How does your county deal with separatist movements?

How does your county deal with separatist movements?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3AR5S3AIgjw&list=PLA8C3EBCB072172D9
pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolução_Constitucionalista_de_1932
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragamuffin_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

We fight them, lose, then they fight us, then we win.

what? we have none

California and Texas?

We laugh about those pesky Bavarians. For they will never have their own country.
t.Saupreiß

But they do, it's called "Österreich"

>real separatist movements
>not a fucking meme

With carpet bombings and genocide.

We give separatists their own country and then keep musing if it wouldn't be better if he hadn't separated.

FAB 5000 is the only true answer.

Just because they both talk funny ?
And I said "own country". That doesn't include already German clay. Only their own.

>bombing his own clay

Terrible strategy дpyг

youtube.com/watch?v=3AR5S3AIgjw&list=PLA8C3EBCB072172D9
Muslim terrorists are the vermins and must cleansed and purged.

good tactic.

We just throw lots of gibs at them.

Leave the Kurds alone!

if they leave us alone first

Unless I'm reading it wrong, that's like half percent of your gdp that's redistributed like that, yes?

We killed every single one of them during empire.

Nowadays it's just a bunch of autists that nobody gives attention.

>We killed every single one of them during empire.
Knock knock...

Cough cough cough

>Nowadays it's just a bunch of autists that nobody gives attention.


Nice reading comprehension.

Alto that vote didn't even reached 1% of the south population so, nobody cares.

Also:

>during empire
Didn't you study the history of your own fucking State?
pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolução_Constitucionalista_de_1932

>muh 32

Still lost and ironically the southerners fought against.

The Union forever.

What a shitty flag design.

This. Stripes are gay.

It is enough to show that no, separatism wasn't killed on Peter II times.

>southerners fought against
*Vargas forces fought against. Vargas did not represent the whole South, not even the whole Rio Grande.

Are you being ironic? Because it is very similar tou yours.

Long history short, this is this São Paulo's actual flag they got from a refused proposal from a Brazilian flag. The separatist movement switches the Brazilian map with a Paulista one.

Aesthetically speaking: the colour set is nice, but I agree the template is ugly.

Pedro did.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragamuffin_War

I said southerners, not south itself. Again, reading comprehension.

...

Essa tirinha me deixou pensando. Eu sou à favor da separação, mas e se subir um socialista no poder? A maior parte dos votos da Dilma vieram do sul, aqui tem uma tendência à esquerda

We are the separatists.

>Pedro did.
If Peter II did, you wouldn't see separatism rising up again in 1932. Or being one of the issues behind Contestado. And AFAIK even Pernambuco had a separatist revolt after the "empire" ended.

kek

Well, at least they fared better than us. Ragamuffins was organized, Contestado was messy as fuck.

We elect them president

>you wouldn't see separatism rising up again in 1932

Because they thought it would be the same shitshow when we got the independence. They thought they could create a new country that the republic wouldn't give a shit.

This makes zero sense

by prohibiting referendums calling them against constitutional law

[I'll answer in English to avoid language-locking people]

I'd say the resulting government would probably be far more right-wing than the current Bradzilla government, even if this annoys me a little bit (since I'm left-wing myself).

Except they knew the process would be completely different, since there was no greedy prince to make a gambit with the crown to begin with.

This

We do that a lot here

>Ragamuffins
>Contestado
???
Is Temer a fascist ?

I meant Bolsonaro

So does bending over for injuins but yall keep doing it

We just killed their kids

Roughly 80 years after Ragamuffins War [Guerra dos Farrapos], there was a revolt on Paraná and Santa Catarina, called Contestado War.

Among other things (like religious zealots, kicking immigrants out, disputed State borders), Contestado defended the creation of a "celestial monarchy" (a Christian theocracy).

Temer is scum, but he isn't a fascist.
Bolsonaro does look like one though.

Sounds like you're holding them prisoners. Let them go.

>killed their kids
wat!
where why!? ;_;

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia

Ukraine pulled the same shit as Haiti, killing people from the ethnicity of their former colonial overlords.

We elect their leader as president so the process can transition smoothly

we dont have any because they succeeded in the xix century. basically paraguay and uruguay and Tarija in Bolivia.

Don't be hypocrite pls

You need to learn some history, we did allow them to have a referendum. Therefore we are the good guys.

Are you talking about '95? There was plenty FUD going against QC:
>the abos will side with the Anglos and you'll lose the North!
>QC won't survive alone!
>you're betraying Canada!
>Parizeau does not represent Quebec's "true interests"!

We have been dealing preety good until Uncle Sam gathered cuckarmy called nato.

Badly.

All 4 points you raised are facts not FUD

It's just the loudest jackasses in either state. When Obama won 2012 it was some butthurt retards who wanted McCain to win, now that Trump won it was the same thing, in another state, on the other side. No majority in either state would seriously consider seceding, nor would the rest of the country allow it; both states are vital economically and, arguably, even culturally.

we ignore them until the start losing interest

QC has a strong economy by itself. It can survive alone just fine.
The natives' allegiance might change. It is an issue, but it isn't set up on stone.
"You're betraying Canada" is silly. Canada is not a person to have feelings, bear interests by itself or crap like that, it is a country. You can't betray a country - at most, betray _the populations ruled by said country_.
The PQ was democratically elected by the Quebecois, so yes, Parizeau did represent them.

...

Quebec gets $8 billion worth equalization payments every year. Say good bye to free money.

>Quebec
>Home of Ubisoft, Bombardier and various local buisnesses.
Remind me what you have in Anglo Canada again ? RBC and a few insurance companies ?

Vietnam doesn't have any separatist movement.

Also, the anglos all came to Montreal to say "I love you Quebec, please stay" and now they hate us

what about the south and the north?

We are both Kinh people, what is there to separate? Both South Vietnam and North Vietnam in the past wanted to unify Vietnam, not become independent.

We get our armies together, pose them an ultimatum and then politely ask them to leave.

And it was AWKWARD for everyone!

>How does your county deal with separatist movements?

Pic related.

There's like one single retarded brazillian in the whole Sup Forums that always spams this shit about separatism in Brazil. We simply don't have nothing like this over here, this is just bullshit.

This thread about how you deal with separatists not trying to deal.

>There's like one single retarded brazillian in the whole Sup Forums that always spams this shit about separatism in Brazil
>if I pretend the others don't exist, they don't!

I've seen other people besides me talking about it. And TB.H I was quite happy to see the subject goes on, even if I'm just lurking.

>Having seperatist movements
Haha, enjoy your non-singular nation states and arbitarily defined borders faggots.

How are the Sami and Kven going?