When are you fucktards gonna wake up, and realise that this shit isn't "harmless" like you so vehemently protest...

When are you fucktards gonna wake up, and realise that this shit isn't "harmless" like you so vehemently protest. If you can give me one, single, shit-brained reason why promoting and encouraging sexual attraction to prepubescent or adolescent girls/boys is not harmful, then fucking shoot. The more you look at this shit, the more you get off on it, the more you will begin to view children in this way in real life. Maybe those of you who have just developed an interest (2-3 years max) will dispute this. I'm not talking to you, dickheads, I'm talking to those of you who have been afflicted/encouraged for long enough to render a decent judgement. I think those whom I address know full well I'm telling the truth.

shameless self bump

>When are you fucktards gonna wake up, and realise that this shit isn't "harmless" like you so vehemently protest. If you can give me one, single, shit-brained reason why promoting and encouraging sexual attraction to prepubescent or adolescent girls/boys is not harmful, then fucking shoot. The more you look at this shit, the more you get off on it, the more you will begin to view children in this way in real life. Maybe those of you who have just developed an interest (2-3 years max) will dispute this. I'm not talking to you, dickheads, I'm talking to those of you who have been afflicted/encouraged for long enough to render a decent judgement. I think those whom I address know full well I'm telling the truth.


Soooo, loli thread?

...

but they're 2d.
fapping to 2d never hurt anyone

...

>promoting and encouraging
Do paintings of violence promote and encourage violence?

...

It's fucking lines and colors. Art. Absolutely harmless and anyone who disagrees is a full-fledged fucking retard who should not be allowed to breed.

...

What an overcomplicated way to say loli thread

...

Yeah true, only you're completely fucking wrong. Shit like this takes time to pervade. It slowly creeps in a and dominates your psyche, no matter how strongly you draw your lines.

...

And human beings are just cells

...

So you admit that you don't know the difference between reality and fantasy.

I've more into "monster girls" where hentai is concerned, but I don't think it's doing any harm. No more harm than a video game would have turning a kid into a mass murderer. If you don't like it that's fine, but don't sit here as if you're the authority on the subject of psychology.

...

...

yeah, but so what? I get a attracted to 2d lolis.
Nobody else is affected by what kind of drawings I masturbate to

Kek m8

...

wut

>lines and art
That convey a very specific and corrupted message. Message is a weak word. If someone splashed a bunch of random shit on a wall, you wouldn't gain anything from it (unless you were a fucktard modart cuntjob), but these depictions clearly and evidently convey the forbidden and corrupted sexualisation of children. That's why it gets you off, and you are a fucking spastic cucumber if you try to argue otherwise. Wake the fuck up and be honest to yourself man.

...

dude.
They're just drawings

...

Do pictures and videos of people with IQ's below 80 promote and encourage retardism? If so, you should stop watching those videos.

damn.
What a sexy loli.
Who is she?

...

They are when you start to look at children sexually in real life. Then it becomes dangerous and wrong on a whole new level. Maybe you haven't been at it long enough to experience this, but trust me, it will come. Cut it the fuck out before you really regret it.

...

Oh, you're going to try an backstep and pretend that you weren't implying there's no difference between two dimensional lines / colors and human cells?
Fuck off with your weak b8

That's not an answer to my question.
But in answer to your question, no they do not.

So playing gta and cod for the appropriate amount of years means you'll kill people too? Oh wait no depiction doesn't always lead to action does it?

OP, why are you trying to suppress your pedophilic desires?
It's not good for you, trust me. As long as you don't act on them there's nothing wrong with them. Being a closet pedo will just hurt you.

...

I watched Godzilla as a child, but it doesn't mean I'm going to destroy Japan.

But i'm not attracted to 3d kids.
Thats nasty.
Only 2d for me thanks

...

If you watch it for long enough it DOES mean that, retard.

...

Your premise is flawed, friend. This isn't a tool for encouragement, but for control. An outlet for potentially harmful urges, the same way we channel our violent urges into shooter games. It's better to fap over drawn loli than to end up assaulting a child. No victim, no crime.

