S/fur

s/fur

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_Nazi_Germany
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

I wanna be inside a shark grills belly

It's a business... Freedom of speech does not apply.

...

...

TFF broken?

Капитализма.

*sigh* Yep. That's how it seems. And I guess people are going to be okay with that. What a shame.

floof and floof accessories

Eh, we won't miss you people over there.

...

...

>tfw often wish I was a girl but too many qualms to commit to transgenderism

>And I guess people are going to be okay with that
Nigga they have to.

Good to know.

Not really. They could always stay on FA.

You have to have a pretty strong willpower to go that route.

Cub is banned on FA as well. And Weasyl.

...

:P since when do Sharks have fur?

Oh, well, I wouldn't know. Still stupid.

Since I fucking made them.

...

Might want to research the topic you're debating, no?

...

...

...

Probably. I'm rather indifferent towards both websites as I don't often go to websites other than Sup Forums for fur, but whatever. I still find it ridiculous that cub wouldn't be allowed somewhere, as I'm a huge supporter of freedom of speech and anti-censorship, even if I don't actually care about it. But I can see why they would do it, cub fags are usually pretty degenerate anyway.

you mean to say...

there are no spider grills? ;~:

No, only Spiderman.

>s/fur
>lesbians
>no fur
???

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_Nazi_Germany

What about this?

...

...

...

Apparently there are legit people in the furry fandom that think that drawing a picture of furry cub porn is literally pedophilia and a crime. From what I understand, that's the heart of the issue currently.

Also, checking back in.

I know what you're implying. I'm not an actual Nazi, I just support some aspects of Nationalism as well as Socialism, so I combine them and say I support Nazi stuff just to be edgy. But I say if someone wants to do something, and it doesn't harm others, let em do it. Censorship is fucking retarded. Usually.

darn :c

...

...

It actually is illegal in some places, drawn or not.

Not surprised. Most furries don't seem to be very smart, myself included.

It's strange how humans prioritize morality.

...

...

I'm tired of stating the fact that there is no argument in favour of homosexual rights that doesn't also apply to pedophilia, necrophilia and zoophilia.

>It's strange how humans prioritize morality.
This. Why can't we all just be computers that prioritize logic instead of morality?

It always boils down to two consenting adults. In only one of your four is that the case.

It'll come around eventually. Once people start talking about and it becomes a big deal "oh, pedophilia is now legal". As long as you say shit to keep the majority complacent, it doesn't matter. Keep the people stupid.

Apply logic to morality. Done and done. Take emotion out of all things.

It's a logical argument if you ask me...

...

...

Shouldn't we not allow visual representations of other crimes then?

Nope. Censor everything, can't let our innocent little children's mind be corrupted by harmless art, no sir.

Why the discimination against non-adults?

I could easily justify being against homosexual rights by stating "It always boils down to two consenting adults... of opposite genders".

If humans prioritise morality, then why is unethical consumption under Capitalism still a thing?

Capitalism precludes morality to a large extent. Who the fuck cares if you're treating your workers nicely if you can keep making a zillion dollars off mistreating them and giving them shitty wages?

I guess I'll come back later...

...

Because so long as rape is still a thing, consent will still be the fulcrum point of all sexual relationships. But I do see your point. It's more the slippery-slope type argument.

Censor it all! Don't censor anything! Censor...some things? but not others? Yeah!

Censorship is such a fucking joke.

...

romantic bunny pics?

Unfortunately my collection is not arranged in such a way for me to provide /r/. Here is a doggy.

Oh wow, that is definitely not a doggy.

But why? You're precluding yourself from good discussion, and disallowing new knowledge and ideas to form. You're literally censoring yourself by not listening to opposing arguments. But hey, if you want to do that, then okay.

I've recently taken to censorship as a compliment/praise of sorts.

It shows that your argument is based on some concrete ground, and isn't just you talking out your ass, and that SJW shills don't want your concrete argument getting into people's heads for fear of breaking status quo of society.

Because letting me fuck a dolphin is such a big fucking deal.

...

...

And that is why I like you, Alex. You take all the bullshit morality out of arguments, and think only from an objective, scientific standpoint. I completely agree with what you're saying.

...

...

That, товарищ, is because I have no morality.

