let see how dumb Sup Forums is
Let see how dumb Sup Forums is
Other urls found in this thread:
undefined.
7
7
Divisions and multiplications first, then summing and subraction from left to right, 7
hope you get an a+ on finals op
5 and go kill yourself
5! The answer is mutha' fuckin' 5!
Didn't even use a calculator. I'm a fart smeller!
7
1
retards
So 4?
21
This.
Answer is 7
That would make 5
Working without bed as would be 1. With bedmas I don't give a fuck.
6-1x0+2/2
6-0+1
6+1
7
7
Y'all niggas need PEDMAS
Wrong
Error:
6-0+1 = 6-1 = 5 and shit
Thats made up. The answer is 5
I GOT THE ANSWER RIGHT. I DEMAND A PRIZE!
youre retarded
yes. 4.
Told you guys
Adding and subracting is done from left to right dipshit
0 by -1 doesn't give -0 m8
1
it's 2 lmao
7
whoever thinks it isn't seven didn't go to fucking grade school
if u get any number besides 1 you are fucking retarded and should kill self
7
Source: Highschool math
its -2 you stupid fucks
it's 4
...
/thread
Bait
Gr8 b8 m8
PENIS
Please explain why it's 4
I hate this notation, because it's not clear if the whole thing to the left is divided by two, or if the two itself is divided by two.
Use better notation then come back, faggot.
kek
the answer is 5(without looking into the comment section)
my guess would be he selectively used PEDMAS. 6-0+2, then divided that total by 2. That and he's a mongoloid
The prize is you get called a fag.
Fag!
Fucking idiot you don't do 6-0+1 it's just 6-1
It's 1
>1-0=-1
Get real lad
7
6-1x0+2/2
= 6-0+1
= 6+1
= 7
Writing an expression ambiguously in math terms is not the correct way of testing intelligence. Without parentheses, you would have to follow order of operations strictly and not take the shortcuts you would take with parentheses. It would have to go left to right PEMDAS.
A real test of intelligence would be to solve the Helium Atom.
/thread
>6-0+1
>6-1
And if you follow the orders of operation you should get 7. Here is a calculator result to show that any tricks you are trying to pull as far as the ambiguity of the problem goes are unfounded and wrong.
I have 6 oranges
I remove 0 oranges
I then add 1 orange
How many oranges do I have?
Exactly, faggot.
It's 7.
Moving on to adult math...
I'd like to see who can solve the following math problem.
Pic real-estated.
c'mon! It's easy!
MIT student here.
6-1x0+2/2
6-1x0+1
-1x0+7
-1x7
-x7
-7x
1
why, you would simply laplace the bitch, would ye not captain? Hell, while we're at it, we should check if she's BIBO stable!
Set the limits to infinity, and see if we reach land.
Are you sure you're not Career Point?
The answer is one
It's alright to use a Laplace Transform. I'm just seeing if anyone can provide an answer. I already did it on my calculator, so it's not that big of a deal.
5...that wasnt even difficult
the answer is the bootstrap paradox.
nigger
okay, you pussies. Here is the solution.
6-1x0+2/2
6-0+2/2
6-0+1
6+1
7
if it isn't that difficult why did you get it wrong you fucking retard
Liar
you fail
ya i'm laying in bed i'm not doing it. I went through the hell of a signals and systems analysis class last semester so I've been drilled into knowing laplace, fourier series/transforms and z transforms.
7. 3rd grade math. Fucking autists.
P E M D A S
a x u i d u
r p l v d b
e o t i i t
n n i s t r
t e p i i a
h n l o o c
a t i n n t
s s c i
i a o
s t n
i
o
n
very nice
good job
Niggers, you literally learned this in 5th grade. PEMDAS. Answer is 7.
I feel like everyone getting it wrong is just baiting.
Explanations aren't excuses, Sup Forumsro.
Either do it, or shut the fuck up.
4
hahah, no you faggot. I'll go to sleep knowing that my electrical engineering degree will be more rewarding than doing stupid math tricks on the internet
kek
you basement dwellers are suppose to be smart the answer is 5
show your work