Girl photographed at 17 yrs 364 days old cp

>girl photographed at 17 yrs 364 days old cp
>girl photographed the day after not cp

Thoughts ?

Pic not related.

Why dont you just wait a day then so it wont be CP.

what about people born on leap years? hmm?

A clear border is needed for the "justice" system.

>picture was taken 5 seconds before midnight on the 364 day

As inconvenient as it might sound, the line has to be drawn somewhere. I believe that some 15 year olds look way more mature than some 25 year olds, but I am not the judge.

It is CP. If the photo was of her at 17, she is under 18 in the photo so she will always be under 18 in the photo. It will always be CP.

Damn boy you better count the exact God damn days she's been alive or you're in lock up real quick.

If we made the law "18 -1 day", you'd be asking "18 -2days?"
Line has to be somewhere.

For what reason is cp bad as long as the person is consenting ?

what about

>if she bleeds
>shes ready to go

that's a better law

I wonder what would happen if I take a picture of a naked girl, 23:59:59 the day before her 18th birthday.

Would a jury let me go since it's literally one second? I want to find out, but I don't want to risk prison for it.

Kids can be more easily manipulated into doing it.

There should be a test to determine the maturity and understanding of sex that 15-17 year olds can take which allows them to have sex legally.

Kek

Women who menstruate, men who cum. Doesn't have to be more complicated than that.

You locked up for real BOI

What if she emancipated her self from her parents at 17 and was on her own,and could enter into legally binding contracts by herself, is she not an adult and could do nudes?

society will never be in favor of that though.
Make it so only smart mature and alpha tier kids can fuck and nobody can say a word except out of jealousy.

...

nope. if the girl is 16 and MARRIED to a 26 year old, she can have sex with him legally of course. it is legal for her to take naked pictures of herself, but can not send or give them to her husband because he would have 'cp' confused? there is a reason these laws exist.

Not interested in little kids that's for sure. Just wanna be able to fuck/fap to 16yr olds with little titties in peace.

Im not talking about the emancipation from marriage.

Im talking legal emancipation from parents without marriage, which therefore grants them adult status and able to enter into legally binding contracts.

the reason they exist is to prevent predators from making 14 and 15 year old girls; pornstars.

A year is defined as 365.24 days, not the repetition of dates

You can't get married at 16 shit lord. Got why would you want to

the problem with definitive cutoffs is that there exists the chance, ever so slight, that people could be fucked over or saved because of it. if a guy rapes 100 children over the course of a year, and prosecuters can't get enough evidence to convict until a day after the statute of limitations, then the guy would get away with it even though he's totally guilty.

the law is still not on your side of the argument. it is still illegal for "minors" under the age of 18 to buy ciggs.

in some states you can get married at 15 with parental consent.

so we've got out marijuana recommendations and our sexual recommendations, thanks Docs!

if emancipated from parents, or if they have parental approval, you can get married when you're under 18. largely, it's used for kids who accidentally get knocked up or something and are pressured/are stupid enough to get married.
she can't even take nudes in that case. even if it's a picture of yourself, it's still considered production of child pornography. production, distribution, and possession are all individual crimes that you can get charged with simultaneously

Age of consent is 16 in most states, should be the same for porn

How come that the crime of having partaken in the alleged "holocaust" has no statute of limitations?

because it is not covered by the same rules and regulations

That's not what he's saying...

the age of consent is under 18 in many states, but that just means the STATE will not charge you. if you fuck a 17 year old in texas, the federal government WILL prosecute you. also i will add that if you EVER fuck a girl under 18 in ANY state, the federal government WILL prosecute you.

To be fair, one could manipulate an adult into doing it in a much easier way, I'd imagine. I'd just say "But I'll give you if you let me take a photo of you naked..."

And they do it, like every time. Some even do it for no money just because I asked.

that's only when the other partner is under 18-20, or something like that. not when there's a 5+ year difference in age
murder has no statute of limitations in the US. and the nazis were tried under international courts of law, due to the nature of their crimes.

in the US, there is no statute of limitations on child sex crimes.

My girl friends 17 and did that but its still cp either way . Its to protect those at the age that arnt fully aware of the consequences from nudes and sex . So fuck her but dont take pics

No idea op. Picture made me crack up though for some reason.

What if it's their birthday but you don't factor in the quarter of a day for leap year?

these threads always make me think, somewhere I probably have nudes from my ex before she turned 18, stored on a forgotten usb drive somewhere

i'm not an attorney, but i believe there is not statute of limitations for criminal prosecution. any idea?

You're fucked fam

A case like this would be thrown out even though its technically true.

No manner of law enforcement is going to go through the trouble or tax dollars on anything like this.. youd have to be a super dik of a dad pushing some serious cash for a kid who was banging your daughter to get something like this even considered for possible criminal charges

Actually, in states like Alabama, it's legal for a 16 year old girl to fuck a 30 year old dude.

