Did anyone actually listen to the FBI Director's explanation for why he is not recommending any charges?
I found them to be... reasonable. They aren't going to waste time on a case they won't win, and even though I'd have loved to see her burned at the stake over this... he outlined very clearly all the reasons why that just wouldn't happen here.
Disappointing, but not (in my opinion) tinfoil hat worthy. Your thoughts?
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
fbi.gov
youtube.com
twitter.com
You got a link for us?
its what the voters think that matters. she is not as well liked as they make her out to be.
this looks like affluenza more than anything else.
Maybe he just likes the taste of, you know... breathing.
It's all over the news, pick your favorite outlet. Or use this one:
nytimes.com
I watched it live this morning.
Paid shill
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."
This fucking paragrapgh made my blood boil
Official Statement:
fbi.gov
tl;dr:
He says that it is a felony to mishandle classified information in a grossly negligent way, and basically says that her e-mail threads contained 110 or more classified e-mails, and essentially says that they were handled in a negligent way. But, he says that because the quantities weren't "vast" and that it didn't seem to be willful or malicious, that it wasn't the sort of thing that would normally be prosecuted. He does say that people would normally face sanctions, I'm guessing something like losing their clearance. But, he says they are not deciding to do that either...
...
Why? Security or administrative sanctions are outside his purview (also she doesn't hold that job anymore).
Seriously? This is great news! When do I get paid, and how much? :)
So because she doesn not hold that position she should not be accountable?
If you violate company policy, the company can write you up, fire you, or whatever. If you quit your job and they find out about it later, they can't retroactively fire you earlier.
The government works the same way, unless what you're doing is criminal.
yet if when i had top secret clearance did exactly what she did i would of been charged, lost then gone to prison. so why is it "reasonable" that she isn't at least charged? the answer is because the system is rigged and normal people have to follow the law while important people don't
> He does say that people would normally face sanctions, I'm guessing something like losing their clearance. But, he says they are not deciding to do that either...
Right - because "they" (the FBI) aren't responsible for deciding to do that.
She's no longer in the position. She can't be subjected to administrative action by the FBI, which has no jurisdiction over the office of the Secretary of State - unless there are criminal charges filed, which he has suggested would be futile.
Just because the FBI gets pissed off at someone doesn't mean they can arbitrarily get them fired (she is already out of that job). As for her clearance, that is going to depend on who issued it: the Department of Justice doesn't have carte blanc authority over clearance granted by, say, the Department of Defense for example.
Long story short: she should definitely get her clearance revoked, but that wasn't his call and besides it will be a moot point if she gets into the white house.
the secret meeting with her cuck on the tarmac with djo is what got me super pissed
Because a group of people who really wanted to put her ass in jail, and who know the law a whole hell of a lot better than YOU do, reviewed the evidence at hand, and determined that she would not be convicted by any reasonable court. So, they being smarter than you about these things, decided against the colossal waste of time and money it would have been, and even though he clearly explained and articulated the exact reasons WHY she could not be convicted, you already tabbed over to shemale porn anyway.
With the big difference that now she is running for president and she is not accountable for any of her actions. Its like if you messed up un your company and then ask to be the CEO
Kind of not the same thing at all.
Snowden admitted to willingly exposing
top secret information. HRC didn't admit to crap
except being ignorant about technonolgy. Also,
HRC put top secret documents at risk, she didn't
hand them over to wikileaks. I'm not even an hrc
supporter but that's a shit meme.
Accountable: if the American public can understand what she did and why she is obviously an inept and untrustworthy cunt, her bid is already destroyed. And if not, you all fucking deserve her.
The bad news is, you DON'T really deserve the alternative, but those are the choices: cat shit or dog shit.
If you had top secret clearance you wouldn't have
been in any position to do what she did.
That is very sad but very very true
how about yellowstone erupting
>they" (the FBI) aren't responsible for deciding to do that.
They aren't, they can only make a recommendation to the justice department.
Turd sandwhich or giant douche
so would you like to know where there are drones on permanent patrol waiting on orders to kill certain people in the country who could be a threat to national security or just bring to light certain things that would lead to issues for current politicians?
I'll email you the details but I'm just negligent in handling this so i shouldn't be in trouble right?
...
lel what am i supposed to be proud of the trillionaire industrialists, shit skins, white race traitors, police state...please tell me
She's not going to be indicted or charged with anything because the election has already been predetermined. Welcome to indirect democracy.
