Why didn't you list baseball?

>inb4 boreball
>inb4 not a sport

Well, you could've made a better or original bait thread, but nope

(You)

Middle Americans are far more likely to be obese than their coastal counterparts, though. States like Texas, Kentucky, and Michigan are the fattest in the nation, those people aren't exercising.

Hockey is less popular on the coasts, the only states where it's the #1 sport are all in the Midwest.

probably from the genes that farm boys/coal miners tended to have. Look at the first "professional" sports teams for baseball for example, they're almost all mining teams n shit that got gud. The guys that "headed out west" first weren't little bitch men, they were hard as fuck

Because they didn't mine or have farms on the coasts?


>Canadians giving lectures on American history

You know what was implied

So if hockey isn't as popular on the coasts you'd assume that football or baseball is more popular. Yet those stats don't produce those players either.

Tall to a coastlet is 6'
Tall to a flyover is 6'4"

What makes Colorado so unamerican?

No, I don't. Because 2/3 of the states named have a coastline

He disproved his own point

Fine, east and west coast then.

Nobody would consider Mississippi or Alaska to be a coast state.

If you're retarded

No good plains for crops and animals

Retarded is better than being a manlet

Alaska is a Pacific Northwest state

Mississippi is that dirty dirty third coast muddy water