'Murican history skills

'Murican history skills.

Other urls found in this thread:

historynet.com/studebaker-us6-the-lend-lease-deuce-and-a-half.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

france is so accurate

I enjoy how italy isnt fully in the picture. Just like during the real war. Fucking useless wannabe romans

I would put America behinds Britain because they joined so late

USA was pretty irrelevant during the WWII.

The british defeated the Luftwaffe and the Kriegsmarine, while the soviets the elite of the Landwehr.

Actually, americans needed the help of the Royal Navy because the american navy couldnt be capable to defeat the Kriegsmarine near US territory.

Americans fought against the least trained german soldiers and yet they had great losses

Even against the japanese the US wasn't trully relevant until the nuclear bombs.
The Burma Campaign was much more important strategically against the japs than the US pacific wars.

Dinosaurs have been extinct for quite some time

You motherfuckers need education. Idiocracy should only be a novie, not reality.

1 on 1 hitlers army would fuck anyone

>USA was pretty irrelevant during the WWII.
Millennial Retards

Enjoy your failed education

and your welfare babies

Did you totally forget about the pacific theater????

Total bait and ur a faggot

I beat you studied history in America, all your history text books are lies

Who supplied the Russians and the British against against the Germans? Keep trying...

Was Nazi Germany really that big?

Canada should be in there beside Britain, even if it's just a little guy.

Would put Little Brittain on 'muricas dick tho.

I bet you are into revisionist history to deny why the two remaining superpowers after WW2 was the USA and USSR and totally not Britain, France, Germany or Japan.

Live in denial of your impotence

Get outa here dad.

>kek'd

No, in fact I'm pretty sure Russia outnumbered them pretty significantly.

Yep, I've argued this with many Americans who disagree. The USA was too busy in the Pacific with Japan to put an interest in Europe. They only stuck their nose in there when they noticed Russia would take over all of Europe.And the reason they didn't want them to because there was already an established feeling of awkwardness between the two nations. The same way that the Russians were actually supposed to land troops in Japan a few days after the US dropped the atom bombs. But the US didn't want that influence there so they quickly flexed their muscles.And my favorite part of it all being that the US/"Allies-Soviets" wanted to have part of a city that was not even in part of the country they took over.

Why did they fight a war over a sucky nintendo console? Wii DESU

Lmao

>implying they will have babies
>implying they won't be CUCK babies

Pic says it all.
Also OP is a fag

...

Are you stupid or what?

No, If you have read my post, I said that the Burma Campaign was much more important than when the muricaa started to conquer small pacific Islands one by one.

Its simple because the US didnt get involved in the war until the wave was already changing in Europe. Germans were already retrating in East(were their best troops were) and the soviets were attacking.
The infrastructure of the US wasn't affected by the war.

Also, its not revisionism, anyone that knows the basic of history knows that.

They had massive outnumbered their enemies and were best supplied

>European history skills
>Thinks dinosaurs were the ones who fought world war 2

>italy
>wannabe romans

Wtf check your history and geology you fucking stupid cunt

>Italians during WWII are still the same romans as they were during caesar

You know nothing. Read more books.

well thats retarded

>anyone that knows the basic of history knows that.
Yes, but you're talking to Americans. Some of them seem to think that "Team America: World Police" was a documentary.
Those of us educated in countries that DON'T think that "Intelligent Design" deserves equal standing with the theory of evolution know you're right.

yes, canada played a huge part in the war

>geology

Italians are 100% not the same romans as they once were you ar tard.
There has been a huge influx of eastern european people integrated into italy, especially those from countries such as albania and macedonia. So unless they are the same ppl, roman-esque italians are far and few between.

And the holocaust was a lie hitler did nothing wrong, it wasnt a gas chamber it was a fun chamber with indoor petting zoo. Jews are such liers.

It was mainly soviet soldiers given the numbers they had, British planning and military skills and brains, and the USA providing the arms and tools of war

Cant wait until trump, when you need our army to bail your chuck loving ass out of the fire you are going to pay.

What does it fucking matter who did most of the fighting. When it was all said and done what countries came out of it as a world power.

USA USA USA
eurocucks BTFO!

This thread is not about holocaust

...

Now Germany must pay

Eurocucks. Could your countries military beat the U.S's in a one on one fight?

You actually need about 10x more dead Russians in that picture.

Make japan bigger with angry chink eyes taking a dump on the specific oshun

>Even against the japanese the US wasn't trully relevant until the nuclear bombs.

