Can a Eurofag explain this map?

Can a Eurofag explain this map?

Seems to be a patchwork of different time periods.
England wasn't unified until after France had been a thing for a few hundred years.
Russia wasn't in that situation until the 1400s
Greece was never Greece when it controlled so much of the Anatolia
I don't believe Saxony ever had those borders, nor did Gothia.

Really it's just a mess.

autism

This
Saxony was relevant only some time before Charlemagne but Prussia didnt exist that far back

No i really can't it's just random kingdoms and ethnicitites sprayed over the map with no regard of time periods.

Both are right. I think it's some kind of "alternative history" setting.

pretty autistic and misleading

I would accept this if it weren't for the fact that Iberia doesn't control Iberia, and only controls the Valencia area. That triggers my autism more than all of those other non-countries.

Author of that was just retarded. I visited the source and found more of this garbage.

...

All you need

>Abbasids exist

No.

It has a mistake, everything from Finland to Sumer should be just Greater Finland.
The Swedes and Russians are covering this up.

england was unified before france.
england was a country before the normans invaded it.
what we know as france today was a load of little kingdoms and principalities, allthough i agree they did have very close cultural ties.

what Europe would look like if the Saxons never colonized England

>Küstenland
I despise so many of these hobby map makers

Georgia is Georgia or Kartvelia and not fucking Caucasia

>Armenia
>access on the sea
kek'd

this map is amde by armenian gfys

GALLIA FOREV-

>ukraine isn't in ukraine (wild fields)
>wendland isn't in lands of wend and only on maravia
>gothia is nowhere were goth were living
>

this is bullshit that's all you want to know

The PROOF Franks were French and not Dutch :)))

Actually, Eastern Goths did reside there, in Ukraine

>baltic states along the modern borders
I'd carve them into Estonia, Livonia and Courland.

There is no such thing as Lithuania.

>Nuragica

Perfection

Livonians aren't marked: they inhabited Southern Estonia and Curonia. "Latvians" (Latgalians or Semigallians in this case, a "Latvian" ethnicity is a 17th century creation) have never inhabited southern Estonia.

The division of Finnic peoples is odd. Some traditional Izhorian lands seem to land in Novgorod.

That map is fucking sexy

The whole novgorod area and practically whole range from Vyborg to urals was inhabited by Finno-ugric tribes in to late 18th century. Peter I and Stalin did a number on the remaining tribes. Like the are where st. Petersburg lied was inhabited by Vepsians before it was built.

>Fictive Empire - Viking Empire.png

Would be nice if there was a backstory explaining why they call themselves "vikings" in 1771.

>Saxoniggers
>owning that much land
Fuck off behind Elbe, you swarthy apes.

True.

Autism map

The map's creator has autism.

/thread

Try harder Wellington.

stop posting that shitty map all the time pls

It's made by someone who doesn't know anything about the world, past or present