...

I can see how that could be a good thing in some cases. Someone has to play that role. Otherwise, discussion like this wouldn't take place and there would just be rampant ignorance.

...

I sometimes feel like a mad scientist. I naturally have high morals, but when I get down to thinking, they just go right out the window in favor of complete objectivity. It's interesting seeing my opinions on certain things change through discussion that are otherwise different when not discussing them, and having my moral compass shift so much.

And there's also that Amos Yee kid who keeps a youtube channel. Always voices unpopular opinions, always gets gag orders from the govt to take down aforementioned unpopular opinions.

But he don't give much of a fuck until the cops start personally visiting him and inviting him to the v&.

I don't know if his own rant videos have much logical argument in them, but from what I can see on public commentary of him, everyone's opinion of him is based on plain, blatant, ad-hominem personal attack. No real logical debate from the public.

I look up to that guy because he's got balls and isn't afraid of going against the flow. I don't look up to him for the opinion that he spreads, but that doesn't imply that I disagree with those opinions. In fact, I agree with most of them.

You don't know the meaning of true ignorance until you start realising that people spend $50000 on audio equipment and still doesn't know how electricity even works.

Ignorance is mandatory for Capitalism to succeed. Otherwise, people would be too smart to fall for marketing pitches and other consumer bullshit. Why else is Best Buy so popular despite having the worst products for the most crazy prices? Because they rely on the public's ignorance for their profit.

Capitalism - Taking stupid people's money since 500000 BC.

Well thank you anyways, your donation is appreciated!

...

>jumping to conclusions

Some say necrophilia is illegal because of religious reasons.

Why in the FUCK should you make something illegal just because of religion?

Should we ban pork products because Jews say so?

Should we ban liquor because Muslims say so?

Should we ban beef products because Hindus say so?

...

Necrophilia, at its core, is just a combination of trespassing on private property and defacing cemetery property.

It just so happens that both of those things involve breaking into a cemetery and fucking a corpse.

If the majority of an area is religious, of course the majority population will ban what they see fit. That's fair.
If you live in that area, leave and find where you fit in.

Less talk, more stronk!

That guy sounds pretty cool. I'm going to have to check him out, thanks.

You know, my opinions on Capitalism waver quite a bit. I feel like it's a good thing because, hey, if they're stupid enough to buy something, let em. That's where I think of true freedom. But at the same time, it's where my morals show. It feels wrong, and I think that those people shouldn't be taken advantage of by predatory corporations. I still haven't come to a conclusion yet. Let the inferior ones be eaten alive by the world and the natural order, or protect them in favor of keeping the current order alive. I'll eventually fall somewhere in the middle I suppose. I need to read more into philosophy it seems.

...

...

Howdy.

All hail lord of the shark bitches...

ayy

Perhaps I am, but my experience in looking through the consumer PC market over the years seems to highly suggest that conclusion is true.

People always think they need the latest and greatest shit, when in actuality anything mid-range from 5 years ago will do just fine. People always think they they need to upgrade every 3 years, when in actuality having a bit of know-how can save them the hassle entirely.

Okay.

Corpse burial, at its core, is just a combination of taking a person and then shoving them into a hole 6 feet deep, without their permission, therefore you have already shown blatant disregard for the deceased.

Assume the corpse has not been buried: In which case, according to you, it would be simply private property, yes? Who is the proprietor of said private property? Can he/she/they fuck the corpse? Can that proprietor also give another party premission to fuck it?

Necrophilia is a bit different, and my opinions on it are undecided. In my opinion, that is a case where consent is practically nonexistent, unlike some cases of pedophilia and zoophilia. The dead can't consent unless they literally signed it into their will that they're okay with it. Otherwise it's essentially rape. As for the latter 3, I do agree that they're stupid.

...

...

Most burials do happen with the deceased's permission, or the permission of their relatives. If you wish to have something different happen with your body, you are allowed to dictate what happens.

And yes, a human does actually turn into property when a person dies. Have you read the fine print when you bury or intern someone at a cemetery? They actually disclose what they are allowed to do with the urn/coffin. It's all a very rigorous transaction.

...

...

And I would argue that necrophilia isn't actually rape. It's just desecration, or destruction of property.

this