...

>mentally ill for prioritizing young women who can bounce back much faster from pregnancy and have secondary sex characteristics

Its perfectly natural. amazing how you faggots think that just because something is against your country's arbitrarily set age of consent thats its both immoral and indicative of severe mental illness. there are many, many countries in the world where sex with a 14 year old is perfectly accepted and not at all illegal. human kind has been procreating with people as young for millennia, it is the age where girls and boys start developing secondary sex characteristics that are seen by the other sex and cause them to become sexually attracted to them. biologically speaking, as young as 12 people start becoming sexually attractive to one another (often times earlier than 12), and they start really wanting to experience sex and will flirt with each other because their biology is telling them that not only are they ready for sex physically (menstruation in the case of girls) but mentally as well as they begin to seek out potential partners. in other words: puberty.

and yet you morons think that anyone that could ever be attracted to someone as young as 12 is some kind of fucked in the head psychopath. what a completely ridiculous assertation, you must be one of those retarded americans who derives morality from law and not the other way around. also if you'd step one foot out of your country you'd understand that the "age at which a person is developmentally capable of making the informed decision to have sex" aka consent laws are literally just cultural opinion. educate yourself, faggot. there is literally nothing empirically wrong with being sexually attracted to someone that has started developing secondary sex characteristics, and the majority of the rest of the world outside your shithole view knows that.

Someone is projecting
>it's (you)

Ask yourselves why you look at them in the first place. I'm not trying to shame you into anything. Just be honest. It's because there is already something wrong there. I know you know I'm right. Getting off to this shit and convincing yourself it's "just drawings " and it's "harmless" is a delusion you've slowly built to deal with your affliction.

Checked

OP, theres your answer

Really? How long is "long enough" user?
You actually think that given enough time watching Godzilla will definitely result in the viewer trying to destroy Japan?

...

Did a loli touch you when you were a little boy OP?

Is this whole thread just projection?

Hey, you're the closet pedophile that's projecting on us

Checked

...

>Ask yourselves why you look at them in the first place.
I look at them because I find the art and stories erotic.
The real thing is not. Not everyone is some emotional retard or so removed from reality that they can't see the difference, user.

Is no one going to help me dump?

I know right? Just look at the pain in her eyes.

#1Like1Prayer

I'm in the (un)fortunate position of knowing exactly where and what my sexual appetites stem from. Most people aren't.

Thank you~

project much?

no one would ever do that

Who are you to censor what people think, draw and see? A person's mind is their last haven, and I would not have it censored to fit whatever the popular socially accepted theme is. Look at history; even our own viewpoint in this current day is hopelessly skewed and fallible. You could call this a "trend," as at every point in history the social consensus has been wrong in one sense or another.

Now, I do not argue that this specific topic is "right," as that's another can of worms. However, forcing all of society to expunge and deny existence of thoughts and ideas is inherently wrong and in the long run not a viable solution.

We cannot always control our thoughts, but as sentient beings we should not be disallowed the privacy of our own minds.

At the same time, I can understand the moratorium on - and as a member of society will not tolerate the act of - actualization of "loli" sexual fantasies.

It harms other, vulnerable, people and is in general harmful to society.

But don't tell me I can't think what I wish, and that I am horrible for looking at lines and pigment on paper. That's just nonsense to pump yourself up.

Go join the peace corps and help a third world village or something, if you're really serious about making the world better.

TLDR; Shove it up your ass.

I'm not. I just came to shitpost a bit before I play video games.

Just look at the suffering on this child's face. Someone has to save her.

>you must be one of those retarded americans who derives morality from law and not the other way around

/Thread

So you're upset about being a pedophile that wants to rape children and you want to feel comfort in thinking we are like you?

I'm speaking generally. And if you genuinely believe that this does not skew your view of children in reality, then kudos to you. But I find it hard to believe.

Cherry picking arguments will only make yours seem stronger to yourself. Your delusion is your viewpoint sees itself as fact, not one of many perspectives. Listen and you will know why they look at them.