Yeah because when I think of irrelevancy I think of destroying the Imperial Navy, blockading Japan, and destroying Tokyo.

True, when people say America saved Europe in WWII they probably should specify from the USSR.

The fouding myth of Rome is that Eastern peoples came to Italy and built the city.

Also, romans was never a homogeneous people.

Even during the Kingdom of Rome they were a melted pot of various neighboors peoples

Another ungrateful Eurocuck. Eat a fat American dick.

Russia would be speaking German right now if not for the USA.

Holy shit this.

>mfw no Australia, NZ and Canada
>mfw no FFL
>mfw OP is America

draw the american dinosaur giving a fuckton of free shit to basically every ally and itd be more accurate.

Fucking liar. I bet you didn't even watch Jurasic park.

Well i like that france is represented by a chicken kudos on that, but you seem to forget americas great depression or the atomic bomb, that pretty much ended the jap conflict. D-day battle of the bulge, you didnt even include canada in that picture. Are you trying to say canada didn't fight in ww2?

Americans give free stuff to the commies to fight against germans.

It was not the fault of the U.S.A. that Germany and Japan waited until December 1941 to declare war. Do not know when Italy declared war, or if.

Free shit? The UK only finished paying the US back for loans etc from WW2 a few years ago. Jew bastards did nothing for free.

True. Unlike bitchass Singapore (brits) the ANZACS held out down here.

Way to overlook the 10s of millions of tons of supplies the US provided to the UK and soviets to keep them from going under.
Here is one of the examples.
historynet.com/studebaker-us6-the-lend-lease-deuce-and-a-half.htm

Btw the only way to stop a blitzkrieg is with mobility as that is what it runs on.
Until the studebaker was provided to the Russians they were using horses.

Not America's, Hitler didn't stand a chance against us alone and he knew that. Why else do you think he wanted to ally with Japan and tried to get Mexico to ally with him as well? These were inferior races to him and he still wanted to ally with them, because he feared the USA so much.

The Germans did not retreat (actually it was still a strategic withdrawal) until after December 25 1941

Great britain was the real hero in WWII, It endured and sacrificed greaty while standing against Germany on principle, It could've sued for peace early in the war and probably remain in a position similar to Switzerland, or later on it could've surrendered to a status not unlike Vichy France. The Nazis always saw the Soviets as their real enemies anyway... It was largely Hitler going retard on Poland he could've waited it out and negotiated the annexation of German speaking parts of the country within the decade, but they got too greedy on the whole Lebensraum thing. There's no telling how much history could have changed if the Third reich would have chosen a more measured aproach...

Other Murican historical myths are the existence of Republic of Texas and the acquisition of the American West as a "purchase" and not outright armed conquest...

I honestly don't know if half the people in this thread have taken any type of world history especially that of post 1850 world history. no one has the ability to say that America did not help in World War II. it was a collective Allied effort that is without a doubt. but realistically the US was pretty much the only country to be fighting on three different fronts of continents, some obviously outweighed the other, by that I mean the European theater and Pacific Theater and the North African theater. the United States was attacked by the Japs in 1941 at that point almost every country has surrendered or had been pushed back into isolation by the Nazi and Japanese regimes. The US drafted every able man, put to work every able Woman and created an industry that supported a war on three different fronts and gave Aid and equipment to embattled Allied Forces that were stuck in their countries. the only country that still had somewhat of itself together was Great Britain and Russia.:any true historian of French history will tell you that they had lost 90% of their infrastructure and Country to the Nazi regime and it stayed that way until the battle and nvasion of Normandy. if it wasn't for the advancement of the u.s. troops taking back key waterways and giving up hundreds of thousands of lives in in Europe, especially in the Strategic France, England area. European forces especially that of Great Britain wouldn't have been able to advance and bring their forces to strategic areas that were once occupied by the Nazis which majority of were cleared by the United States. The huge influx of power created a shift in balance of Nazi forces which saw them pulling out many of their forces from the Russian front and bringing them to the Western European front and especially of that to hold down Germany if they were to be getting back to their Homeland which of course happened. United States also single-handedly beat the Japanese.

Soviets vs US in damage to the 3rd Reich:

Soviets:
Fought the Germans for 4 years.
Highest motivation as they were fighting for their own homeland.
Right next to their supply source.
No other enemies to deal with at the time.


US :
Fought Germany for less then one year
Moderate motivation as they were fighting for someone elses homeland.
5000+ miles away from their supply source.
Fought the Empire of Japan at the same time and even before fighting the
Germans. Defeating Empire of Japan pretty much by itself.

