Post Decisive Victories made by your cunt

Post Decisive Victories made by your cunt.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Boquerón_(1932)
discoveringparaguay.com/home/victoria-de-boqueron-victory-of-boqueron/
soundsandcolours.com/reviews/film-reviews/bolivian-film-boqueron-evokes-the-forgotten-horrors-of-the-chaco-war-29020/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Suomussalmi
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pincer_movement
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

"Although the defenders were poorly trained, outnumbered and under-resourced, the resistance was such that, according to captured documents, the Japanese believed they had defeated a force more than 1,200 strong when, in fact, they were facing between 77 and 140 Australian troops"

>tfw a battle hardened army out numbers a small under prepared civilian conscripted militia and still loses'
Feels good

...

Did it feel good when you lost to emus?

>tfw to intelligent to respond

But you just did,emu

>tfw you can't place heavy artillery on the hill's slopes

Noice.

kek

not victory yet but it will be anyway

Please invade Finland on the 100th Year anniversary of Independence

Little bit older tho.

This

Good thing the Czechs have kept to the beliefs they fought for.

>victories
Go-good one user

After Thirty years war and two hundred years of Habsburks we're glad that we can even speak Czech

this one i guess
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Boquerón_(1932)
discoveringparaguay.com/home/victoria-de-boqueron-victory-of-boqueron/
soundsandcolours.com/reviews/film-reviews/bolivian-film-boqueron-evokes-the-forgotten-horrors-of-the-chaco-war-29020/
alas, poor Bolivia. it got beaten even by Paraguay

Wonder what may have come from it if it had happened at the same time as the Peasant's war in Germany?

Finland can't into decisive :(

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Suomussalmi

> even by Paraguay

Paraguay had one of the finest armies in the world until the 1860s genocide. The Paraguayan military tradition should not be overlooked.

that time when France alone defeated the whole of Europe

oh wait that happened at least 400 times through history

>the French colony of europe and the british isles

nah... even without finns we have enough drunkard autists

Rule Britannia

still got BTFO on land for 10 more years though

And you made murika

>tfw you realize that France has a chance against any other European country only when led either by a woman or someone who's not even French

>none of the French kings were French

so... this... is... the... true... power... of... Chile...

Are we allowed to talk about our parent country's victories?

Sorry I can't hear you over the sound of all these longbows.

>Generals lead armies, not kings
You guys were successful only when you fought against other french or some third world shithole and even then you just got rekt.

Never forget 1879

Don bully chequia

In the Cathedral of Santiago there's a statue of "Santiago Matamoros" (translated: Santiago Moor Killer) riding on his horse cutting the heads of moors.

They hide the moors with flowers not too long ago haha

this will never be not funny

That's the most impressive war in the 20th century.

> ywn surprise-attack your enemy and cripple him in half a day

still got BTFO in the end

all this battle showed is that English people were pieces of shit who had no regard for the laws of chivalry that had governed encounters in Europe for centuries

almost all our kings and emperors led troops into battle, that's part of the way they got their legitimacy

Yet the most succesfull you were when you were led by a lunatic woman or Corsican.

not really no, the hundred years war was more like a civil war because it was a fight over the crown of France from two French king, and Jehanne wasn't a military leader, more like a paragon, and we BTFO 3/4 of Europe already during the revolutionary wars prior to Napoleon, many of our kings were also very successful in warfare.

>Assad is red
,slrd .r yjoml

Long may our rivalry remain.
And in the next war.. I hope we're shoulder to shoulder.

So basically (if the hundred years war was a civil war as you stated) that means that it was French fighting French just like revolutionary war?

pravda vítězí!

revolutionary war was French fighting europe, hundred years war was a French king of England with possessions in France fighting a French king of France for the crown of France.

the notion of kingdom back then was a lot more flexible than the idea of nation, since land was transmitted through inheritance

...

benis :--DD

>that's the battle that made the Russians change their tactics and lead to them BTFO'ing the Swedes

we don't have decisive victories

we have the underdog "jesus christ how the fuck was this even possible" defeats that result in war-ending victories

Veritas vincit!

>no regard for the laws of chivalry that had governed encounters in Europe for centuries
adapt, frenchie

>36 000 captured
Italians really didn't like to fight back then. And we are laughing at French

...

some serious Helm's Deep kind of shit

it's not about adapting, there was a clear tacit agreement between all countries that nobles captured in battle were to be exchanged for ransom, this is the first battle of the middle ages where a king ordered for the killing of all prisoners regardless of blood or status

anyone have the english vs french battle where the french knights got stuck in a quagmire of mud and their own feces and killed by english bowmen?

>Instead of Zerg rushing the Swedes in foreign territory they made the Swedes enter thers

Godspeed

Crécy and Azincourt

...

>on land
lmao who cares

Depends, how English is your surname?

How do you fuck up this bad? Just fucking get everyone in a line and shoot, what the hell happened?

round em up and execute the gommies

removing them by air

>what the hell happened?

Swedish cavalry destroyed the Saxon flanks and surrounded the rest of the army which led to panic and mass surrender

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pincer_movement