>1,200,000 Italians died in WWI
>500,000 Italians died in WWII
1,200,000 Italians died in WWI
so that means 1 700 000 italians died in both WW1-WW2
Good job Italy you did better the second time
You too
>1,700,000 in WWI
>600,000 in WWII
they also lost their dignity and manhood
>6 000 000 jews died in ww2
>600 000
Are you serious ? Damn, I really underestimated the numbers for WW2.
Sweden YES
100,000 French died in WWII
210,000 military deaths
390,000 civilian deaths
Why was WWI so much deadlier than WWII? I thought everyone just hunkered down in trenches and shit in WWI.
foy
Don't worry op, you know how it goes: l'erba cattiva non muore mai...
fucking SHITaly
>Why was WWI so much deadlier than WWII?
It wasn't
>Italians and French both had 1 mil plus killed
>other countries probably had similar numbers
>it wasn't deadlier
Enlighten me.
It was deadlier if you only count soldiers I think.
in the Battle of France you took down more german fighters than the brits on the Battle of Britain, and that was lacking basic radiocommunications in most planes
but history only remembers the victors for the most part
It was
Dysintery, other diseases, top brass new nothing so senseless death, poison gas, trench charges were dumb as fuck.
...
because they didn't do shit, one of them surrendered immediately and the other lost to Greece and some Ethiopians so they switched sides and they also weren't being systematically exterminated.
nope
you're welcome to post proofs
>Battle of France you took down more german fighters
Does that include the British aircraft that took part in the battle?
WWI had more military casualties, WWII had more civilian casualties.
did it? was it hurris or spits?
pic related was the main fighter of the french, the MS 406. kinda looks like a small fat Hurricane
I just did.
>military casualties WW1
around 17m
>military casualties WW2
around 15m, lots of them Russian
>other countries probably had similar numbers
what are you on about ww1 had about 10 million military deaths, ww2 had about 20 million post your sources
was south tirol worth the 1.2 million?
>making even austria look good at war
FINLAND
YES