Name one conservative policy in the last 36 years that has positively affected society or the world as it is today and...

Name one conservative policy in the last 36 years that has positively affected society or the world as it is today and explain your reasoning.

Other urls found in this thread:

eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>gay bashing
a fun, family-friendly entertainment

muslims do that too, in the middle east they execute the gays, republicans and the theocratic rulers on the middle east have so much in common

Only women and fags will vote for Hillary...no men will vote for that cunt

Don't post this on Sup Forums, you'll trigger all the alt right middle schoolers

I don't recall feminists and transgenders and Black Lives Matter on the Enterprise or the Federation or the Romulan Empire or the Klingon Empire or the Borg Collective or the Dominion.

>Constitutional Carry. Everybody that can legally own a gun is allowed to carry in public

Result, lower violent crime rates and safer city

considering that she is actually a moderate republican running as a democrat you are correct

You know that great economy Slick Willy gets credited for. You can thank Reaganomics for that. Best damn economic growth ever, but Bill takes all the credit for.

That's funny ..trump wants to kill all muslims or mudslimes and hillary loves them and hillary loves the saudi bastards also ...

So why don't liberals worship conservatives in the same way they worship mudslimes?

well, not everything about islam is bad.everything has good ad bad aspects

lol I was right, triggered righties showing up right on cue

>Trump wants to kill all

Stopped reading right there. Don't care what way you lean. Making statements like that is uneducated and part of the group think.

which city? Atlantis?

Because they're hypocrites. They hate religion, but love Muslims only because conservative/Christians generally dislike them.

...

Lower taxes. It makes sense for people to retain the wealth they created.

>implying hillary isn't actually a conservative
the bushes and most republicans also love the saudis due to their ties in war and fossil fuels and their social conservative values

Yeah, it's pretty cool how wives in Afghanistan can't speak unless spoken to, walk behind their husbands, can't drive cars, aren't allowed to have jobs. Keeps women from fucking up.

They all read the same crazy book ..they all hate Americans ...muslims,Islams,Arabs are scum of the earth and nobody likes em

A liberal future is a future where everyone is mixed

>I don't recall feminists and transgenders and Black Lives Matter on the Enterprise
that's because on star trek they had greatly advanced medicine and were able to cure mental illnesses that plague us today.

First, name one liberal policy that's not going to fuck the next 36 years.

post source you folthy kuffar

sorry, but that's just a load of shit. what is commonly referred to as reaganomics, and what bush 1 called voodoo economics, is the trickle down. and while reagan wanted spoke about it, even he wasn't dumb enough to actually go all in. enter bush 2. the result of real reagonomics was the largest economic recession since the fucking great depression.

Fuck off

Where are the gays in star trek?

Yeah, I certainly feel much safer when some clearly emotionally unstable fag walking around with his gun.

Not letting women vote. Every society that lets women vote went downhill since then.

trickle down failed miserably, it gave our economy cancer as all the wealth pools up few in places like a growing tumor

...

Personally I think it's because they have a lot in common with the mudslimes. They both want to destroy established western culture. They appeal to poor and stupid people who want everything handed to them based on their ethnicity. And all their work is done by inferior races that are bent to their will.

anyone who believes that they need someone to rule over and protect them is a cuck.

i.e. everyone ever. no hope here.

Do your own homework, Steven.

fuck the "liberal" or "conservative" argument. its a complete waste of time. people should be more focused on "right or wrong" and "does/would it work or not?"

Maybe. I could never get a straight answer out of one. Even my liberal friends have no idea why liberals in the media love Muslims so much.

>25 years of economic growth
>greatest hits since the recession

10/10

Reagan, like other presidents, didn't Internet with the economy during the recession he inherited (fun fact worse than the 2009 one), did nothing and it took off like a fucking rocket. Obama puts his dick in and in fact hurts and slows the recovery. But yeah Reaganomics was horrible. Get your rose colored glasses off.

Protip: we can't

Legal gun ownership has been around forever, however violent crime rates actually lowered as a direct result of legalizing abortion.

The rest of the first world has fewer guns and also a lower violent crime rate. So although its possible that legal gun carrying is reducing violent crimes, there is no evidence to support this

anytime someone tells you theirs only two options to any problem, its a scam.

Fiscal restraint.

But people aren't that smart. They'd rather have a list of ideals they should adhere to. That's why people like party politics so much, they get told what to do and think, so they have no responsibility.

unless if a country has oil and we decide to invade

Low taxes, increased liberty, secure borders, bill of rights,

What if we abort babies WITH guns?

>increased liberty
the patriot act and the war on drugs

Citizens United

Because what are Corporations if not groups of people acting with sovereignty

fixed

white people wont exist in a liberal future

you mean legal bribery?

Except that isn't how that works. Do you guys think the US just steals all of the oil, puts it on a boat, and ships it back to the US? The US is still buying their oil, which is mostly privately owned. The war didn't change that, and it didn't give the US a better price.

But this is only true in some states

This. Liberals have fucked us up with their narcissistic dreams of "muh equality" and all this shit.

FYI This whole internet thing you're on is a result of Regan's privatization of government services. The reason Bill Clinton had such a good economy is because it takes a few years to build that stuff out and develop infrastructure and applications.
Regan didn't know the internet would be a big deal. He just knew that if you let people participate and innovate good things will happen.

The death penalty was brought upon Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden

The privatization and monetization of higher education leads to fierce competition and an increase in the general quality of graduates, meaning more intelligent populace and greater economic output

Conservatives support the use of coal and natural gas as energy sources. eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3 Over two thirds of our electricity come from coal and natural gas. If the liberals had their way we'd be living in the 1800's again

The stance against illegal immigration reduces the tax burden on working Americans and increases the quality of life for citizens. Illegal immigration currently costs the US $113 billion per year. The majority of that (close to 97%) is spent feeding and housing them in government housing and cleaning up crimes committed by illegal immigrants. A very VERY small portion is spent trying to keep them out of our country.