Hitler wanted mexico to base his troops on the american border it was a strategic move by him.

UK never paid us back for what we gave them in WW1 let alone WW2. In all fairness we should have half of Europe right now, since we earned it, but we were nice and gave it back to the people.

Not true. Most of the debt was never paid, just like the Great War 1914-1918.

Single stupidest thing I've read this year.

nah dude, the hero was russia.

This

Exactly, allying with shit races because he feared us so much, what about this are you not understanding?

Remind me again what General lead the Berlin invasion???

This

Not really, Russia was in deep until the USA bailed them out. If we let it go long enough Russia would have lost everything. Apparently they only teach one sided history where you live.

Before US : Europe conquered, Japan winning

After US : Hitler destroyed, Japan nuked into submission

Go ahead and pull any stat to support your narrative, but everyone knows exactly when the wars direction changed against the axis -12/7/41

But everyone knows WW2 was just British and French propaganda. It never happened.

Don't forget the US sold Britain ships and supplies before they even got involed.

Russia didn't exactly fight a principled war, it pretty much treated its own people as cannon fodder and Stalin commited as many war crimes as Hitler, a "hero" they were not. With all the sacrifices made by the Red Army it still took Hitler repeating Napoleon's mistake to save Russia, if the Nazis had left the handling of the war to the generals rather than politicians the Germans could've at the very least held the Eastern front for a decade.

>single-handedly beat the Japanese
kek, almost had me there.

And they remained unconquered

Hitler was half jewish, this was all a lie no one died, hitler was just giving out free candy and movie pass then america fucked it up.

Tremendous bait.

Russia was never and will never be the hero. They were and still are awful to their own people and everyone else in the world. They are a disgrace to the human race.

It's not bait if it's true.

Yea but no one every seems to recognize we played any part in anything.

Even if true. So what?
The Germans were no where near the US.
The US did not have to lose one man let alone all that they did.
Fight your own shit you UK and Euro faggots.

We did way more then we needed to.
You are welcome faggots.

>Free Frances Forces

Fucking faggot, 400k French soldiers helped retake North Africa.

This, ungrateful fucking haters, next time you faggots work it out on your own. Hope you all kill each other off once and for all.

stasi get

That is fucked. One dino represents a country except USSR, they get a zerg rush? No, they should get one dino to represent them too. Faggot.

oy vey

...

Always remember the Soviets started the war with the Germans.

Says "lets draft every allied nation into every shit kicking contest we can start in third world countries since the second world war".S.A
You manipulative shit stirrers got exactly what you wanted out of that war, so don't pretend to be the valiant heroes. Your government gave the japs pearl harbour.

Except Hitler did not view Mexicans as a shit race, back then Mexico's leadership was white and of the same race as the Spaniards that under their own laws the Germans considered their equal (unlike Americans) This was still an era of colonial thinking, Mexico's de facto caste system was very acceptable to the Germans and they made great efforts to try to mantain friendship with Mexico even if they knew from WWI (the Zimmerman telegram) that it would be difficult. Do keep in mind Mexico was a Nationlal Socialist country at the time, even if left leaning and oposed to fascism in Spain, and that it was one the BIG oil producers of the era, nevermind other valuable commodities such as rubber. That it had distanced itself from the US and the UK by nationalizing oil, mining and most commodity exports was an oportunity for the axis. Keep in mind Benito Musolini was named after Benito Juarez and that there were also connections with Italy from the Garibaldi era. Finally, public opinion, the upper and middle classes in Mexico viewed Nazi germany with good eyes as opposed to Americans who were a traditional enemy. The Nazis did involve themselves in political activism in Mexico and recruited a following. What happened was the US and the UK obviously realizing they needed Mexican neutrality and it's resources (Mexico provided most of Britain's petrol during the war) embarked on a diplomatic camapign. Mexico joined the war on the allies side after two of its oil tankers were sunk by German submarines, in Mexico it has always been suspected that the sinkings were a false flag operation headed by American and British intelligence. The decissive factor here was Cardenas, Mexico's de facto leadership, did despite being a socialist view the US as a natural ally. This was not characteristically Mexican at the time and had any other been in power things could have gone down differently.

We are the hero of WW2, you're just butthurt and pissy because you know it's true.

>tl:dr

Heyyyy.. Where's Canada?

Russians won the war in europe.
We don't learn it in western schools because they like to play up the 'Communist USSR was evil' card (which it kinda was, but stil.. credit where it's due)