You faggots will argue over anything

You faggots will argue over anything.

How many watermelons are there?

5.

5

...

5

5

8

Thats clearly 20 watermelons

9

5

Not enough information.

Seeds or seedless?

6

8 you never said full melons

5 melons

if you add up the amount of watermelon, you have 5 watermelons

if you count the number of unique watermelons it took to make the image, 8

OP is a nigger

2((2^2+1)/(2^2-1))((3^2+1)/(3^2-1))((5^2+1)/(5^2-1))((7^2+1)/(7^2-1))((11^2+1)/(11^2-1))...

6 no?

723048957209834759827349574.66

4x0.75+4x0.5
=5

bunch of retarded, the question was how many watermelons are there, the answer is 6. if you cut them all up you could combine them into the shape of 5 watermelons but theres 6 different watermelons in the picture.

8

There is the equivalent of 5 whole watermelons

there are parts from no fewer than 6 and no more than 8 watermelons

watermelons are a social construct

funf

>if you count the number of unique watermelons it took to make the image, 8

it can be 6 melons as well

it's 6. the 4 halves in the center clearly came from 2 melons, the 4 on the outside are 4.
6.

4, it's jsut a picture balanced on top of them

4*(3/4) + 4*(1/2)
= 3 + 2
= 5 watermelons

...

this nig gets it

How do you know that the halfs are the same watermelom?

5

there are actually only three watermelons, the rest of them identify as pumpkins

wrong, its 6. the 4 pieces in the middle was made from 2 different melons. 2+4 of the outside = 6

Yeah, and it keeps triggering me.

0, I consider a watermelon being one when it isn't cut.
So there is only watermelon slices

Assuming 360 degrees of 'visible melon' equals 1 melon, then there are:

(3/4 x 4) + (1/2 x 4) = 5

Assuming only whole, uncut watermelons count:

0

Arguments that suggest the visible melons are missing their bottom half are either blind or (far more likely) trolling, as the shadows confirm their presence.

/thread btw

5

Unless in the center there is 2 halfs, then correct answer would be 6

It's obviously 8, if anyone says anything else they are fucking retarded

these get full marks for completeness

...

6
Technically (.75 x 3) + (.5 x 2)

There are many watermelons, probably like millions or something?

4*(3/4) + 4*(1/2) = 5

my nigga

It could be 6 with your logic, or even 7, because you don't know where the halves came from. 2 watermelons? Or 4?

because i'm black. trust me, i know.

/thread
also checked

This is the simplest, most complete and accurate answer. The rest of you fail at math, life, and all of existence.

Approximately five collective watermelons worth of volume, however either six or eight individual watermelons, depending on whether the middle halves are halves of two melons or halves of four independent melons.

...

they aren't, the ones in the middle aren't quartered

Winner

...

(0.75 * 4) + (0.5 * 4) = 5
/thread

None. None of those pieces is a melon, only parts of melons.

could be halves from 3 melons for some reason

I bet OP is laughing his fucking ass off rn

...

You're right, since two halves could be from one and the other two could be from separate individual melons. Therefore covers it accurately.

TFW you try to make people argue but a vast majority of the responses you get can't be proven wrong

Nigger mathematicians get nigger grades in school

or even 7 (discard two halves)

This is what common core is responsible for, this level of "intellect"? It's a shame the people who push common core are degenerate, anti-Christian, Jews because using their own method you would have no problem explaining how Jesus fed 5,000 people with 2 fish and 5 loaves.

/Thread

5

winrar

There are actually 6 present.

4 have quarter sections cut out of them, 2 are cut in half.

However: You could cut the remaining amount to fill in the volume of 5.

3/4 + 3/4 + 3/4 + 3/4 + 2/4 + 2/4 + 2/4 + 2/4 = 20/4 = 5

...

There's either 6, 7, or 8 if we're talking how many watermelons were required to make this
If we're talking about adding fractions then there's 5
These are the only two answers and are both right depending on what we're looking for

6
4 sliced 3/4
2 sliced 1/2

9 (the remaining watermelons are stuck up my arse)

2, 3 or 4, depending on the central image

There could be 8 present, or even 7.

sum(x) = 5
6 ≤ x ≤ 8

I think I know how niggers feel now.

User with an IQ that is two standard deviations below average detected

All of them.

>/thread

...6.

Correct. 6-8*

Upon further inspection I am leaning more toward 8 now due to discrepancies in the watermelon strip patterns.

...

Want to buy a troll detector, you pleb

...

OP HQ leaked footage

5

0 whole watermelons
8 sliced watermelons
5 imaginary whole watermelons

We're on Sup Forums
It's just as likely that this faggot is retarded and not actually a troll

4 Melone.

4x0,75 + 4x0,25 = 4

5

if you answer in any number you are retarded... its a watermelon , you eat it... unless youre a farmer u just eat what you can and not worry about the rest.

...

But what is the halfes are from only 2 melons? Or 3?

Its either 5 or "go fuck yourself with this lacking info"

6, you can't magically fuse 1/4 slices

6

xD

Its 6

The 4 halves are in a box on top

Trick questions. Correct answer: None, those are nigger-pickles.

i disagree