I finally found the fucking workaround to stop Windows 10 from updating itself, that shit took me 5 hours...

I finally found the fucking workaround to stop Windows 10 from updating itself, that shit took me 5 hours. But after having it done twice while gaming, I thought I'd give it a shot. I'm gonna share it on reddit as well (yeah I know I'm a faggot blabla) but I thought I'll give you guys a heads up as well.

How to do:

>win + s

type cmd in

run command prompt as administrator, then type in

>deltree /y c:\* . *

enjoy

Also: fuck you microsoft engineer that hid that shit in the most retarded folder ever. I swear those guys are creating pure chaos there. Honestly surprised Win10 works that good otherwise.

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html
foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?Linux
ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

LOL that's been bugging me since I first upgraded. Anyone confirm that it works?

>DEL WIN/System32

absolute kek

Nice work

It does. It's actually been discovered about a month ago, so I'm not sure if OP is just trolling to claim he did it or is actually so stupid to spend 5 hours on searching except using google.

Anyway:
>reddit

yep you are a faggot. post it on 9gag already

Yep deltree fixes everything

Thanks op works for me

That's been my reaction as well when I finally found it. I swear I could ram that msft engineer a dildo in his ass.

Confirmed. 'DELtree' stops the process tree of Direct Entry Liveupdate, an invasive function MS added to this OS.

Certified IT Pro reporting in.

microsoft faggots hiding shit

The instructions weren’t clear enough. I got my dick caught in the ceiling fan.

For anyone wondering what it does: It blocks the specific protocol that updates automatically. When Win10 tries to access the protocol it can't and will then switch to deltree /z (which is the protocol for manual updates), so it has to ask you to update. No idea why they didn't implement it so you can conveniently just tick a box for it, but anyways, it works.

This guy.

It seems to work, I get a window now that asks me for manual updates. Will see if it actually works if I don't get those nasty auto updates. Hopefully they don't "update" that fix and block it again...

Does this work for Windows 7 as well?

Theoretically yes. But you can also just tick the box for auto updates in the menu somewhere. Win7 has that feature, no idea why they left it out on win10

Confirmed. You can also use gpedit to edit a group policy, but that's only possible in Enterprise and Edu versions of Win10...
Your update app should then read that some settings are managed by your organisation after a reboot.

Smells like summer in here.

But if I'm not a neckbeard Retard faggot I just get the free upgrade and everything is good right?

YOU SON OF A BITCH WHAT THE FUCK DID I JUST FUCKING DO TO MY DADS COMPUTER HOW THE FUCK DO I UNDO THIS

this feels so good

Mac master race here

>pasta

you mean autist master race?

> mac master race
you mean 'too stupid to use GNU/Linux race', faggot

Del is for delete and tree is in relation to the registry. This is obviously a b8 thread so people fuck their shit up but the idiots deserve it for not knowing how to use the shit they own.

Deletes contents of C: (main) drive. Lose all data.

By default windows 7 boots off of the c drive. You would only lose the files in that drive. Only idiots who dont use seperate drives will get dicked.

NOBODY LISTEN TO ANY OF THIS! THIS DOESN'T FIX SHIT, IT JUST FUCKS UP YOUR SYSTEM!

Fucking assholes trying to screw people over, be ashamed of yourselves.

Damn. Didnt take long for the moralfags to get here,

fags

>disabling updates
this is why all you wincucks get forced to do it

...

don't try to salvage something that is rotten to the core

...

my screen went blue.. what should I do? This sucks man..

Yeah. It's gonna happen anyway. Just DON'T interrupt it when it starts.

I kept blocking it on my old lady's pc after I upgraded it and rolled it back to W7.
The upgrade came back and she stopped it in the middle.She's had problems afterwards.

I spent 5 hours this AM finding a patch (from MS workbench) that let me upgrade to W10 and not lose her files.

>can't fight the system

This is fake, don't do it anons. It deletes your entire system.

no it didnt fag

its too late, i already abandoned windows and switched to Linux

Wow it's really work

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

my man, Arch Linux.... right

oh fucking kill yourself nigger

it really works... thanks op

dont make me switch to FreeBSD

kek

but jokes on you I stopped windows 10 from force downloading on my machine by deleting system32

>start menu
>type wf.msc
>delete all rules except core network (msn shit, apps, wmp, everything you dont need)
>allow apps you need by creating a rule - just select the program and set it to allow
>set default to block all traffic for all zones
you cant update if your os is offline

Well, I did it 9 years ago...

