It's not $1.50 retards

it's not $1.50 retards

if it's not 1.50 it's unsolvable.

It's 2.

Well whats the original price then fag

$1 is the original price, retard mcgee

$ tree fiddy

Only if you failed badly at basic arithmetic. It's 1.50.

OP wants people to think he's smart.

Then its 1.50 kys retard

x = 1 + 0.5x
0.5x = 1
x = 2

a game (x) costs 1+ 1/2(x)
x=1+ .5x
.5x=1
x=2

suck my dick math nerds

Sakura Dungeon costs 17,99e on steam

What the fuck am I retarded for?

>it's

IT + IS = IT'S

Otherwise it's ITS

There is no ITS'

Are we clear on this?

$1 if you're giving it away.

It actually is 2, because 1 is the half of 2. 1 plus the half of 2, which is 1, is 2.

its clear to me user

Your wasting you're breath. Their not going to understanding, there too stupid.

2

Nice bait queer

Heheh

It's price isn't determined so you can't go from there. Dipshit.

Exactly what I said. OP is a dumbass

...

bait.jpg

No you're trying to determine it's price. So there is no referance for "it's price".

If you're selling for $1, then it's $1.50.

>half of two
>half of it's price
>game isn't two bucks

Its 4 you asscunts!

1 + x/2 = x
2 + x = 2x
x - 2x = -2
-x = -2
x = 2

1 + 2/2 = 2
1 + 1 =2
2 = 2
x = 4

>A game costs $1 plus half it's price.
>it's price
>it's

The spreading of stupidity continues.

...

right so the best way to think of this is to think of it like programming

price= $1

price= price+(.5*price)
price = 1+(.5*1)
price = 1.5

it doesn't loop. its just $1.50.

Let's say it costs 1$ => the price is 1,5$
But then it costs 1,5$ => it's actually 2,25$
But then it's 3,375$
=>5,0625$
.
.
.
Therefore the price is infinitly.

nice logic

>2=2
>therefore x=4

Fellow Redditor, this is a bait thread. Kindly disregard.


Yours truly,

Steven Brownstein

they aren't selling it for $1 though

they're selling it for $1 plus half its price

Damn what a bad bait

>2=2
This statement is unmistakenly and undeniably true.

>x=4
Where did that step come from?

the final price is x

it costs $1 plus x/2

so

x = 1 + x/2

-x/2 from both sides

x/2 = 1

multiply both sides by 2

2x/2 = 2

x = 2

Total cost is $2

Source: I'm a math teacher

$60 + DLC

1.75

Not bait tho

trick question that fucks with the brain's ability to distinguish between language, and math.

i refuse to answer it cause fuck you, really.

1+(1/2x)=x bullshit problem op

/thread

"Plus half it is price."
So... $.50. Obviously.
Cause the other half isn't price.

>it is price
And you're calling others retards? Kys

Please Google "it's possessive" and redo your last English exam

it's $1 faggot

it's saying that
x = (x/2) + 1
2x/2 = x/2 + 1
1 = 2x/2 - x/2
1 = x/2
1*2 = x
x = 2
Now, that's asuming that the price and what it cost are the same thing. If we take it literal tho, then it's y = x/2 + 1

its not bait its a fact
its $1 plus half its original price
so the original price is X

so the problem is 1/2 of x plus 1

that cant be solves without more information

Falling for the bait
How's summer?

Han?

?

It's [PAUL MCARTNEY WILL DIE ON SUNDAY EVENING] $2

nvm

>911

X = 1 + X/2
-X/2 from both sides
X-(X/2) = 1
x2 multiply it all by two
2X- X = 2
Simplify
X = 2
Checks out.

Nope
By your logic
1+.5x=0
.5x=-1
So x=-2
So suck my dick

x = 1 + 0.5x

Subtract 0.5x

0.5x = 1

Multiply by 2

x = 2

Why is that so difficult?

you do realise you didnt double check it
you just repeated what he wrote to check it you need to plug in 2 in the spots where x is

c=1/2p+1

Cause it's worded like butt.
That's the point.
It's actually a fucking English problem witha little bit of math.

There's no answer. Neither 1.5, neither 2, neither 4.

How tall are you if you know you are 6 ft tall plus 10% of your height?

Are you infinitely tall or infinitely retarded?

it doesn't have a price because it's value is always changing to infinity.

It's $31 you retards

He did it one way, I did it another we got the same conclusion. That'd proof positive dick sweat.

No, it costs half it's price plus $1. They're selling it for some unknown amount. It's a two variable problem.

cost = 1 + price / 2

when cost = price:
cost = price = 2

when cost =/= price
cost = price / 2 + 1.

...

Is it $1 before or after taxes that the question

than plug it in and show it works o wait

This is just a stupidly worded question that is trying to trick people.

smh fam desu kek

Flip it around and it becomes: A game costs half its price plus one dollar aka (price/2)+1. Fucking retarded is what I call it.

Before AND after.
Oooooo.

it's clearly two how can you guys be so stupid.
A game cost a certain amount of money. This money is equal to one dollar plus half of it's price. 2 is the only situation this works.
You guys are retarded
It's not being sold from 1.50

Three fiddy.
Bacon.
42.

Those are all the answers. One of them is bound to be correct.

In your face, Milwaukee!

X = 1 + (X/2)
2 = 1 + (2/2)
2 = 1 + 1
Happy knobgoblin?

$1 + half * IT = price
$1 + 0.5 * IT = price
0.5 * IT = price - $1
IT = 2 price - $2

Well let's do math even a Trump supporter or flat earth tard could do;

$1.00
$1.00 * .5 = $0.50

So...

$1.00
+
$0.50 = $1.50

And back to kindygarten wit ya!

e - 1

c= 0.5p +1
No reason to think c=p

Lol that can be solved arithmetically.

A game has no price.

do you even word problem. If that was how the equation worked it be an infinite loop

Uhm, my post isnt actually bait... But i really hope 90% of the people posting here are baiting. Otherwise Sup Forums has a serious lack of education. I mean come on!this aint rocket science folks.

Infinite loop.

Nothing, I don't pay for games.

log xy= log x + log y = 9000

Alternative;
It's supposed to have a different outcome, but it's so poorly worded that the original $1.50 is the only one that works without delving into autistic levels of artificial maths.

That's the fault if the person who wrote it, not the math.

it's $2.25
$1.50/2=$0.75
$1.50+$0.75=$2.25

A rocket cost $1 plus it's price.
How much does it cost?

It is now bitch.

x = 1 + x/2
x- x/2 = 1
x/2 = 1
x = 2*1 = 2

Let f(x) be a recurring function for which we have that:

f(x)_0 = 1
f(x)_n = f(x)_(n-1) + f(x)_(n-1)/2
3/2 * f(x)_(n-1)

In general we have that f(x)_n = (3/2)^n. In the limit the game is infinitely expensive.

it's 2 idiot

Its is right here you retard

f(x)_0 = 1
f(x)_n = f(x)_(n-1) + f(x)_(n-1)/2 8===>~~
3/2 * f(x)_(n-1)

Didn't show work put into each step. 1/4 point.

#include
int main()
{
int price = 1,value = 0,result = 0;
char string[] op = "Yes";
value = price / 2;
result = price + value;
printf("Is op a Faggot: ",op,result)
return 0;
}

Except cost and price aren't used to denote the same number in the question.

This means that
op a Faggot: Yes1

Op sucks dick for $1

x=22/7