Need help with math homework, faggots. I'll post my nudes if someone gets it right ;P

need help with math homework, faggots. I'll post my nudes if someone gets it right ;P

Other urls found in this thread:

integral-calculator.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

1 = 1

Math done

integral-calculator.com/
do it yourself

=404

Look here, nigger. I need to learn this shit.

y=-2
You wrote positive

...

9/6 = 3/2, you ignorant faggot.

Approximation: 8.606609071677304

top kek

thanks babe. no nudes. OP=fat dude

and if you dont understand it, just graph the function

when expressed in terms of x you only get half of the squareroot function, and thus only one intersection

You found the intersection of y not x

This. So much this.

Same thing you're probably just used to the other way around.

I suppose only one rule holds eternally true: OP is a faggot.

Try in respect to dy or solve for x intersctions

>y^2 - 3y = 10
>y = -2
>kek

I am winrar now deliver op

I would like to direct your attention here and here

...

Correct answer is:

343/18=19.0556

Op we know where you live
Deliver!

i live at the Breezehome in Whiterun, faggot. Come find me bitch.

What the fuck did you do, you gaylord?!?! You dun goofed!

Solve as a function of y, find the points of intersection, then find the difference between the integrals of both functions between those points?

Im fucking right do integral -2 to 5 (3+y+1/3 (1-y^2)dy = 343/18

The error in your math is you found the points for y not x and you did the integral respect to x dx

Ok if you want

as promised

This guy and skipping most of the fucking function so he can use his derpmath calculator

Lern2Calculus

...

I did it for maths

also..yes..error with da boundaries of integration..as pointed out. forgivable.

Determine should be {5, -2} not {5, 2}

False!

im not posting my nudes. for one, im a guy. for two, my bother is on this thread

i think u r right

you right, bruh

Well
fuck

>my bother
>bother

There you are you gaylord. Now nudes!

>Didn't express you're values as rational numbers
Who's the gaylord now?

bounds of integration are wrong.
go from -2 to 5.

Op underage fag this is for 15-16 year olds, 17 max if op is ameritard

Hes right, but stupid. Went full retard and solved for x. And beyond that, there is only 1 intersection; the first function is a square root of a variable which is non-contunuous between negative and positive infinity. It starts at x=-1/3. The lower bound then is necessarily that value. The upper bound is the intersection at (8,5). So integrate from -1/3 to 8 in terms of x.

Solving for x first you must integrate from 0 to 5 in terms of y. Can be done. But why bother with making y the dependant variable?