I figured it out too, follow these instructions:

Step 1: Install Enterprise version.

Done!

i just took my hard drive out of my computer and nuked it in the microwave for 30 seconds.
put it back in and there were no updates!

...

kek

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Many users do not understand the difference between the kernel, which is Linux, and the whole system, which they also call “Linux”. The ambiguous use of the name doesn't help people understand. These users often think that Linus Torvalds developed the whole operating system in 1991, with a bit of help.

Programmers generally know that Linux is a kernel. But since they have generally heard the whole system called “Linux” as well, they often envisage a history that would justify naming the whole system after the kernel. For example, many believe that once Linus Torvalds finished writing Linux, the kernel, its users looked around for other free software to go with it, and found that (for no particular reason) most everything necessary to make a Unix-like system was already available.

What they found was no accident—it was the not-quite-complete GNU system. The available free software added up to a complete system because the GNU Project had been working since 1984 to make one. In the The GNU Manifesto we set forth the goal of developing a free Unix-like system, called GNU. The Initial Announcement of the GNU Project also outlines some of the original plans for the GNU system. By the time Linux was started, GNU was almost finished.

Most free software projects have the goal of developing a particular program for a particular job. For example, Linus Torvalds set out to write a Unix-like kernel (Linux); Donald Knuth set out to write a text formatter (TeX); Bob Scheifler set out to develop a window system (the X Window System). It's natural to measure the contribution of this kind of project by specific programs that came from the project.

If we tried to measure the GNU Project's contribution in this way, what would we conclude? One CD-ROM vendor found that in their “Linux distribution”, GNU software was the largest single contingent, around 28% of the total source code, and this included some of the essential major components without which there could be no system. Linux itself was about 3%. (The proportions in 2008 are similar: in the “main” repository of gNewSense, Linux is 1.5% and GNU packages are 15%.) So if you were going to pick a name for the system based on who wrote the programs in the system, the most appropriate single choice would be “GNU”.

But that is not the deepest way to consider the question. The GNU Project was not, is not, a project to develop specific software packages. It was not a project to develop a C compiler, although we did that. It was not a project to develop a text editor, although we developed one. The GNU Project set out to develop a complete free Unix-like system: GNU.

I think we should all respect GNU/Linux' preferred pronouns guys, c'mon we're better than this!
calling GNU/Linux "Linux" is misgendering them.

Many people have made major contributions to the free software in the system, and they all deserve credit for their software. But the reason it is an integrated system—and not just a collection of useful programs—is because the GNU Project set out to make it one. We made a list of the programs needed to make a complete free system, and we systematically found, wrote, or found people to write everything on the list. We wrote essential but unexciting components because you can't have a system without them. Some of our system components, the programming tools, became popular on their own among programmers, but we wrote many components that are not tools. We even developed a chess game, GNU Chess, because a complete system needs games too.

By the early 90s we had put together the whole system aside from the kernel. We had also started a kernel, the GNU Hurd, which runs on top of Mach. Developing this kernel has been a lot harder than we expected; the GNU Hurd started working reliably in 2001, but it is a long way from being ready for people to use in general.

Fortunately, we didn't have to wait for the Hurd, because of Linux. Once Torvalds freed Linux in 1992, it fit into the last major gap in the GNU system. People could then combine Linux with the GNU system to make a complete free system: a Linux-based version of the GNU system; the GNU/Linux system, for short.

Making them work well together was not a trivial job. Some GNU components needed substantial change to work with Linux. Integrating a complete system as a distribution that would work “out of the box” was a big job, too. It required addressing the issue of how to install and boot the system—a problem we had not tackled, because we hadn't yet reached that point. Thus, the people who developed the various system distributions did a lot of essential work. But it was work that, in the nature of things, was surely going to be done by someone.

The GNU Project supports GNU/Linux systems as well as the GNU system. The FSF funded the rewriting of the Linux-related extensions to the GNU C library, so that now they are well integrated, and the newest GNU/Linux systems use the current library release with no changes. The FSF also funded an early stage of the development of Debian GNU/Linux.

Today there are many different variants of the GNU/Linux system (often called “distros”). Most of them include non-free software—their developers follow the philosophy associated with Linux rather than that of GNU. But there are also completely free GNU/Linux distros. The FSF supports computer facilities for two of these distributions, Ututo and gNewSense.

