Formation only has 3 defenders

[Nicholas Butler]

>formation only has 3 defenders

[Levi Hill]

>he thinks formation matters

[Michael Mitchell]

>formation only has 1 striker

[Isaac Sanders]

>formation has two strikers

[Luis Mitchell]

>7-1

[Brandon Miller]

>It's an Italy episode

[Tyler Johnson]

BOO!

[Hudson Ortiz]

>only 3

Dumbfuck. A back of 3 is much more defensive than a back of 4.

This

[Isaiah Cruz]

A

[Jackson Diaz]

good post.

[Carter Sanders]

>his formation has 3 strikers

[Jose Long]

I run a 5 2 1 2 on fifa

Am i a meme

[Cameron Russell]

>His team doesnt play patrician 3-5-2

[Ian Jones]

PART

[Gavin Rodriguez]

TIME

[Brayden Sanders]

>he doesn't play 4-1-4-1

[Ethan Bell]

was gonna say yes but this has me on the fence:

forum.ea.com/uk/posts/list/2951510.page

[Jason Perry]

3-5-2 is the true GOAT

[Gabriel Green]

MANAGER

[John Jackson]

>FOUR

>FOUR

>FUCKING

>TWO

[Liam Young]

Unless of course your full backs can defend rather than being deep lying wingers which I know is a foreign concept to your lot

[Oliver Edwards]

Using actual defenders on a back 4 is idiotic. Rather have 3 CBs. The most important notion on that aspect is positioning, which can be learned more easily than tackling or marking. No use to have 4 '''real''' defenders.

e.g. see how Belgium is shit.

[Brandon Johnson]

By "that aspect" I mean "being a full back" if it isn't clear