Did he actually want to win?

Did he actually want to win?

Because

A) Now that he has reached the only political goal he stands for why would he still be relevant?

B) If the Brexit goes wrong and has overall negative consequences he'll be blamed for it forever.

You have autism.

...

I think he genuinely wanted the UK to leave, but hasn't thought of the consequences.

There's a lot of xeonfobic people in Britain, or at least in England, to support his political career indefinitely and if something goes wrong, he'll just do what he has always done -- blame the EU and Germany. It doesn't really matter whether they are part of EU or not to blame them for all the woes.

For example, US has not special trade/free movement agreement with Mexico, or at least nowhere near the extent that is in EU/UK relations, yet people completely eat up whatever that leaks out of Trump's mouth hole about Mexicans and how they ruin everything for everyone and ask for seconds.

There sure might be hardcore fans but there will also be a lot of people who supported him but arent blind followers. When he cant deliver what he promised theyll be pissed.

Yeah, those people will turn to Boris "350M a week for NHS" Johnson.

Huge change.

Isnt he currently nowhere to be found?

>When he cant deliver what he promised theyll be pissed.
There was a lot of complaints about David Cameron not delivering on his promises as well...
At the end of the day, politicians are never to be trusted anyway.

brexit is the stupidest fucking shit brits have ever done

You really think it's xenophobic when UK is seemingly getting ravaged?

Ha, I haven't noticed that. Probably too busy wanking it to big picture of the number 52.

But people, for some obscure reason, keep claiming that he's going to be the next PM. Pigfucker succeeded by a windbag. The negotiations with EU will be fun, fun, fun.

He called a lot of politicians incompetent because they booed him when he said that this should be handled like adults.
He said they have never had a real job in trade and shit like that because they were acting like children. Fucking hilarious

That's really not what's happening. The immigration issue is overblown way out of proportion. If anything, the most problematic immigrants are the Pakis, which have nothing to do with the EU.

Just look up the term Londonistan.

It's the best thing that could've happened in our lifetime. Another generation and they wouldn't have been able to leave, fucking millennials. I can't wait for the EU to crash and burn.

The EU cannot burn.

...

>overblown way out of proportion
>implying the housing crisis is blown out of proportion
You literally can't cope with it without controlling the borders and having the population growth under control

Do you seriously thing Polish immigrants are causing the housings crisis?

Useless people incompetent at developing their cities, like The Boris, are who's causing the housing crisis.

You're right. Brexit was a bad idea, immigration isn't actually a problem. UK should just continue to take in hundreds of thousands of people every year, hopefully not everyone will need housing.

Yes, it most certainly can, and it kind of is.
What do you think is going to happen once Greece and Italy need further bailing out.

Besides, are sovereign, independent countries simply incapable of trading together without having to be a part of The Great European Costco?

>requires membership
>look at all these things you can buy and for so cheap!
>really aren't getting that great of a deal when you really stop and do the math

...

You are over simplifying.

In order to trade, e.g. goods, you have to have matching regulations. These regulations need to designed, treaties signed and laws passed. It's literally impossible to have an arrangement like European Economic Area (the single market), at this scope, without some international regulatory body.

It would be simply hellishly complicated and bureaucracy would much worse.

You could say
>But, but Norway!
Norway, who has to pay the same amount of money as the UK, has to accept the free movement -- which is tied deeply into the treat that establishes EEA -- and gest no say in what regulations are passed and what they contain.

People keep thinking that "oh, we'll just trade". Just look at the bottom of your fucking kettle. See all that regulatory information, what standards it passes and so on? The EU ones is called CE. If it weren't for EU regulations, every country could have their own, and the kettle would have to pass all those certifications. That would be truly wonderful for business.

>implying it's just polish immigrants
Because the free movement policy imposed by the EU only applies to pollacks.

It only applies to EU citizens. I presume that you are mostly worried about the poorer Central European countries, for which Poland is a good approximation.

I really doubt that Germans or the French are terribly anxious to immigrate to the UK.

And no one want to talk to the ugly guys losers that get rejected by the popular people but they still bother popular people or anybody in public n there ugly n smell like shit like beyonce n that's why get rejected by both genders

Oh don't worry. UK population will be soon cut by about 5 million. Sure, you'll lose some land too, and won't really be "United" any longer, but you'll get your dream of fewer people in your country!

Scotland can't leave, it's not country.

>In order to trade, e.g. goods, you have to have matching regulations. These regulations need to designed, treaties signed and laws passed.
There are few things lawyers-turned-career-politicans love more than red tape.
It doesn't have to be that hard, but it means more time spent mulling over infinitesimally small.

Also, European trade didn't start back in the 70's. The reason for it was to cut tariffs, but surely in [THE CURRENT YEAR] the countries can't all just work something out? Or are European nations incapable of peacefully working out deals with each other without it starting a world war?

And even at that, is it not possible to have a higher body trading between the countries that DOESN'T take away their sovereignty and force in the free movement of people upon them? But hey, only in the EU....

The basic idea of the EU is a good one, but it's become something quite nasty.

>Norway, who has to pay the same amount of money as the UK, has to accept the free movement
That sounds a lot like fascism. Either pay the "protection fee" and accept these people who don't speak your language and don't want to intigrate with you or we will drive your nation into the ground with sanctions?

Sounds like a wonderful little group! Here's my blood, where do I sign up?

Are you talking about Scotland? Good. Please vote for your independence so you can have the "FREEDOM" to join the EU and have all your decisions made for you in Brussels. The funny thing is that by the time you fully integrate with them and switch over to the Euro (a requirement of all EU member states by 2020), at least one or two other countries will probably leave the EU and you'll have to help with the bailouts of the failing member states. And when the EU inevitable crashes down, so will you.

Maybe we will let you back into the UK if you plead enough. :^)

Whoops!

>... more time spent mulling over infinitesimally small *contractual details for exorbitant salaries.

The EU has never been about people like you or me ... and especially not now!

you might not know it, but you do.

>Did he actually want to win

Yes, but he wanted to negotiate with the EU, that isn't being allowed to happen though. The conservatives have completely shut him out.

>A) Now that he has reached the only political goal he stands for why would he still be relevant?

If the conservatives actually do what the public want & do not accept free movement of people, then UKIP will change it's main goal to reducing immigration.

If, like I suspect, the conservatives betray the British people, accept free movement of people, he'll run for the next general election of the basis of completely shutting that down. And he'll have a decent chance of winning too because when the Tories give a big fuck you to the public, they'll lose a lot of support, support which won't touch the Labour party who despise the white working classes, they'll only trust Nigel to close up shop. He's the only person who's serious about immigration.

>B) If the Brexit goes wrong and has overall negative consequences he'll be blamed for it forever.

By the left, probably, who look to slander him at every turn. Many people however will simply blame the conservatives when they betray the out voters by not reducing immigration.

This is the #1 concern in Britain, immigration, that concern will only grow.

1 single death at the hands of Islam is too much. Their religion tells them to kill, they kill. We try to stop that happening and get called xenophobic and racist. Herp the derp derp

One word:
Rotherham.

And here are two more: Eat dicks.

...