Loli (cont)

Loli (cont)

...

...

...

...

I generally disdain the use of OCs in R34, but this, this I'll accept. Maybe in part because there's just not enough Lilo.

...

Oh boyyo here we go.

...

...

...

...

...

...

Stupid fucking chinks. Why is it blurred out? Like those 3 little pixels really help mask what's going on.

...

...

good post

...

...

...

...

...

This one is so simple but it's one of my favorites of nsfw tomoko

...

still have no idea

...

Which do you prefer lilo with??

Or with him?

I have an idea! I'm going to start a Sup Forums thread and use images from the last one! That should keep things fresh...

...

What the fuck is that rabbit thing

Obviously Stitch

...

shut up bitch

> (You)
>What the fuck is that rabbit thing
Not really sure .-.

It's a censorship law that deems any work that contains genitalia to be "arousing", and needs to be censored. The artist doesn't like this law, so they censor it as little as they can get away with.
Correct me if I am wrong.

...

ants

>Milf x loli
muh dick

...

i am a pedo and proud of it.
i want to anal rape kids
and i'm goin to do it

...

...

Forgot to mention, but I don't know if this law exists outside of Asian countries, or if it is for the most part exclusive.

Don't hurt children, you sick fuck.

...

Rekt

You're right. I meant to say I have no idea why the Japs passed that law. An insane case of coddling your entire country, why should 18+ the people porn is for, need censoring?! Still makes me mad.

...

...

...

i want to and i"m goin to

...

Get the dick out of your mouth and just post something that wasn't already here 5 minutes ago

...

...

stay strong brother

...

...

moar tomoko

...

...

Look at how freedom of speech is in the U.S.
If something is a call to action, incites lust, is slander, or deemed as obscene, all can be censored. Things deemed as "obscene" could be things that people all around would say is wrong, and could go to things such as what we have in this thread -Drawn images of children in sexual situations. Some people in power would say that this is "obscene", while some others would say it is an expression of free speech. Pornography could be deemed as "obscene", but isn't because it's been decided that it is an expression of free speech. In japan, I don't know their "free speech" rights, but as for the censoring of genitals, it would be the same as a court justice deciding that it is too obscene to be allowed.
>mfw I am near to failing my civics class

of course :) I was busy typing.

FUCK YOU

...

Have fun in prison, you fucking degenerate.

...

...

...

Which is obscene. I'm all about freedom, I thought America was supposed to be too.
Hope things don't get worse with these SJWs.

...

...

...

>implying it's the mythical SJW bogeyman and not paleoconservatives
If you're going to play identity politics, classcuck, at least be accurate

Sure it's both but the SJWs have been on the rise of a while now and are more of a concern these days.

I personally hate the exception of free speech that is obscenity. It's just way too obscure and the opinion of what is obscene varies widely. Of course things like child pornography should be outlawed because it's clearly abuse of a child, but outlawing it because it falls under being "obscene", and not just outright morally wrong is absurd to me. As for SJWs, they will kill off free speech if we let them, but for things like pedophilia I am pretty sure they are trying to make it something that is accepted. I believe it should be accepted, but only as long as the people who are accepted in society as "pedophiles" are non-offenders.

...

I honestly really like the discussion that has come out of these two loli threads :) It actually feels like a community. Most of the time I just see a bunch of shit.

...

...

...

Yup, pretty much agree with everything there.

I would go so far as to say however, that some 'cp laws' should be relaxed, and regular people with a clean record who merely have some images on their computer shouldn't have to face anything like prison on their lives ruined being on some kind of register.

...

...

moar pls

...

Continuing on just a bit from this, I would love for society to see the difference between monsters who abuse and take advantage of children, and people who are attracted to them, but won't ever do any harm to them. Harm, including things like a situation where the perpetrator might be able to say that "she was asking for it".

I do believe that some of it is a bit harsh. To me, the real monsters are the people who created the child pornography. I don't think real cp in itself should be made legal, because of the abuse of children to make it, but when it comes to things like lolicon or shotacon, which are just drawings that doesn't harm anyone or anything by itself, should be just fine.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Agree again.

...

...