Bro, I've been into loli since my freshman year of highschool 10 years ago. I have never once had a problem distinguishing reality from fantasy. Today I am a happy father to a 4-year-old son and my girlfriend, his mother. Once in a while some neighbor girls from next door comes over to hang out with him and my girlfriend. Not once have I ever had such a degenerate thought upon the youth of real life.

but im only attracted to 2d

Elaborate you friggen fudgepop.

Aw, bummer. Those few posts help thought~

>MFW this isn't copypasta.

Nigga be serious.

I think the problem is more with you.
You like to see children as completely removed from sexuality because that's how society has evolved.
It could very well be the reason for the increasing number of transexuals, gays, etc... in recent decades.

Of course, given enough time watching that you'll be trying to destroy japan.
Just ask OP, he's an expert in this subject.

>counter projecting

Nah I'm upset because I still see people on here and elsewhere, every day, pretending to themselves with fragile arguments that it's okay so long as it's just 2d pixels.

...

Due to human life span naturally being till 30 has been raised to 70-100, those in the range of puberty (8-13) are around the same age for natural attraction to happen, due to our instincts still being wired for 30 or so years of life.

As society has grown so has a thing called "morals" which make it so theses attractions are "wrong", those who are attracted to said stuff, are just being true to their natural instincts.

As such only thing wrong about it, is society and their stupid morals.

...

wtf kind of logic is that

Convey an alternative view.

That's a lie.

Lol, fuck off. Children are not removed from sexuality. They are just not competent in any sense of it.

So you're upset because you turned out to be a pedophile and others didn't?
I know it's not fair, and I know it must be hard, but you're not a bad person if you don't act on your desires OP. I promise it'll be okay.

Bondage anyone?

...

...

...

Oh, I get it OP. You're some kind of new breed of white knight who thinks he's noble for defending the rights of drawings.
Maybe you should use that energy to protect the rights of those who, you know, actually exist.

>Children are not removed from sexuality. They are just not competent in any sense of it.
See its shit like this that make you look like a fucking idiot.
First you make one statement, then you make a contradictory one while also using the word competent as though that were there point. The point is not competency in sexuality, its any sort of involvement. Sexuality doesn't equal sexual intercourse.

...

...

cmon man

Because I got sick and tired of tentacle porn, tbh. Out there, without being guro sickening (I seriously can't do that shit. insta bonerkiller).

Been a fetish for a good while, but srsly, I don't think I could get off doing it with some young doe-eyed girl. Nice image, but I need a little bit of that sin that comes from living in this world and seeing through the flowers and butterflies.

And I couldn't fuck something that didn't want me back. That's just degrading to me, which is intolerable.

I don't have an issue with sexual attraction to sexually mature females with a decent enough time to understand sexuality themselves. This, of course, comes at different times for different people. I'm talking about prepubescent and early-adolescent girls. No way to justify that, even with pseudo-evolutionary arguments.

>That's a lie.
>N-n-no user, I reject your reality! LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

Cry some more, at least one of us knows what reality is.

...

...

...

>prepubescent
>adolescent
Which one? If you're not already instinctually attracted to adolescent members of the opposite sex, then there's most likely something wrong with you. The whole point of instincts was so that species would engage with sexually mature members of the opposite sex, in order to procreate. Species which did not have this instinct did not procreate.

Since you're a member of a species, that means that you have this instinct. You can pretend not to, because you're scurred of society, but you still have it, or else you're infertile or something. As such, art provides a release valve for people who have this instinct, so that they can relieve their natural, instinctual urge to go deposit sperm into the uterus of sexually mature biological adults, such as 13 year old adolescent little girls.

Yes, I just said that most 13 year old adolescent girls are sexually mature biological adults. I'm sorry if that contradicts your sensibilities on the matter, but science is rather adamant about this point. If a member of a species is capable of procreating, then they are sexually mature adults, no matter what your legalities are in your state, or what your preferences are on the matter.

...

Children have a really fucking basic idea of what gender and sexuality is. Literally every erotic drawing or picture of a child is posing, And that should tell you something. They don't really understand the meaning of sex and sexuality. Any fucking idiot can see this.