ITT: Sup Forums proves to itself that it cant do math

ITT: Sup Forums proves to itself that it cant do math.

6

Oh look its this thread again

9

Gonna have to go with nine, fun stuff though

>6/2(1+2)
>6/2(3)
>3(3)
the answer is 9

It's 9 you dumb cunt

15

Basic 1st grade question. It's 9.

The answer is b.

21

...

0 !!

I do like this :

6/2(1+2) || 6/2*3

so

2*3=6 and 6/6 = 0

ZERO !

you fucking idiots

...

How did you get this number, retard?

...

6
----------
2(1+2)


6
-------
2(3)


6
----
6


1

Ho yeah right ! i 'have to go back in high scool.

So stupid i'm.

It's clearly 7.

1

first, your order of operations is wrong
second, any number divided by itself will always be 1
it's not 6/(2(2+1))
if you wanna throw parentheses around, it's (6/2)(1+2)

holy shit
6 / 2 (1+2)

6
=----------
2 (1+2)

6
=----------
2 (3)

6
=----------
6

=1

Uno

11 fck faggots

I know the answer!

It's "Fuck off back to your own faggot board"!

It's fucking nein

Triggerd

look dawg
2(2+1)
replace (2+1) with n
n always goes with 2
the simplest way to explain it

...

Pls anons at least take a piece of paper and practice once in a while

Shit

You actually don't know how to do math. Get lost faggot

fuck you

nigger

bbt

wow Sup Forums really is overrun with 10 year olds

PEMDAS
Parenthesis comes first. This means distributing the 2(1+2) = (2+4) = 6
Exponents are not included
MDAS are done in order from left to right
6 รท 6 = 1

alright, explain

>if you wanna throw parentheses around, it's (6/2)(1+2)
FALSE
You don't get to just add parentheses wherever you want, doing that changes the equation entirely.

no, you retard

6/2 (1+2)

6/2 (3)

3*3

9

not in this case

you faggots need to clear the parenthesis first

parentheses first does not mean distributing the 2(1+2)
that's multiplication
parentheses first just means doing whatever's inside the parentheses first, meaning (1+2) becomes (3)
true, wasn't thinking when i wrote that, what i should've said was, "stop throwing parentheses around you fucking morons"

6/2(1+2)=
6/2(3)=
6/6=1

Retards

ITT

>6/6 = 0

Yeah i'm a faggot and all my life for understand thing and stop to be on Sup Forums like a fuking fag

distributing doesn't fall under the parenthesis step, it falls under the multiplication step
The question is bait because nobody who does math writes division like that
Yeah technically the answer is 9 but you only do math like this if you're in fucking elementary school
in big boy math the question would be written differently and the answer would be 1

it's 12 you fucking morons.

>clear the parenthesis first
maybe you're right, its not like the parenthesis act like multiplication signs

...

>6/2(3)=
>6/6=1
you just went from right to left for some reason...

i just did dude
n is 2's member (thats how we call it here)
you cant separate them

multiplication and division are in the same step, and neither takes priority over the other, so after doing the parentheses you would start back at the beginning and look for multiplication or division.
since division comes first, 6/2, you do that first, which gets you 3, then you start from the beginning again and the equation is now 3(3) or 3*3, so you do that and you get 9

>6/2(1+2)
>6/2(3)
>6/6
>1
the answer is 1

/2(3)
/6
see

do the problem out with that logic, i'm curious as to how you interpreted it

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

why would you write it that way. 6 is the numerator and everything else is the denominator.

6/2(1+2)

so you just replied to everyone, including those that got the correct answer using the correct order of operations, reminding them of the order of operations?

your baits are far beyond autistic

I'm not really sure what you mean, would that make the answer one?

6/2(3)=9
6/2=3
6=6

the answer is 9

here's another

6/2(3)=9
6(3)=18
6=6 or 3=3

what the fuck
are you that retarded what are you even doing

9

what bait? just do the fucking problem, are you some kind of math illiterate so you're just trying to avoid showing me what you're talking about?

