Which one of these wars are you excited to see Sup Forums?

Which one of these wars are you excited to see Sup Forums?

listverse.com/2016/08/26/10-horrifying-future-wars-we-will-live-to-see/

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_border_conflict
ibtimes.com/india-pakistan-nuclear-war-would-kill-2-billion-people-end-civilization-report-1503604
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

The Chinese revolution is the most likely.

Why don't Russians join NATO or EU?

Chinese invading siberia is quite plausible, but that would prevent it.

>Beijing considers itself to have a historic claim to at least the eastern part of Siberia, and many ethnic Chinese are settling over the Russian border. For the Kremlin, this spells trouble.

Looks like they are going to get a taste of their own medicine

pakistan vs india

looking forward to a local nukeclear war

I think 5000 nuclear weapons can already prevent it.

We tried but got refused cuz HATO is anti russian

The great war in the north where Sweden reclaims all it's rightful clay and more.

Second cultural revolution

Sailing seas depends on the helmsman,
Life and growth depends on the sun.
Rain and dew nourish the crops,
Making revolution depends on Mao Zedong Thought.
Fish can't leave the water,
Nor melons leave the vines.
The revolutionary masses can't do without the Communist Party.
Mao Zedong Thought is the sun that forever shines.

>The China-Russo Siberian War
no, the idea is stupid

>The War For The Baltics
not gonna happen

>The North Korean Spring
Are you fucking retarded?

>Europe’s Urban Guerrilla War With ISIS
"""war""", anyway, already happening

>Venezuela’s Civil War
It's just state capitalism chill down, they gonna be just fine

>China’s Second Cultural Revolution
yep, kinda

>Bosnia Mark II
who gives a shit

>The Saudi Arabian Revolution
Of course some plebs will just overthrow one of the best equipped militaries

>The Indo-Pak Nuclear War
le nuclear war meme

>The South China Sea/World War III
It's a thousands of countries without any naval forces claim territory on an ocean which is basically ruled by the americans - edition
no, bullshit is going to happen

>Of course some plebs will just overthrow one of the best equipped militaries
They're so good that they're getting rekt by militias in Yemen.

>Bosnia Mark II
>who gives a shit
You when we get 2 million refugees
>Of course some plebs will just overthrow one of the best equipped militaries
t. Assad in 2011

Syrian army was no better equipped than anyone else in the area and Assad is buttraping those pleb's guts out right now.

Kill yourself cai-göran

this, Aleppo is /assadian/ territory now! ISIS BTFO

hopefully MAD applies

win/win for everyone

>NATO is anti-Russian
Then why are there many amicable treaties? You even had a Russia-NATO council. It was shortened after the Ukraine war, but it's not like it was horrible beforehand and the NATO war warring Russia right after 1991.

where is k*rdish genocide

>"""war""", anyway, already happening
You know what they were talking about.

>European ISIS guerilla war
It would start and live long enough to see the European governments turning into totalitarian anti-muslim regimes out of necessity. Minorities with Islamic backgrounds would be round up and either contained or straight up killed for reasons of security. Seeing the effects, terror attacks and the refugee crisis already have on Western society, a guerilla war within the streets of Europe would definitely lead to these measures. Either this or the country itself would collapse and regarding the strong right in France, Britain, Austria and a rising right wing in Germany, this is unlikely or will result in civil war (a risk, many ordinary people wouldn't be willing to take).

Europe's urban war against ISIS. It'll force the west to pull it's head out of their ass.

They tried to but NATO refused to let them join

>this much denial

He was doing horrible until Russia git involved and even then the west was hitting ISIS. On his own he couldn't conquer shit.

They've been fighting Turkey how long? You guys have been balls deep in it for a while.

And those cutthroats were doing even worse until you dropped them shitload of weapons.

I from Siberia. China will not attack us.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_border_conflict

GUYS! HE'S LIAR! CHINESE PEOPLES EVERYWHERE IN CYBERIA.

He's probably a chink himself.

>*autistic liberashka screeching*

This is not a Chinese. This south """"""Russian"""""".

God dammit NATO.

It's not so bad, my little John. If there is no competition between the USA and Russia in the aerospace and defense industry, will be sucks for developments.

You can call em yakuts, buryats, altaians, but the truth is they are INVADERS. They went to us for conquest our great territory and beautiful womans. They loves chineses with big dick, instead of russian fat bydlo.

Wake up, Ivan. You fucked up.

>The Indo-Pak Nuclear War
dis gun be gud
At least 200 million dead street shitters.

We need a rival, without someone to push us we wouldn't have gone to the moon. Without a rival we'll just get soft and decay into a 3rd world shithole.

not denying that conflicts will emerge, but not these specific ones

>The China-Russo Siberian War

Won't happen in 10 million years.

>Which one of these wars are you excited to see Sup Forums?

Saudi Arab Revolution, South China Sea War.

When Germany and France fight, which will lose again?

Delet this

implies one of us still had the will to fight

>Indians and Paks wiping each other out

>horrifying

Think of all the extra room in the streets!

ibtimes.com/india-pakistan-nuclear-war-would-kill-2-billion-people-end-civilization-report-1503604

I doubt much of that will happen.
I can however see the second Chinese cultural revolution. If there is a great recession like event in China, and the CCP responds with repressive measures it could easily turn into a revolution.
Of course maybe the Chinese are that brainwashed, and subservient already, who knows.

They have always been brainwashed sheep and still they start massacring each other by millions every few generations.

Why this article completely ignore nuclear weapons?

I actually am worried about Chinese cultural revolution. Communism is currently the only glue that keeps that country unified, and if it fails due to economy going south too hard, the Chinese will retaliate regardless of being indoctrinated by prevailing ideology. Please remember, the China as a unified nation is really not a normal state of being there has been historically.

However for now, an individual Chinese person may settle with what he/she has.

>that south china sea one
>tfw moving to Vietnam

Did you look at the entire article?

I didn't even open it. Why?

China has absolutely no territorial disputes with Russia. And buying Russian commodities is FAR cheaper than starting war.

>“A billion people dead in the developing world is obviously a catastrophe unparalleled in human history,”

this
China is content to send Han people over the border, buy up Russian industry, and basically keep Siberia under some degree of control as well as ensuring Russia stays off their back.

there is ZERO reason for them to invade aside from autistic map-painting

>"The Indo-Pak Nuclear War"
>"In winter 2008, the world nearly ended."
>Completely ignoring the Kargil War in which both nations had nuclear weapons and actually did go to war, but refrained from using nukes because they knew what a terrible idea it would be, and instead publishing a sensationalist narrative of what COULD happen based on no real precedent

Do they actually expect people to take this seriously or is it just clickbait? I'm confused

India and Pakistan Absolutely Positively Hate each other. Both of them also have nukes.

Which feeds trolls. Ok?