>FBI director
>Get murdered
Please be b8
What I'm saying, jackass, is most people with a top secret clearance wouldn't even be able to have a server set up in their house.
...
Frank Underwood had one dipshit
>drones on permanent patrol
Hahahahahha ! Shut the fuck up.
Truth! Suck a dick
Unlikely to be CONVICTED != Did Nothing Illegal.
The director basically said she was a douche, but didn't douche all the way up to the bar of "we can nail a conviction" - so it wasn't worth the effort to go through the motions.
That's not the same as saying she did nothing illegal (she clearly did). It's more like saying, it's really fucking hard to get a conviction in these cases unless these conditions are met, they weren't (because it's a high bar) - so she's a lying douche, but this is a waste of time.
Don't forget me!I used a personal server, too, like Uncle Colin.
NONE of our emails even exist, zozzle
This. More retards should read this.
Scoreboard. Hilary - 1. Hater Republicans - 0
It's a copy pasta you dip
LOL.
Score: millions of enlightened Americans, v. - well, you.
She's completely unelectable at this point. Your sad crew will figure that out here in a few.
>Scoreboard. Hilary - 1. Hater Republicans - 0 - Sup Forums user 5555
we win in numbers
I broke the law before
I had to go to jail.
I had like 9 grams of pot, and did 10 months.
The fuck this white bitch did????
This is 100% bullshit
Yes. I am a crew of one! You be good at enlightening
Also. Scoreboard
go be a nigger smoewhere else. the actions of a person have nothing to do with you. you are accountable if you fuck up. be more careful next time.
She was just "extremely careless", no biggie. Its not like she will be in charge of nuclear launching or something if she became president.
It just shows how incompetent she is and absolutely nobody that is that incompetent should be president of anything.
>trump 2016 (by default)
more likely is that the FBI "interview" this weekend was nothing more than her offering for him to keep his job once she gets elected.
>libcucks defending their terrible nominee no matter what.
Missed the point completely.
"personal server"
Either you're intentionally dishonest or you need to check your facts. Dame Kankles is the only one with a wholly owned and controlled server. Use of a personal email service, owned and operated by another entity, is inherently different than what she did.
oh i forgot the part where she is currently running for the highest office in the country
oh wait
>Dame Kankles
My sides just went into orbit of Jupiter with Juno.
nope I didn't. you are angry bc she didn't get charged while you did with something you consider as not as wrong as what she did. don't get me wrong, I find it rediculous to send send someone to prison for some weed, BUT if it is ilegal and you know you might get prison time for it, then even if she got away with murder, it doesn't have anything to to with you.
There is NO PRECEDENT for indictment over this kindof behaviour.
That's more of an indictment of the entire Department, but still.
It wasn't just reasonable, it's the only sensible solution. There's no proof of wrong-doing or willful misconduct, it was just a group of people doing something very stupid.
It wasn't just Hillary, is the thing. Anyone who interacted with her over an insecure line about classified stuff would ALSO have to be indicted, and that's just not going to happen.
This, like many other attacks on Hillary, are a non-issue.
Think instead of what it means about the government in GENERAL that this kind of gross negligence isn't a big deal.
And here the rest of the world was laughing their asses off at the Brits for Brexit, but amerifags seriously want that no1 spot for being the biggest & stupidest cunts.
what the fuck are you talking about?
The only way we'll look as bad as the Brits and their Brexit is if Trump gets elected.
Regardless, espionage
oh yeah sure she totally is an enemy of the state
It's all over. This shit about no charges being filed, Loretta Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton... it's a wrap.
Hillary has already paid off, and killed off everyone she had to and will be the next president. It sure doesn't seem like people are getting as upset at this as they should be. This shit is a fucking joke, it's blatantly obvious shady shit is going down and as much as I want Trump in there, it ain't going to happen
Mark my words, screenshot this.
>Want Trump in there
*Facepalm*
>as opposed to the alternative given her track record
facepalm indeed
I know right? Just look at her!
it's a choice between two lying egotistical megolomaniacs
one lies less than the other
im going with her
>Knowingly use unsecure servers for confidential emails
Oh, I'm sorry, I won't do it again
>Husband meets with Loretta Lynch IN PRIVATE to discuss "grandchildren, and golf"
Oh, I'm sorry, I won't do it again
You cannot make this shit up
take it over to pole you fagits.
