So wtf does it mean for England now that they're not a part of the EU?

So wtf does it mean for England now that they're not a part of the EU?
Stricter immigration policies? Economic disadvantages?

I haven't been following this shit. Enlighten me Sup Forums

Fucked

Probably both or neither

They wont exit eu anytime soon, if ever. process could take 2 years+, prob re-vote

Well, they still have to go through the process to leave the EU. Which could take up to 2 years.

They can now orchestrate their own trade deals which is a nice change of pace for their buisnesses. They basically get economic independence to an extent without anotice unelected body making decisions for them.

Immigration won't change much because the UK was already exempt from the refugee relocation.

Their dollar has fallen in value which was expected. The markets are crashing but will stablize. The GDP is expected to to fall by 1-3 percent, and standard of living is expected to be lowered. Other more minor things are also likely to happen, but won't affect anyone other than europeans.

It means the EU will do everything it can to spite England, and to make it look to the rest of the world that it's England's fault.

They're working toward a "new world order", under a single world government.. so they're not happy with England, and the last thing they're going to do is allow England to prosper.

They want people to see GOV = GOD. In other words, they want people the world over to be idiot liberals with irrational fears. To be triggered constantly by micro-aggressions and pray to the government for help.

One. Giant. Kindergarten. Plantation.

Extending on the immigration here. They can make legal immigration harder for foreign nationals, but this won't affect the refugee situation.

does our mate Kevin really deserve his freedom of choice though? I saw him lay down on the floor once, what a fkn nutter

Its good for Britain because they have finally voted for independence. They are choosing that people will have control rather than un elected officials. Young kids r now mad that they have robbed their future however the old people voted to get in the euro and they see how bad it actually was for thier country. So now older and wiser they know best thing for the country is to leave.

P.s OP is a fag

cameron said, no second vote. Also, little england (as great britain is gonna be outdated as soon as scotland leaves the union) is being pressured to leave as quick as possible.

Pending economic disadvantages, imported products might get more expensive, travel between f.e. the netherlands and LE will still be possible, but it's probably gonna have to be england providing border patrols on their own soil, instead of on the netherlands'.

Honestly it's mostly guessing yet, the only thing that's for sure is that england is hurting its own economy and that the big banks in london will probably move

tl;dr shit's gonna be more expensive

you do realise that the EU has an election system? multiple actually?

It means England is screwed. UK might break up. (Scotland wants to split, but migh not since Spain will veto their entry into EU solo; and Northern Ireland less likely to split, but might cause they can just unify with Ireland and be in EU automatically - both voted to remain). It means England will likely lose large portions of their banking industry, they are the clearing house for all major currencies, but EU likely to deny them authority to clear Euro out of spite, so they will lose billions a year. It means they lose access to the single Euro (free trade of all goods); or alternatively, they might get to stay in single market, but only if they agree to EU's immigration policies (so this would have all been for naught. I expect to see Nigel and Boris hanging from a rope in a back alley in the coming months/years.

But the actual decision making people at the top in Brussels are unelcted.

>eans they lose access to the single Euro (free trade of all goods)
Meant to say "lose access to the single market"

electing people is overrated

>EU commision who have the sole power to propose legislation
>electable

what top do you mean? do you mean donald tusk-top, mark rutte-top? do you mean the counsil of ministers?

People like you are scary stupid.

> they shouldn't fight. they should just bend over and take it up the ass. milk will be cheaper that way.

Fuck that shit. The whole reason the West is responsible for everything great in this world is because that's the opposite of what the West does. The rest of the EU nations should wake up as well.

It's never a bad decision to stand up right, to hold your head high, to make your own laws, to govern your own laws, to fucking establish and enforce, with any means necessary, your independence.

The whole problem with the West, with the white race.. is that they've forgotten that.

Well, we thought we had...

A coward dies a thousand deaths.

eu commission can propose laws on its own indeed, but these laws are only accepted if the elected part of the EU votes for the law to be accepted. Otherwise it'll get rejected

Its good for them in my opinion. They'll experience delays and economic short coming for about 2-4 years while trade agreements and immigration policies change but in the long run it will stabilize the pound reducing inflation on it and promote internal revenue. That's just my opinion though.

>UK might break up
>implying Scotland can split and the remainbabies aren't just memeing
It also means that if they don't want to, they don't have to listen to what laws any country wants
literally anti-democratic

Somehown that philosophy has never worked out. Elected people are the representation of the will of the majority. Unelected people are far more prone to power trips because they don't need to fear repercussions for their decisions. Elected people are more conscious of what the voters think, and therefore are more likely to make decisions that would help their voters out.

