Win worth 3 points

>win worth 3 points
>draw worth 1 point
>nothing worth 2 points

What's going on here?

Other urls found in this thread:

spfl.co.uk/news/article/new-league-cup-format-announced/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>he's never heard of a draw-win

what do you think should be worth 2 points?

Nice try burgerbro

see it like this: by winning you get the draw-point of the other team and a bonus point for winning.

Draw should be zero points it should be the difference in scoring
Say its a 4-1 game thats three points
2-0 two points
7-1 6 points

win is worth 2 points until 90

Two goals

>burgers

2 points is for a draw plus a field goal in injury time

>game literally rewards you for not winning

obligatory

It rewards you for not losing. Moron.

...

That's called Goal Difference friend, that's the tie-breaker between teams with the same amount of points.

I should be Win is 3, Draw is 1, and loss is -1

It used to be two points, but it was changed to 3 to encourage offensive football and going for the wins. You used to need only two draws to get the same amount of points of a team that won one and lost another, so the incentive to risk it was small.

>americans & soccer episode 10, special making off bonus

0-0 ties should be worth zero points

That is some messed up shit man. Like fucked up man

how much for a pole position and fastest lap?

football is simple and perfect. don't touch it with your burger hands

>Euros claim to not understand this headline
>proceed to shit themselves in delight every time some garbage team draws with a big team

it used to be 2 for win, 1 for tie, 0 for loss

but it was changed to 3 for win to encourage more goals

now fuck off

spfl.co.uk/news/article/new-league-cup-format-announced/

>The group stage uses the traditional three points for a win and one point for a draw model however, in another innovation, all drawn matches will go straight to a penalty shoot-out whereby the winner of the shoot-out will be awarded a bonus point, believed to be a first in world football.

>the winner of the shoot-out will be awarded a bonus point
>the city of scattish fitbaw

How so? What's wrong with an extra incentive to play better offense and defense?

There already is you incentive you dumdum. Tie breakers are decided by goal differential. For example, even though Chile and Panama would finish with the same amount of points with a tie, Chile will advance because they have a higher goal differential

>park the bus for 3 games
>0-0 draw each game
>advance
how do we fix this shit?

But I'm asking what would be wrong with making goal differential = more points for the winning team?

>believed to be a first in world football
Mexican third division does this. Second division only gives the extra point, if the draw was 2-2 or bigger.

Because sports is about winning. Not meme stuff. There's already motivation to score more goals so there's no point. You would rather have a team with 1 win and 2 losses potentially advance past a 3-0 team. That's stupid

>kill Jester

But am I actually understanding this correctly?

>eight groups of five teams each
>play each other once
>win your game you get 3 points
>draw, go to pens and win you get 2 points
>draw, go to pens and lose you get 1 point
>lose you get 0 points
>then the eight group winners and four best runners-up progress to the second round
>"they are joined by the four UEFA qualifying clubs"(?)
>"and the competition reverts to traditional knock-out format" so it was all fucking pointless

Fucking Scotland

>team A beats team B
>team A gets more points than team B

Because it doesn't take into account the importance of consistency.

Having every game worth 3 points means that every game is worth exactly the same and has to be treated with the appropriate importance; having every game worth 3 points means that variables are reduced which could otherwise lead to a skewed result using the goal differential method.

Often a team that has a better goal difference than its point total suggests has done well against the poorer teams, showing the ability to soundly beat bad players - but consistently lost against the better teams. Should they be rewarded for their failure to beat the better sides in the league?

And that’s not taking into account the whole artistry of the game; it would be a fundamental change in how we think about football, though we do appreciate your input on the beautiful game and welcome any further suggestions

Alright, I could see how that would be flawed. Thanks for the replies.

Those good teams also have their chance to beat up on the small teams too though, it's not like the schedules are unbalanced

We award the worst teams in the NFL the best players retard.

>Still no multiball

you're getting grease and oil all over the beautiful game, fuck off burger

What you are saying is same as win=2 draw=1 lose=0

no, a win is worth three times a tie

>It's an american doesn't understand football episode

>Turkroach knows his math
I'm impressed.

How do we fix divegrass?

...

not the Cleveland Browns

Lets play multiball while we're at it brad

let me guess
we should also get rid of the offside rule and\ play multiball?

There should at least be ramps to kick the ball up or something. Maybe shoot penalty shots out of a cannon? Idk, just a thought

>Using GD before H2H

>teamA win 4-0 then lose 3 games by 1-0
>teamB win two games 1-0 and lose two 1-0
>teamA winning less games is somehow better

Why not:

Win = 1 point
Tie = 1/3
Loss = 0

>beating Rajo Vallecano 6-0 is worth six times more than beating Barça 1-0

>worst teams
>best players

Johnny "football" would like a word with you.

lol

I already explained this to him and he admitted it was dumb. Why did you feel the need to post this?

She's turned the weans against us

If you say "differential" you're a retard and should shut the fuck up.

That's what it is tho :^)

Do you even watch football? We have multiball in most professional leagues and internationals.

stop

all americans need to go spend a year living in a hut with a fire and some basic food

they are all overstimulated to oblivion.

The amount of ads during the NBA finals almost makes me pass out

AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

OH DON'T FORGET MULTIPLE BALLS AND NO OFFSIDE LOL

>England
>Big Team
lel

>Team A beats Team B which is really shit
>Team A wins the league because they scored a lot of goals against a shit team

WOOOOOOO

>it rewards you for not losing
This is why you lost the wars, Germany. Not enough drive to win.