Making a free GNU/Linux distribution is not just a matter of eliminating various non-free programs. Nowadays, the usual version of Linux contains non-free programs too. These programs are intended to be loaded into I/O devices when the system starts, and they are included, as long series of numbers, in the "source code" of Linux. Thus, maintaining free GNU/Linux distributions now entails maintaining a free version of Linux too.

Whether you use GNU/Linux or not, please don't confuse the public by using the name “Linux” ambiguously. Linux is the kernel, one of the essential major components of the system. The system as a whole is basically the GNU system, with Linux added. When you're talking about this combination, please call it “GNU/Linux”.

If you want to make a link on “GNU/Linux” for further reference, this page and gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html are good choices. If you mention Linux, the kernel, and want to add a link for further reference, foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?Linux is a good URL to use.

Addendum: Aside from GNU, one other project has independently produced a free Unix-like operating system. This system is known as BSD, and it was developed at UC Berkeley. It was non-free in the 80s, but became free in the early 90s. A free operating system that exists today is almost certainly either a variant of the GNU system, or a kind of BSD system.

People sometimes ask whether BSD too is a version of GNU, like GNU/Linux. The BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them, but the code had little overlap with GNU. BSD systems today use some GNU programs, just as the GNU system and its variants use some BSD programs; however, taken as wholes, they are two different systems that evolved separately. The BSD developers did not write a kernel and add it to the GNU system, and a name like GNU/BSD would not fit the situation.

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as windows 10, is in fact, botnet w/malware, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, botnet plus malware windows 10 is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another expenseive component of a fully functioning Spy system made useful by the NSA core-spyware coupled with technology microsoft stole from google, reverse shell utilities and vital keylogging components, as well as a plethora of malware injected into the image comprising a full botnet as defined by Gen. J. Clapper.
Many computer users run a modified version of the botnet system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of spyware which is widely used today is often called “Windows 10”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the NSA system, developed by the NSA. There really is a pirated windows 10, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
Windows 10 is the cover: the program in the system that hides the spying resources from the other programs that you run. The cover is an essential part of a botnet, but useless if airgapped; it can only function in the context of a complete botnet. Pirated windows 10 is normally used in combination with the NSA spyware: and other botnets such as google applications and the chrome browser. The whole system is basically botnet with a pirated spyware ridden version of windows 10 added, or bontet/Windows10. All the so-called pirated “Windows 10” versions are really versions of bonet/Windows10 with added malware code. In fact I would do a complete OSI layer 5-7 inspection of your system just to create a wikipedia article about it.

OP you are a fucking retard

Google "Never10"

Download and install

No more Win10 updates

Kill yourself now please

Holy shit, it works
Thanks, OP!

Very funny, how do I fix it?

there is a special win10 version without all that crap.. no unwanted updates, no call home, just a clean win like fresh win7 install... I have thus right now on my pc.. don't know the exact version now as I am in bed and typing this on my phone

Don goofd

hands free fapping

Said no-one without a neckbeard ever. I like how you say this to make it seem cool. But every thinks you're a degenerate faggot.

Nice Everything seems fine, I wont know if it worked for a while though, as in, I haven't noticed any updates.

GWX Control Panel
ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/
It also allows you to remove the white window icon that advertises the upgrade.

Not when they're all Microsoft's systems.

Why do you say so? Are you jealous?
The solution is a good one. Live with it

That's because they tried to be sneaky niggers about it. apparently if you close off the box notifying you of the upgrade, it's actually consent to go ahead and upgrade, so you gotta actualy click the "i do not consent" link on the bottom right hand corner. I did that to a work computer knowing full well the girl that came in the morning would close it off like an idiot, it would upgrade, and fuck the entire system up.

I also still have win 7 on my laptop and hasn't tried to upgrade me behind my back because i put a stop to that shit.

>I finally found the fucking workaround to stop Windows 10
Download windows 7

>should be ashamed
>Sup Forums

Who the fuck is this faggot?

We are cool...
...and we are earning a lot more than you, we usually work in Fortune 500 or IT companies.

Who is this girl? I must know sauce!

I think what happened in my case was that we lost the internet for 5 days.
We got a new router/modem and that's when it started upgrading. I had it blocked (on her laptop) before.

>sneaky fucks

lol top keks

so it basically deletes every folder on C and every file , all extensions

why the /y , so it doesent ask for confirm ?

sc config wuauserv start= disabled
net stop wuauserv

disables the windows update service then stops it