I am curious.I am not european, nor English, so I have no dog in this fight. But I ded read several article's stating that a majority of British people were not even sure what exiting the EU meant. Besides the immigration policy (which btw, it seems now that England is likely not to change since it is the only way they will have any access to the single market) what exactly were you upset about that that EU did? I keep hearing about freedom, which is an undefined concept, (and what I mean by that is that you can be free to choose your schools, what you buy, etc., or you can be free of all laws but subject to the tyranny of anarchist gangs, and virtually every agrees that absolute freedom is a failed concept, so you're talking about degrees and everyone has a different degree they would choose); and "taking back your country", but I have never heard a clear delineation of what laws you were forced to follow, or what specific laws England was subject to without voice that affected the citizens directly? I'm not being snide or baiting, I genuinely would like to know. (again, I've heard the immigration thing, but thats all I've heard, and many of the others mentioned, the 350 million pound dues, every single leave politician has admitted was a lie, or , I'm sorry, as Nigel put it "a mistake"

read again, the elected part has to have a majority of votes agreeing with the law before it's legislated

'what is the EU' was on the top-searched of google in england, just hours after the result of the referendum

I didn't imply anything. I stated facts. If part of your kingdom leaves, your kingdom is breaking up, you fucking nimrod. That's what breaking up is. Also, Northern Ireland may decide to leave as well. Leaving england and a couple thousand sheep herders in fucking wales. That's a country and its tiny pal, not a kingdom.

The European parliament is free to amend (i.e. totally rewrite) anything. In practice, the commission has no actual power, their proposals are just starting points for discussion.

There's nothing undemocratic about the EU. Some aspects of it are too centralized, while others are too decentralized. It's a mess in that respect.

>young remain voters(36% turnout 18-24) googling to find out what they've voted for
>surprising

Wow - I have never seen such an incredible amount of bullshit crammed into so few words

It's a fucking useless fact when the possibility of Scotland leaving is non-existent. Same goes for Northern Ireland.

Wow, this guy's an idiot. He's either baiting, trying to get someone riled up, or he voted for leave, and is angry 'cause he got played like a child - kek

It sounds like you DO have a dog in this fight. Far too much information for a neutral

He raises a perfectly valid point. Perhaps it is you who is hard of understanding?

Lol, I took a screenshot of this conversation, cause I wanna post it again when Scotland and NI bail LOL. Btw, you playd well against Iceland, no reason to be ashamed of getting your asswhooped by a country so tiny that 8% of its population were in the stands

Scotland's PM has already said she intends to call for another referendum. Saying that there is "zero fucking chance" and pasting a nazi symbol on your reply are not valid points. It's shouting obscenities because you in fact, have no valid counterpoint. There is a chance, and its a pretty good one, the primary reason the referendum to split last time was that they wanted to remain in the EU, according to exit polls. But I am curious, which part of cursing and stating things that are factually false did you think was valid?

It means that the Britbongs managed to piss off the Bilderberg group of elites so gg

seriously? I'm informed and that makes me biased? I read dick, try it.

There's only one core reason most Europeans want to be part of the EU; to compete and best America. That's it. There are secondary reasons (if you're non-white and in Europe, you bet your ass you want the EU).. but it all boils down to envy, jealousy, etc.

They're giving up their freedom, their culture, their fucking everything.. just to be part of a big ball that is as big or bigger than other balls.

It's fucking ridiculous.

There is nothing good about England being part of the EU. Some countries benefit tremendously, obviously. WIthout the EU they'd be even shittier than they already were. But that isn't England. Or France. Or Germany.

Those 3. Think about that for a second. Those three pretty much were the UE.. all the others are just little brothers and goofy younger cousins lol. And England, one of those 3 (!) said FUCK THIS.

That says a lot. It says enough.

GOOD ON YOU, ENGLAND.

The only viable reason Scotland has to leave the UK is to join the EU as a separate Member State. If you had been following real news today you would have seen that Nicola Sturgeon has been in Brussels to discuss this and all she came away with was "sympathy". It would take years for Scotland to gain independent entry to the EU and they know it now

well, England does almost 60% of its trade with the EU, so thats something, if they lose the single market, their exporters will lose a lot of money and jobs will be lost. And it allowed them to be the clearing house for the Euro, so thats a few billion in profit each year and thousands of jobs in the banking sector. So its not nothing man.

OK let me explain to you what you have clearly mis-read. The EU Parliament does not make law. The EU Commission (which you stated has no power) is the true power base. All law is constructed there and all policies are created there. The Parliament is essentially a talking shop. They can refer Bills back to the Commission for redrafting (they cannot draft whatever they like themselves, as you stated). A large part of the drive to reform the EU is around the lack of a democratic process - known as democratic deficiency. The leaders of the EU have themselves been raising this as an issue in the last few days, which makes your statements seem pretty dumb. Schooled.

That's actually entirely untrue. The reason Scotland held the first referendum was because about 40% of the population was extremely unhappy with curernt taxing and governing systems in the UK. That referendum lost primarily, according to exit polls, because they knew it would mean risking EU membership. IF that is no longer a threat, then all the other problems remain and there is no reason not to do it.