The hillary side is missing a shitload of scandals. I'll take false equivalency for 500 Alex
Just to be clear, "doing something very stupid" with classified information is a felony, and is "wrong-doing", even if it isn't "willful misconduct".
not everyone gets charged with felonies in america
do you understand how hard it is to indict the entire state department
it's a problem of logistics. If they indicted her without indicting everyone it's clearly a political attack. If they indict everyone it's impossible.
But if you did that would be so bad-ass American!
>i'm going with her
Well, at least you're honest about supporting a corrupt career politician with a long list of lies and dead bodies on her hands.
Lies less? I hate Trump and I know those so called "studies" are disingenuous at best and bullshit at worst. She might lie less frequently, bUT she clearly has no respect for the rule of law and lies bigger. She's only off the hook because of who she is. Literally any other person, besides Bill, would be looking at going to trial. But Hillary has all of Washington in her pocket, so she gets yet another free pass. If you vote for her, it means you think that the Purge should be for everyone, year round.
this is what people will be thinking.
she got let off kid. no need for the damage control. sounds like you are trying to convince yourself.
it's in the hands of the justice department anyhow.
Money was definitely exchanged. Those who don't play ball....
oh look more damage control.
sure kid
so you admit she lies.
Even if one were to hypothetically accept the premise that she somehow lies less, there is a significant difference between someone that has held elected and appointed office and took a sworn oath, and a private businessman who has heretofore not undertaken an express promise to abide by and uphold the rule of law.
...
Hillary was Secretary of State, she is responsible for everything that happens within the state department unless the President makes a mandate overriding her, even then it is her mission to carry out the mandate. Hillary by being careless about her emails containing confidential information and everyone that interacted with her set a precedent in the state department that anything goes; this is a careless and willful disrearguard for the American Public.
I hope people aren't that dumb. I know Jim Comey, he's an honorable man and I guarantee he wasn't bribe nor was he promised a job. I can say with certainty he did his job and was totally on the level. You can be sure it went the way it did because a prosecutor said "go after Hillary?! Are you out of your fucking mind? "
Remember when Hillary said she admired Margaret Sanger, calling her a"trailblazer" and shit like that when Margaret Sanger was a self-confessed racist who started Planned Parenthood to eradicate black people and frequently spoke at Klan rallies?
How come more people aren't talking about that, especially the black liberals voting for Hillary?
>Did anyone actually listen to the FBI Director's explanation for why he is not recommending any charges?
>I found them to be... Apples. They aren't going to waste time on a case that's Apples, and even though I'd have loved to see her Appled at the Apples over this... he outlined very clearly all the Oranges why that just wouldn't happen here.
>Apples, but not (in my opinion) Oranges worthy. Your thoughts?
Your political code is: 1111010
I agree with everything you just said. I am voting for Trump, despite the fact that he is a Disney Villain, for this reason among others.
better a disney villan than the real thing...
What if she were to just get hacked again? It would completely destroy any trust her voters would have in her.
actually true libcucks stick with Bernie. We hate this cunt as much as you do. Hillary's base is a bunch of sludge brained feminazis who think that a woman would make a good president regardless of evidence otherwise simply based on the fact that she has a sweaty saggy cooch.
I've been reading most of this on WaPo and TheHill but I've never seen anyone point out which law she was accused of breaking.
Can someone point me to the reference or law? I'm curious to see what was the legal charge/argument.
This is accurate, they are voting her the same reason they voted obama, some arbitrary attribute they decide needs to be in the white house for a go round.
I hope most of the Berners don't jump ship to her too. I'd rather see Trump as president than hillary, and that's saying something. This election is literally a nightmare scenario I came up with 10 years ago. I honestly can't believe the American people are retarded enough to allow it. I hope China invades, we deserve tyranny for a while
Good point Correct The Record I am now #MentallyHill
I can't cite the statute, but Congress made negligent handling of potentially classified documents a felony.
>Gross negligence isn't a crime
>Excuse me while I go drink and drive
I'm waiting for Trump's Disney villain song. Those are always the best in the movie.
She's a corrupt person. She breaks the law. The clintons get away with things that would have any low level person in prison. This isn't news sadly. Even if she was going to get prosecuted I wouldn't have been shocked if she got pardoned. The best we can do against her is cast doubt about her integrity and just destroy her image. The best we can do/try do to do is deny her being president. Nothing good will come from her being president
Google these
18 USC §793
18 USC §1924
18 USC §798
18 USC §2071