A lot of that makes sense, but I'm just going to call you racist while continuing to believe that if we stopped burning coal, we'd still have enough energy to play our vidya games.

I respect your right to an opinion, disagree with yours, and won't pursue an argument with someone if I don't see any way to sway you.

Now I'm off to slap my 1950's house wife, shoot a nigger, yell at queers (God hates them so much), and tell some wetbacks to give us back our jobs.

The fact that conservatives only tell you what you CAN'T do and that liberals only give you a list of what you CAN do should prove easily enough who values freedom more.
Negative Rights (conservative) > Positive Rights (liberal).

Both are negative rights.
You're not allowed to be suspicious and act like a terrorist, and you're not allowed to be a degenerate piece of shit and do/sell drugs.
And there's nothing wrong with banning either considering the time's risky situation.

The declining poverty rate is usually linked with abortion, the bans on lead paint and leaded gasoline are believed to be the source of lowered crime.

Invent technology entirely under the hand of government overwatchers with government money. Privitize it just in time to capitalize on the roll out, now that the R&D was good to go.

> hurr durr private industry did it all!

The Space program? A nazi was the lead you nigger coco sucking fagget liberals are only useful for sending in front of the real men in war for canon fodder.

Lower taxes lets folks save money and put more into the economy, creating more wealth for everyone

an in what way this contradicts what I said in the post you are referring?

true, nobody likes them. same with dumbericans. nobody likes them either

There was an armed guard at Columbine...

Wesley Crusher was obviously gay.

Limiting the number of years a single mother could receive welfare. Not paying more money for more children.

he was also a furry, if you recall that one episode

You know... there's a line there in the middle somewhere between the two. Just not very popular being moderate these days.

Yeah, because THAT has been such a benchmark achievement in policy and has helped SO many people.

You can see the future? Tell me, when do i finally die?

The US constitution the bill of rights and the declaration of independence

is that a bad thing? lol

Don't be a sap. There is no "moderate" only weasel. Take a stand! Be a man, not a transgender asshole who can't understand what his dick is there for.

Yeah, mixing races won't solve problems. In fact, it doesn't do shit.

Take look at the birth rates for single black women. It has indeed helped a lot, a lot fewer kids are being born into poverty. Less money is being spent taking care of unwanted children.

That's a win unless you hate kids, your call darling.

Yeah, because then you get shit on by both sides. Like guns? Too right for the left. Think gays should be able to fuck each other? Too left for the right.

Moderates are just conservatives who are more afraid to be called racist in public.

The wrecking of communism

exactly so it's not bad or good

Yeah, it's pointless (And racist) to worry so much about skin color.

Trips of truth

Feminism is the Borg collective

I disagree. I don't hide my racism. I think almost everyone is at least, a little racist. But that doesn't mean I don't think blacks (or whatever race) deserve the same rights as me.

None of that sounds like it helped anyone ever. It sounds like a LOSE unless you hate kids. Or just unless you hate black people and think it might hurt them. Pretty much same as any other conservative.

the apes had a pretty good society going though

no one cares about how you feel. policies are put into place based on facts. if they haven't banned guns or open carry, then its because they know it doesn't cause more gun crime

You mean the real estate bubble, or the steadily widening gulf between rich and poor? Whether you blame Republicans or right wing Democrats like Clinton, the only prosperity we've seen since 1980 has been in the form of speculation bubbles that have all since burst. The mindset of compulsive greed for short-term gains at any cost has destroyed any hope for a better future unless something major changes, and thanks to Citizens United and unchecked gerrymandering, it's incredibly unlikely that it will.

“Prosperity, however, has not come to all societies. Material consumption in some countries, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa, is now well below the preindustrial norm. …These African societies have remained trapped in the Malthusian era, where technological advances merely produce more people and living standards are driven down to subsistence. …Just as the Industrial Revolution reduced income inequalities within societies, it has increased them between societies, in a process recently labeled the Great Divergence.” A Farewell to Alms, Introduction (2008), Gregory Clark

You dumbfuck, it's because the NRA is paying off the fucking conservatives. And it's FUCKING PROVEN. So you're a dumbass for that post.

It discourages having kids you can't afford, forcing them into a shitty life. Are you autism or just having a laugh?

Your prediction is wrong. The niggers will never be in charge.

Found the bernout

How edgy. No Americans care when you say this shit. Your country probably spews anti American propaganda like most to make you think it doesn't actually suck as bad as it does

The final solution

>Implying conservative = iliberal
>Implying liberal = leftie
>being this retarded

What do you think communism is?

It's iliberal leftism.

What do you think free trade is?

It's liberal rightism.

Get a fucking education.

I extend Muslims the same level of tolerance I give to Christians. I don't let either group get away with anything I wouldn't tolerate from an atheist, but I leave them alone otherwise.

Expecting all Muslims to be violent zealots just because the Quran says to would be like expecting all Christians to give away their possessions, happily pay their taxes, and practise radical nonviolence just because the Gospels tell them to. The vast majority of religious people just live their life like they would if they were atheists, and pick and choose the bits of scripture that justify it, whilst ignoring the bits that don't.

How's Chicago going for you?

>low quality bait

Most conservatives want the same thing. Racists, racialists, and nationalists keep voting Republican, and the people they vote for keep pushing for the same "diversity" rubbish as Democrats.

You have a very simplistic way of thinking. Less people have "welfare babies" than you are implying and single mothers, both white and black and all other ethnicities, have a tough enough time. Also, it's conservative policies that restrict women's access to birth control and abortions, FORCING women often enough to have babies they can't afford.