Yes
:^)
The answer is one , using the only operations to solve this basic math

...

it's called math, user

doubly retarded or just trolling

ITT: retards that don't know that multiplication and division is done in the same step from left to right

you see, this would be a valid solution, if we already knew the answer and we were trying to find a missing variable or something, but this isn't algebra, this is a test of Sup Forums's knowledge of the order of operations. you passed, but in the wrong way, and a lot of the people in this thread seem to forget their order of operations or just flat out don't know how to do grade school math

wow you fucked up good

you have to divide the 6 by 3 too, faggot

2/2=3

1 =\= 3, obviously

NO

JUST NO

YOU DIVIDE THE 6 AND THE 2 AND THEN MULTIPLY THE 3 BY 3 YOU HALF INBRED POTATOS

>but muh pemdas

YEAH YOUR PEMDAS HAVE THE MULTIPLICATION AND THE DIVISION AS THE SAME FOOKING STEP, TO ADD TO THAT, PEMDAS FUNTIONS LEFT TO RIGHT YOU GARDEN WORMS

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

what do you think the P stands for, you autist?

6 / 2(1+2)=?
6=x
2=y
1=z
x / y*(z+y)=6 / 2*(1+2)
x=6*y*(z+y)/2*(1+2)
/2*(1+2)=2*3=6=x/
x=6*y*(z+y)/x
x^2=6yz + 6y^2
x^2-6y^2-6yz=0
/z=1=2/2=y/2/
x^2-6y^2-3y^2=0
x^2-9y^2=0
(x-3y)*(x+3y)=0
x=3y OR x=-3y
if x=3y then x/y(y/2+y)=3y/y(y/2+y)=1/y * 3/(3*2) = 1/y * 2 = 1/2 * 2=1;
if x=-3y then x/y(y/2+y)=-1;
you fags cant into math.

uhhhh NO

It's not 2x3, it's 2(3). If you actually ok math you would know the difference.

PARENTHESIS the means you multiply whats INSIDE the parenthesis, you crippled degenerate

Jesus Christ, so many retards
>6/2 (2+1)
>6/2(3) or 6/2*3, for those who don't know that when a number in parentheses by itself next to another number, means multiplication
>PEMDAS, but MDAS is left to right so 6/2=3
>3*3
>9
Learn basic arithmetic you fuckers

idk if you guys are all idiots or what, the answer is clearly 69.

please be b8
please tell me ur havin a giggle

Please tell me you are really not this ridiculously stupid

parentheses just means you do PEMDAS inside the parentheses, not specifically multiplication
no, that's the same thing

NEIN

oh really?

6/2(1+2)=9

BIDMAS

Brackets
Indices
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction

> implying that you aren't the stupid one

then why is there a distinction between the * and () signs, you stupid fuck? go ask your 3rd grade math teacher how to do this-- hope she doesn't flunk you for being such a steadfast imbecile

Implied multiplication shouldn't change the order, but some people are of the opinion that it does.

Either way that expression is ambiguous and should never be written like that.

6/2(1+2) = x
6/2(3) = x
6/6 = x
1 = x

the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division

if you wanted to write 6 on 2 all multiplied by 1 + 2 it'd be
(6/2)(1+2)

what goes on inside the parenthesis stays inside the parenthesis (till its done, then the parenthesis no longer exist)

all these kids who already forgot how parenthesis work...
only operations INSIDE the parenthesis have priority
multiplication does not get priority because it is operating on a parenthetical statement from the outside
that's just a normal multiplication at that point and gets weighted the same as the rest of the multiplication and division outside the parenthesis

6/2(1+2)

2(1+2)
=
(2*1)+(2*2)
=
2+4
=
6
(Paretheses are solved at this point)

So we van state that
6/2(1+2)
=
6/6
=
1

alright alright i see your point


USE A FUCKING CALCULATOR

put in
5(5)
(5)(5)
5*5
THEY WILL ALL BE THE SAME, you malformed pinworm

>the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division
no it doesn't
go back to school

>the lack of a multiplication symbol implies a priority over the division

/thread

dude you cant just add parentheses how ever you want