Is it bad that I feel a bit of sympathy for criminals, even ones who commit supposedly unforgivable acts...

Is it bad that I feel a bit of sympathy for criminals, even ones who commit supposedly unforgivable acts? I don't wangbto, but I do

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensing
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You're just sympathetic, I can feel sorry for their past selves when I hear about what caused them to become the people they are today. That's about it.

Bump

It is the opposite of bad.
We think like this in Norway, where we rehabilitate our prisoners instead of punishing them. There are no good and bad people. There are only people who grew up under bad conditions and those who didn't

Everybody wangbto tonight!

I'm guessing my sympathy stems somewhat from me fearing bring hated by people. I can't imagine being hated hard by the public.

You do get the rare person whom doesn't have anything wrong with their childhood and they end up bad

Then don't do anything so bad to be targeted by the public, people make the choices and put themselves in those positions 9/10.

Interesting. You Norse seem really advanced in many aspects
This is true. Some just snap for some reason.

Yeah. OP here. Worst thing I did was shoplifting and consume weed edibles

Yes, rarely. They can still fit into society with the right psychological help

Yeah see that's fine, small time drug things don't even bleep on my radar, same thing with state rape for me.

Honestly if they've killed someone I'd say the deserve to be punished instead of being let out in the public. Good example is the James Bulger murderers, I'd have been fine with them being shot rather than allowed to live.

You mean statutory rape? It still seems bad for me, but not as bad as violent rape

OP, that actually happens to be highly moral trait
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensing
here you have an example of bacteria, which actually mastered it and it works perfect for them

I don't even consider it a crime, as long as the person was happy with it (consented) I don't really care about their age. It's not even rape it's just that they're 'unable' to consent, which is silly since the age of consent varies between country to country so suddenly a 14 year old can consent but a 15 year old can't in another country

They can't really consent to an adult because the teens lack the life experience of adults to understand sex. Hell, their brains aren't even fully formed yet. Adults also have a position if power over the teens by simply being an adult.

I'm so glad that it's not up to you.
You mind is set on "revenge" or "justice" instead of compassion, which is the best option for society. If you had gone through what they had gone through, you might have done the same

It's not all that hard really and I've met plenty (and I mean PLENTY) of adults that don't understand how STI's work. It's actually rather amazing since we seem so afraid to talk to young adults about proper sex and protection because we're afraid they might start sleeping together.

I think it's the mentality that at the age of consent, boom that's when everything becomes clear, that's when they are now mentally capable of consenting (not the week before, not even the DAY before) and that's when they become sexually active.

Honestly if they're fine with it, there's no harm.

They didn't go through that much, something like divorced parents and slight beating, doesn't really excuse kidnapping a little boy and torturing him to death.

Oh and btw, they sexually assaulted James and now one of them has been done several times for child porn.

I feel like it's fine of the adult isn't some 40 something year old creep

and if the underaged person happens to find that 40 year old sexually attractive?

They may consent, but in most places they're still not adults. If I was their parent I'll ban them.

I can sympathize unless it's a nigger then they deserve everything they get.

But that's what I mean by this it's not like at some age suddenly it all becomes clear and they become sexually active. Everyone's different, some people hit puberty young and become sexually active younger than some and suddenly they can't have sex because it makes some people uncomfortable?

You don't know their story. People aren't born evil.

It makes parents uncomfortable. It wouldn't be good parenting if they didn't care this much

What if the nigger saved your daughter from being chopped up and raped?

>You don't know their story

Uh huh, unless they were gang raped by Mum and Dad's friends from birth to then, I might be able to accept it but anything less than that, sorry they don't deserve to live.

I think sex makes any family member uncomfortable, some people don't like the idea of their parents having sex, others don't like the idea of their daughter, who's 20 years old getting fucked by her boyfriend.

Not really up to them, as long as the person is safe and happy with the sexual act what's the problem?

I'd be willing to listen to this.

But to be honest, there are moments where you see people that, for all the conventional means that exist today... there is no changing them. There is no "saving"/saving them. There is no deterring them, even.

You could look at the smile on someone's face, after they've gone and torn a live puppy apart in order to reach a screaming orgasm. Their brains are just simply... wired that way. Something has changed, something exceptionally fundamental. The brain isn't static, but creatures of habit tend to avoid change. To try to undo the neurological quirks or the mental folds raises so many ethical questions, on top of actual questions as to how one would even achieve that.

I'm sorry, but there will be moments where I would most definitely feel bad, but pull the trigger nonetheless.

Just donate their body and brains to science. They can experiment on their brains. If they due, you'll still get your wish of a painful death

This is why I hate humabs. We're always deciding who lives, and who dies, not realizing that people like this will always show up. You can't have good people without bad people. I feel like we need a mass extinction event to get rid of our problems.

Don't feel sorry, you're allowed to have an opinion. Though i hope you will see it differently one day.
That is incredibly narrow minded of you user.

I'm struggling to keep my eyes open atm. Have to get some sleep. Gn anons

Huh? It's not my wish to deliver a painful death... it's just that I wouldn't exactly hesitate to execute someone of that... caliber. There exists a measure of danger to surrounding human lives from my perspective. When I allegedly perceive that an individual is capable or is otherwise set to cause great negative affect to the mean group of x or y or all people... well...

Whatever the execution would be, I'd have to give it the green light for the most extreme cases. Death, or deaths? Pain, or pains?

>You can't have good people without the bad people

What's "Good"? What's "Bad"? Why can't you have a bunch of "Good" people who don't deviate above the hard limit of x or y? Why does that seem implausible?

Is it because contemporary life presents otherwise? If so... what good would an extinction event do for us? It would seem like there would just be more "Good" and "Bad" people.

This was a nice discussion. Thanks anons.

It's a yin and yang situation. For every gandhi, there's a hitler or stalin. It's human nature to have barbaric trauts. Get rid of it all, no problem will exist.

So, this binary system is unique to human beings only?

Does this make the alleged altruists "mutants"?

I gurss. But it's a cycle that doesn't stop. Judging by history, you really can't have one without the other