The problem comes into play if they can be accused of doing something to 'corrupt' them. Not the actual sex anymore. The sex is 'allowed' at 16, with what ever partner the 16 year old consents to.

Say however, the 30 year old dude gave her alcohol. Oh shit niggas... you going to jail.
Gave her cigarettes? Jail.
Weed? Jail, for more than one reason.

Kept her out late, drove her somewhere, took her anywhere, etc. without her parent's permission? Very possibly jail.

Any precedents of this? I'd be interested to know. I was pretty sure that in-state stuff was left to states. I wasn't aware we had a national age of consent law in the USA.

I fucked a 15 yr old when I was 19...
She sent nudes and all that.

Rekt?

i doubt a DA would want to press charges. now if there were other crimes involved? like drugging, rape, aggrevated sexual assault they would throw the book at you. i dont think a DA would press charges if it was just a random sexual encounter.

Age of consent should be around 14-15.
16 at most.

Exactly

dpends on the legislation of the country

>any precedents on this?

google search. many people falsely believe that they can just fuck a 17 year old in texas, but end up in prison.

Yep...
Laws like this are weird, and would generally be unnecessary if people weren't usually assholes.

Under AoC in your area? Don't touch that.
Under 18 / Age of Majority in your area? Hit that, but don't take pictures.
Over 18 / Age of Majority in your area? Hit that, and feel free to take pictures; but make sure to get her consent. A lot of states have laws about 1 or 2 party consent for recordings, etc. It's complicated.
Over 18 / Age of Majority in your area and you're paying her for it? YOU BETTER BE RECORDING THAT or it's illegal. (Porn is legal. Being paid for porn is legal. Being paid for sex (prostitution) is not.)

Sauce is Milena D Sunna

Hey Sup Forums lets say that this friend of mine, he was sexting with a 15yo grill, she took a photo of her vagina and send it to him can I go to jail?

M-mods?

fuck off newfag

Youre considered a legal adult at the 18th year of your life. If a leap year, im assuming febuary 28th or march 1st is the days used

she can go to jail for creation and distribution of child pornography.
That is, she could if she was a boy, women are immune from sex-related criminal charges.

Nice, thanks

Wrong

Several women have been tried and convicted for that very thing.

short answer is yes. if someone sent you pics of underaged girl it is cp. by law you would have to report in within 48 hours to the fbi or police, they would give you instructions on deleting it. if you did NOT report it in 48 hours, that is another felony. so short answer is yes, unless you reported it and deleted it within 48 hours. are they likely to hang you for it? doubt it. it largely depends on how angry the DA is with you. if it's a pic of a 11 year old, your going to prison. if it's a pic of a 16 year old, they will likely put you on a list, but won't prosecute.

You could apply that logic to literally any age limit. But they have to draw the line somewhere.

they are not 100% immune, but they might as well be. very very few women are charged with child sex crimes, and the few that are, were repeat offenders mostly, who were a "threat" to society. look at how women are NEVER charged with filling false rape reports. 1 out of 50000000000000 cases is a female charged.

Not in my country
Not American tho, but thanks

Name one

Seriously name one

There are also acceptable age gaps. 4-5 years I believe in the law...

Yeah, very rare a DA would press charges if you say, did a girl the day before her birthday or something. Eh, even if you had a picture / pictures or video of it... probably not. It's a lot of paperwork. (Unless daddy/mommy is rich. Then you're fucked if she was 18 even. You're just fucked if you piss rich people off usually.)

Now, if you distributed it professionally like in porn production? Oh, hell, they're gonna make an example of you.

Texting nudes to your buddies though? Probably not even then. I still wouldn't fucking do it though if I were you. Laws are weird. Try to stay within them. There are already enough of them that they can arrest you at almost any time for 'something'. At least don't make it easy on them to find something to charge you with.
I've never seen a case where anyone was prosecuted for having sex with a person over the age of consent in their area, in the USA, and there were no other crimes involved. As I said though, 'other crimes' can be almost nothing. Took her for a drive? Oh, kidnapping! Or some shit like that.
Seriously though. Why would someone take pictures of underage girls, and then distribute them? Like, it's just plain stupid. At least that law is easy to understand and pretty well known. Like "Don't kill." "Don't photograph minors without their clothes on," is pretty easy to understand.

Though, I'd agree that the laws need to be adjusted now that social media and stuff is a thing, or we risk kids ruining their lives because they took a selfie naked and sent it to their boyfriend in high school. That's not protecting kids. That's punishing them for being inexperienced / naive. Not good.

Costa Rica :^)
You can select when you get the majority of age here, the 28 of february or the 1 of march

My mistake. I only like anime porn. :P Don't know IRL porn stars.

Then it would still be defined as 365.24 days with an error of less than a day

Neither do I, but calling the MODS even for real CP is only newfaggery

Unless you live in south Louisiana. The government will do ANYTHING for a buck right now.

I doubt anyone will push that hard for a crminal investigation.