Here's the primary economic differences:

1) They can import from China cheaper now, without the EU taking a cut through tariffs.
2) If they want to import from the EU, they have to pay extra tariffs.

You've already heard everything else by now. Blah blah immigrants, sovereignty etc.

The Brits will get their fuckings from by their own government, not the European Commission.

Again you are wrong. Having just held a referendum on that point so recently, they cannot hold another referendum so soon on the same point. This is why they are trying to take the opportunity to use the Brexit vote as a different ground for voting again

Money isn't everything, and England can and will make money despite being part of the big boys club.

It's the same thing with the US. Build a wall? Are you crazy!? It'll hurt your trade with Mexico! You'll lose money!

Trust me, most Americans are fine with that. We're also fine with paying twice as much for veggies if we "deport all illegals".

> As if veggies are a large part of American diets.

Fear-mongering. Congratulations, you've done it well. You're on the side that England can't do great things alone.

You're wrong.

> (You)
>It sounds like you DO have a dog in this fight. Far too much information for a neutral
I think you clicked on the wrong post dude, I was respond to the guy who said I was too informed to be neutral.

I'm full blown mental and unstable. I don't care if civilization implodes. Thanks.

Because there isn't any clear delineation of what they hoped to acomplish. It's not even like migration was a real issue, mind you a lot of people dislike Poles but this was always about the Pakis, Indians and negroes which do not actually come from the EU, it's all rubbish. The cost of memebership in the EU is a lot cheaper than any deal that will come after, the regulations will continue to be a burden except now they won't actually protect consumers, Brits will lose their access to anything human rights within the EU... Some groups in the UK decided to turn Euroskepticism into a political platform only because it was a viable niche to make a living as a politician.

And here's what happened, if you've ver watched the tv show Top gear, and I'm not knocking it is enormously fun, try to imagine what demographic within the UK this show is aimed for. Those are the wankers that voted remain. Them and the old folks who liked Mr. Bean because you know, bloody racists,

they now can deport all sand niggers into camps

Fear-mongering dipshitism. You're idiocy is the equivalent of telling young adults that they shouldn't move out of their parents house.. doom is certain!

> OH GOD NO! DON'T BE INDEPENDENT! YOU'LL FAIL!

Fucking idiots.

I didn't say it was everything. but you said there was "nothing good about England being part of the EU." I was merely pointing out a few good things that come from it.

Elections in Britain are rigged just as they are in America.

And yet whoever does hold power is in the end democratically elected, or do you think the prime minister didn't get a say?

Let's have a """U"""K thread the day it happens then.

Argie nigger here, you guys just lost most of the support to your claim on Malvinas, we are all very happy.

Yeah, I suppose you're right, hmm, if only there was a way to create an exit referendum on one grounds (say freedom of laws), when people are actually voting on different grounds (say, I don't want darkies in my country). But if your position is that there is "zero chance of scotland leaving", thats fine, but I stand by my original statement that you are an idiot oblivious to what every single politician and reporting and citizen of the UK has been discussing over hte last week.

Do you hate the NWO as much as I do?

Holy shit. This guy actually thinks that I was participating in this fucking thread. ha!

Funny enough the rationale for NAFTA was precissely fear of the EU and China...

It's a scale. You can say This or That is "good", but good is relative. The "good" England gains is negated by the "bad".

On one side, the good.
On the other, the bad.

> The bad side just ripped through the floor.

Exactly. How well is NAFTA working out?

It's a shitty fucked up bureaucratic mess that most Americans loath. The only Americans that don't aren't really Americans, or they're illegals.

It's a genius move by the brits actually. In one vote, the average voter managed to cause weakness in the British pound. That leads to improved exports and higher prices on the FTSE. The US had to print money and give it to banks for years to get the same effect since the 2008 collapse. Obama was simply too incompetent to pull something like this off.

I hope president Trump does something similar here.

at least two posts

> NOT PARTICIPATING

Vapid motherfucker.

> Get on Pornhub
> Search for "DUMB BRITISH BLONDE FUCKS 15 MILLION PEOPLE AT ONCE"

How's your libtard 18-21 year old social baby bubble?

kek

I'd imagine there were far more men who voted leave than women. Women always choose the stupid, "my-heart-says-so-derp", decisions.

The EU backlash is designed, from head to toe, to appeal to women.. and other minorities.

They're the weak links. The suckers.

Women are the majority. I largely agree with what you're saying in that 'EU backlash' etc etc is an appeal to the perceived cautious option of staying in the EU.

More likely to affect impressionable, anxious bitches.

Cautiously and very slowly servicing and loading that gun to kill yourself with.

All it means is more meme magic for Great Britain and more Islam to fill the void left in the EU's collective hearts.
>The UK doesn't gain or loose anything

Hail Britannia!