There's a guy on YouTube called anxiety war. Some of you CP watching fuckheads should take a look

There's a guy on YouTube called anxiety war. Some of you CP watching fuckheads should take a look.

Fucking faggots.

good channel. ya know we'll have some people trying to justify themselves being a kid fucker

Tbh fam if you want to jerk off to the though of fucking a kid then do it (like me) but if you actually go and do it irl then you need to be violently murdered by starving dogs

supporting child porn doesnt make you much better. You deserved to be murdered by somewhat well fed dogs. Still a faggot

You can't be murdered by starving dogs.

>trys to justify jerking off to small children.
Dude little kids aren't even attractive you're wrong and you should be hanged.

What the hell is wrong with people

nice try, NSA

Bump

>i'm too scared to molest a kid

wow you're gay

Would you guys apply the same reasoning to snuff, or rape fantasy, or beastiality? Would you advocate for the same punishment, worse, or lesser? Based on what threshold? Would you make exceptions for "fantasy" derivatives of any of these things (e.g., rape fantasy, furry cosplay, etc) or treat them as "equal" to their real life counterparts?

Unless you can answer these questions unequivocally, it makes no more sense to be this vitriolic and dogmatic about a fantasy depiction of minors (be they children or teens) than it does any of the other ostensibly deviant and "degenerate" fetishes I listed.

It has nothing to do with any of them being right or wrong, the point is that it's ludicrous to treat actual sex offenders and people who look at loli as the same, or to punish them the same.

HAHAH SHUT UP YA KID FUCKER

you "fantasize" about fucking kids. Those kid diddlers on Anxiety Wars also had fantasies at one point.

Bestiality is wrong, you should be hanged
Furry sex is weird. Idk man I'd probs hang someone for that.
Loli is anime AND child porn...YOU SHOULD BE FUCKEN HANGED KID
don't try to justify it. You're wrong and you should feel wrong.

Kys.

And btw why don't you just tug to someone that actually has tits and is attractive. Maybe someone like alexas texas. She's P hot.

because he cant fantasize bout her fucking him because shed never fuck a fat neckbeard weeb. Only chance he'd have is seducing a vulnerable kid.

>Idk man I'd probs hang someone for that.

you wouldn't do shit buddy i'd beat the shit out of you while fucking your mother

but you're right all those things are pretty weird

>don't try to justify it

You live by the rulebook, you die by the rulebook.

You are not perfect and you will be made into a hypocrite and punished the way you punish others.

Read the new testament, ancient Israel proved people can't possibly obey laws and enforce them without hypocrisy.

If there was someone in this thread that's sexually deviant, my money is on you.

Woah. So many degenerates in one thread. Fantasy is harmless. CP is harmful. Anime is also harmless. I neither watch porn nor fantasize since being in a relationship. I don't judge other people's ideas of fantasy as it doesn't hurt me, vulnerable children or anyone for that matter.

...

Basically, you want to fap to thoughts of having sex with under 18s? Fine. But keep it to just that. If you can't fantasize without eventually going the extra mile, then simply don't fantasize at all.

I just fap to lolis because they're sexy.
I don't find real kids sexy at all.

But that guy is talkin bout fantasy as if it justifies CP
you cant police peoples thoughts and you really shouldnt. But there is a very fine line between fantasy, CP, and being a predator

lol the b8 in this thread.

This.
Lolis are completely fantasy, cartoon depictions.
Actual CP is actual kids actually getting hurt.

But isn't he talking about imagining having sex with kids? What's wrong with that? Obviously, it's less than preferable, but as long as it doesn't hurt anyone I don't see the issue. (Unless it leads to he/she actually eventually going out a raping a child.)

I disagree with the notion that loli and actual child pprnography are even close. One involves actually manipulating, coercing, and abusing a young person, the other is depicting an idealized fantasy, which by and large doesn't actually exist anywhere in the real world (by that, I mean that slutty teens and children who are actually interested in older partners), and harms no one. You can make your arguments about degrees of separation, and how loli at the very least tacitly encourages actual child pornography, but I and a lot of people are inclined to disagree for the same reason we have using for YEARS to defend unsavory contents in film, music, TV, and video games. This is 100% the exact same argument.

Kids with big eyes --> not CP
Good logic there.

For anime to be "kids" they would have to have an age. Cartoons have no age. For example, Bart Simpson has been "11" for over 20 years. Seems clear that if it's not a real person, it has no age and, therefore, through logic it is not CP.

...

Is this fucking bait?
For the sake of argument I am going to take it. There is so much wrong with that argument. Being a child is not a number. If you look, act, sound like a child, you are one.
Age has no play here. The depiction is what matters.

CP is actual children performing actual sex acts with actual people. You are treating a CARTOON DEPICTION with the same judgment. You remind me of the religious fundamentalists in the 90s who tried to ban so many dozens of programs on television by using this exact same rationale.

There's a few channels that are devoted to catching Cheez pizza eaters. It's excellent entertainment. Fucking cucklords who like to fuck children pissing their pants

I'm not trying to ban it. Just arguing that it is the same stimuli. You can fuck all your cartoon or children or figurines.

Baba Booey

kek did you listen to Stern yesterday?

Metal slug 3 final boss there

I just read all of this shit. What thefuck does this youtuber have to do with any of this shit

What does being similar in sensation have to do with anything? Would you also care to talk about the magnanimous difference in stimuli? In the same way that killing people in a video game stimulates aggression centers in the brain, we can argue that actual killing is "similar," but it's irrelevant to what you're trying to imply with the "similar stimuli" argument. This is nothing more than "slippery slope" argumentation, and it has been debunked to death.

He has a point though, you're probably an autistic neet who really does like shit like lolis and furry porn.

Bro, you doesn't have to go full fedora on me. Was it really debuked? By whom? Genuine question.

Also: you are satisfying your sex drive by jering to it.

Not him but being a pedo is wrong and a mental illness, period. No matter which way you try to put it, you're still a loser pedophile who is doing something wrong.

If you were getting off to killing people in games, yeah maybe it'd be the same thing and the person would need help. But as far as I know, people who play gta aren't jacking off while killing people in game.

nsa? nsa does not give a fuck, its fbi who you are refering to

with all the data they have they could do much more but they aint, which is good when it comes to survelliance but not so much when it comes to these poor kids and people ending up on darki

Pedos should hang. Period.

don't die on me