Who's better?
France vs England
Other urls found in this thread:
The Eternal Anglo is called that for a reason, altho i do think that a world where France had the most global influence would have been a better one
Not really, look at Canada
Italy
The French were statist pansies long before they English were, so I'll give it to England.
Also, the French eat snails and then prattle on about their "haute cuisine" and how the rest of the world are culinary troglodytes by comparison.
Fuck France.
Snails are delicious you pleb
t. jacques
I prefer France
Burn in hell English scum
Up late, lad.
LAND OF HOPE AND GLORY
MOTHER OF THE FREE
HOW SHALL WE EXTOL THEE
WHO ARE BORN OF THEE?
WIDER, STILL AND WIDER
SHALL THY BOUNDS BE SET
GOD WHO MADE THEE MIGHTY
MAKE THEE MIGHTIER YET
GOD WHO MADE THEE MIGHTY
MAKE THEE MIGHTIER YET!
only cucks like france
L'anglais est un patois français
Les anglais sont des bâtards français
They tried to invade France several time through History, sometimes even turning the whole world against us. Yet we are still here. We couldn't care less about those shitty island jews.
French were cooler, but English looked less gay
you guys are pretty much the same thing, i see no difference between european wh*tes
France, obviously
putain de anglos
France has a nuclear carrier so it's their point.
Italy they is the real niggaz
bad post
good post
good post
bad post
bad post
excellent post
good post
bad post
bad post
TERRIBLE post
bad post
bad post
Canada is boring because it's not 100% French, lad.
Excellent post
t. a cuck
>implyin
>Paternity testing is regulated by the state and only allowed in certain cases:
>Without a court order the express consent of the person must be obtained in writing before the carrying out of the examination, after the person has been duly informed of its nature and its purpose.[18]
With a court order (if consent could not be obtained)
This is partially due to the official desire to "preserve the peace" within French families, with the French government citing psychologists who state that fatherhood is determined by society, rather than biology
Fucking defend this frogs
>The maximum penalty for carrying out secret paternity testing is one year in prison and a €15,000 fine.
Top Cuck
>Having a national sorry day
Defend this aussies.
Also :
>Australian music
youtube.com
>Having a national sorry day
Made up shit by leftists that doesn't actually exist
England practically conquered most of the known world.
>The Eternal Anglo is called that for a reason,
Made up by autistic Germans trying to deflect attention away from themselves and the damage they constantly inflict.
Britain is the only in world history to defeat Russia, India and China in war. And Brits burnt down the capital of the US. That is pretty cool.
>France vs England
>posts France vs the U.K.
Absolute state of the American education system
Because France hasn't tried to conquer Britain multiple times. Learn how to sail you miserable frog chewing munter.
The poorly educated kiwi is back.
Not an argument. Anglos haven't won a single war, especially against France though legitimate means, they always on numbers or others to fight for them.
>having allies is a bad thing
No, but taking credit for a victory that was achieved solely by one's allies is
He is literally retarded, don't bully him.
>achieved solely by one's allies
>solely
Wew, it's almost as if Britain was s naval power or something.
Navies don't count, silly. The sea only covers two thirds of the Earth's surface. It's irrelevant.
Frankreich. Gott strafe England!
Yeah, we were a naval power and we used lesser nations like Prussia and Austria to fight land campaigns for us.
After Napoleon France became one of those lesser nations btw.
>wew, it's almost as if Britain was a professional hiding-behind-the-sea-like-a-giant-pussy-and-get-its-shit-pushed-in-in-every-fair-fight country !
Based Germany knows
Ah yes.
>they always on numbers or others to fight for them.
So in other words they are better at war
None is better than the other, but both are better than the rest of the world.
>fair fights
>in real war
>ever
>fair-fight
Underage please leave.
Yes, have you never heard of Waterloo? that was one such example.
>fair fight
Ah yes.
>In September 1956, due to a common foe during the Suez Crisis, an Anglo-French Task Force was created. French Prime Minister Guy Mollet proposed a union between the United Kingdom and the French Union with Elizabeth II as head of state and a common citizenship. As an alternative, Mollet proposed that France join the Commonwealth. British Prime Minister Anthony Eden rejected both proposals
Reminder the EU only exists becuase the UK rejected a franco-british union proposed by France in which they would become subjects of the British monarchy.
