Ask an Italian mathematician everything

Ask an Italian mathematician everything

Are Italians called stallions because hey have big dicks?

Give me a proof that
>One plus one equals two

What's 2+2?

What's your field of research?

From which century?

15.71 cm average, only France has bigger penis in Europe, but they have niggers.

Ask me a question

4

why are Italians so greasy?

Geometric Analysis and PDEs

23th century, user. Clinton won.

Why do my spaghettios make lightning?

whats the biggest fucking spaghetti

They aren't. Why do you say that, user?

Can you show me proof that one plus one equals two?

Please remove the pics, it hurts my feelings.

Dunno. We have too many kinds of pasta here

Post picture of your asshole w/ timestamp

Are you zongo the matematitian?

Are you referring to the autistic proof of Russell?
I don't know it user, but it's type theory faggotry

...

What's this monster

No, sorry

Could you help me out with exercise number 2? I'm interested in b) and c)

No OP.
That's just crappy american movies.

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

I'm just saying
1+1=2 is an axiom
Not proven but just taken as a fact
If you can't even prove that, why are all of you guys thinking you can work other stuff out?

7

Is OTP a true encryption? In a mathematical manner?

Dunno really, but a friend of mine does this stuff.
I think you have to use the residue theorem or something like this

Yeah, he's probably asking about his proof from Principia Mathematica.

What is y when X=4/5?

Is it mathematically true that the sum of all natural numbers is -1/12?

And on a more personal note: what's the deal with curl? How does it (intuitively) relate to anything useful, like flux?

Fucking romanians

Inches bro, inches

You don't need to use the residue theorem for it, but there is a nifty trick with a Laurent series that can be used to prove it.

2

>any mathematical question could easily be answered via Google search engine.

What do you do as a mathematician?

See

>Is it mathematically true that the sum of all natural numbers is -1/12
No, because the Dirichlet series definition of the Riemann zeta function is only valid for complex numbers with real part greater than one. However, it is true that ζ(-1)=-1/12 by analytic continuation.

how do i get my pasta adente?

I will sove it for you, 10$.
All the steps required to do it.
I take paypal.

Are you Romanian, user?
However for 2 c) you have to integrate by parts, while for 2 b) i think you could prove to use the substitution x= (cos t)^2, it should works

Sorry, but the axioms are others. 1+1=2 is a theorem, not an axiom. It can be proven "easily" via set theory.

Let's see if you're really Italian, user:

Che film comico fanno ogni fottuto anno a Natale?

Fuck off nigga you just gonna use symbolab

>How does it (intuitively) relate to anything useful, like flux?
Maxwells equations, anything involving fluid flows.

Yes I'm Romanian.

kek

Research in mathematical analysis

Wait water to boil before setting pasta inside the pot. However it's "pasta al dente"

Can u divide by zero

>Italian mathematician everything

Don't need to, we already know that the first desk top size computer was an italian olivetti. You can't beat that......... or something.

I don't need to. I write it on paper, if it makes you feel better.
I can give indications at any step, but that is 15$.

(btw, matematica is better)

Vacanze a sto cazzo

Are you undergraduate?

Explain Szpiro's conjecture to me.

Don't be a bastard and do it for free

Algebra is for faggots, sorry

>What is 1 divided by zero

can u explain me soome example of Hamiltonian An

That f@g ain't even in university.
Not even finished secondary.

Do you work for some university?

It doesn't exists but we have many theories in which something similar is allowed

what's the biggest number you counted to?

I've graduated highschool a few weeks ago and I'm having the stupid bac in 2 weeks.

7

Hamiltonians are just formalism which works for pendulums, but I am a very pure mathematician, user.

How do you know that?

Next year I will, Satan

You're no mathematician

The correct answer is over 9000 you newfag

Why do harmonisc in a Fourier Series (given we analize a sinusiodal signal) have their frequency multiple of the fundamental harmonic?

Will you be a mathematician?

8

Alma mater studiorum?

whats 2+2 ?

Yes is does .99999999~ is the answer
>and u say you can math

wouldn't that be 9, because after that you start over again with 0 ?

Because the system { exp(inx) }_{n \in N} is a complete system in L^2, so it works.

How does string theory make use of the idea that
1+2+3+4+... = - 1/12 ???

How does string theory make use of the monster set?

Oh this one's clever.

Yes, it is correct that all mathematicians are actually computers nowadays

Nope. Im trying to run away from math as fast as I can. I'm simply not intrested in maths. I like physics, programming, everything that "has to do with math" but I don't like mathematics.

Pisa

Are you a fag?

1 in < G₃, + >

Can there exist a point in the plane at rational distance from all four vertices of the unit square? why or why not?

>no but high school starts in September better start studying

It's called the monster group.

Look up normalization for dealing with weird expressions in physics.

String theory is just nonsense, user. However I think the idea is to use renormalization (another faggot stuff). I know nothing about the use of the monster group.

Kek

is zero real?

renormalization is not faggot stuff, string theory isn't nonsense you frauds

If you can be a good programmer/any field that has to do with physics (that would include engineering), without good knowledge of maths, please hit me up. Imna give you a car or something.
I tell you, you won't be able to do a thing without maths.
Maybe sweep the floor in a programming company.

No. It's just abstraction, like every number greater than 100 000

Devo passare l'esame di Matematica Discreta all'uni.
Come faccio?

Have you a proof of that, user?
I will answer for you.
>No

It's just a meme theory

it was a serious question you dumb fuck

Sei di Pisa?

Yes.

ℑ[0]=0

It's a serious answer, user. Not joking, think about it: God invented natural numbers, the rest is purely abstraction.
Can you really think a number greater than 100 000?

>Needs proof to be movitated
Oh I'm sorry I thought I wasn't speaking to another calculator

No, Torino. Studio Informatica.

Come si fa la matematica

Stop algebra faggorty, please

>Not an argument.
I meant an experimental proof.

hahahhahahhahaahahahahahahaahhaahahaha
this is the fucking greatest question i've ever seen in my life

You probably think FLT is algebra too.

Impara un fottio di combinatoria, in genere è sufficiente per fare gli esercizi di matematica discreta.

Con molta pazienza

>Mathematics needs experimental proof before investigating further

Okay enjoy verifying the past the rest of your life

The programming and physics we did in school didn't require all the bullshit we learned in math class. We only used the basic stuff like derivatives, integrals, matrices, etc in programming or physics. Am i going to use the Lagrange or Rolle theorem or some specialised bullshit like that at something?

No, but its proof is with algebra methods. You can't deny it.

Renormalization is critical in obtaining finite results from calculations in quantum electrodynamics, and QED is the most accurate theory in the history of science - for example, experiment has verified multi-loop calculations of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron to about one part in a billion.

...

No, nigger. Physics requires it