The british also proposed it in 1940 after the... you know when we... hum how to say that
we - maginot line - germans
we - germans - maginot line
idk if it's clear
>a battle commanded by a British general which included 25,000 British Army troops and which had the French in a desperate position in large part due to the Royal Navy was won solely by the British allies
>a country which can apparently "get" other countries to fight "for" them is weak
Britain did try to fight on land, they didn't try again for quite a while
France because they've turned out surprisingly more useful in the natural sciences/computer sciences than all of Europe save for probably Kraut
You mean De Gaulle begged them to propose it to temporarily try and convince his government there was an alternative to surrender.
No, Churchill offered it himself.
>6,000 from KGL
>17,000 from Netherlands
>11,000 from Hanover
>6,000 from Brunswick
>3,000 from Nassau
and of course the 50,000 Prussians that arrived to save them
>The British opposed a French surrender, and in particular the possible loss of the French Navy to the Germans, and so sought to keep Reynaud in office. On 14 June British diplomat Robert Vansittart and Morton wrote with Monnet and his deputy René Pleven a draft "Franco-British Union" proposal. They hoped that such a union would help Reynaud persuade his cabinet to continue the war from North Africa, but Churchill was skeptical when on 15 June the British War Cabinet discussed the proposal and a similar one from Secretary of State for India Leo Amery. On the morning of 16 June, the War Cabinet agreed to the French armistice request on the condition that the French fleet sail to British harbors. This disappointed Reynaud, who had hoped to use a British rejection to persuade his cabinet to continue to fight.[1]
>Reynaud supporter Charles de Gaulle had arrived in London earlier that day, however, and Monnet told him about the proposed union.[1] De Gaulle convinced Churchill that "some dramatic move was essential to give Reynaud the support which he needed to keep his Government in the war".[2]
England choose self distruction so France
I never said Britain had the most land troops in that army.
But you said it was solely won by our allies (such as the Prussians who were late), which is a weird thing to say considering there were 25,000 actual British troops there from the beginning
>anglo-saxon
>not responsible for all the bad things in the world
Fucking shopkeepers. Capitalism destroyed the world.
>England choose self distruction
Explain pls
>surprisingly
????
>all these brit (you)s
Seems like I struck a nerve. You're called perfidious for a reason. In catch you would be the heel.
You owe everything you have to capitalism sonny
Stop playing stupid. Or if you aren't playing, stop being stupid.
Why posting if it's merely implications
>be britain
>dunkirk
>evacuate 100,000 frog """"soldier""""
>97,000 go home to surrender
Withoutt hésitation England is better at the art of betrayal and treachery. We have still à lot to learn from them
>be French
>escort the panicking anglos to dunkirk at the cost of your own life
>tell the anglos to embark first while holding the city
>60 years later the british education system is still shit
Brits had minds like Turing during 20th c
Brits make better beer, French better wine. Their armies are comparable. Both have great history and fine track of human right violations. Both have opinion of being snobby, and yet when you meet them in real life they usually great mates. Outside of the language French and British are very similar.
...
>I don't know anything about Dunkirk but will take a french youtube video as absolute truth
>most important battle of american revolution
>happens in europe
>britain wins
>I'm attacking the messenger rather than the argument
You mean after Britain invented the computer, computer programming, and the internet? Sure.
Scotland > Wales > England > Germany > France
>what is the highland division
UK
how is the population of gipusi in England?
What's your point lad? Just name-dropping a cherry-picked regiment?
>what is 1st free french division
>What's your point lad?
That the British army didn't just hide behind the French.
You have to go back.
Like it did at Bir-Hakeim?
>regiment
Fucking hell you retard.
>calling someone else a retard over a slightly impropriate use of a foreign word
Would love to see you giving a go at Finnish :^)
>Finnish
Useless language. You're alright.
At least my language hasn't been cucked by the whole world. Hang in there.
Stop using our language if you don't like us
Sacre bleu! The Brits created the modern world.
There was never a saying "The sun never sets on the French empire" now was there.
Ah yes, considering all the world class music, poetry, and prose, in Finnish, one can clearly see its superiority over English.
I agree with Poland on this one. They're both more alike than they'd like to admit.
>English
You spelled Bastard-French wrong
us
Both countries are full of faggots.
Both are fine
excellent post
horrendous post
Belgium
We also both promised to protect Poland from the Nazis
More like highly eveloved French, Latinate, Greek, and German.
ah yes the eternal yank starting shit as usual
...