WHAT IF THE LIFE WE FIND IN OTHER PLANETS IT IS NOT NEITHER ANINAL NOR VEGETABLE...

WHAT IF THE LIFE WE FIND IN OTHER PLANETS IT IS NOT NEITHER ANINAL NOR VEGETABLE? WHAT IF THERE IS SOMETHING IN THE MIDLE? OR JUST SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFETENT? WOULD A LIFE WITH TWO SUNS MEANING THERE IS NO NIGHT NEED TO SLEEP OR REST SOMEHOW? LETS USE Sup Forums IMAGINATION WITH POSSIBLE ALIEN LIFE.

What if we find life on another planet and they enjoy the taste of our flesh? And then they start breeding us to get fatter and they kill off all the skinny, weak, defective (niggers, not edible) etc?

Nice. You have more?

Didn't we already find those on Venus?

And then they post it to Sup Forums, killing us like those chinese killing dogs with a blow to the head and then eating them. While these alien invaders neckbeards sit in their mother's basement, user, go out and find a female user and quit being a virgin?

Wot

While the neckbeard aliens living in their mother's basement dismiss this as fake and gay

We are carbon based life forms, so if there was another life forms in other planets they would be like gold based life forms, or any element

What if there is a life in a gaseous state?

Earth's elites will 'liberate' their resources from them in the name of 'Democracy.'

THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

Doubtful. It's not just some random ass coincidence that we are carbon based. Carbon is plentiful, stable, and reacts with a lot of other elements easily with common natural sources of energy like radiation from stars, lightning, heat, etc. Gold is rare and not likely to react with much of anything.

I saw a youtube video, probably from MinutePhysics (spelt wrong on purpose) about something like this.

Comparing to other earth lifeforms, ET's would be bigger than us, probably the size of a horse, live in ~300 member groups and total population just a few millions.
The reasoning was that community animals (like ants or us) tend to be smaller in size but big numbers while bigger animals live in smaller communities (like elephants). The planet they used was like earth, but smaller and on a small red dwarf star.

You seem to know about this shit. What other elements would be a good base for life?

you mean like a cloud like organism that has a language consisting of different smells?

Not poster but silicon and carbon are the only elements suitable for life. Look it up. Google biotch

Interesting

Why not?

not really, but silicon based like could be possible.

not likely
because of the stellar cycle elements smaller than iron are the most common in the universe
of those elements carbon is the most common with the most varieties of chemical bonds
silicone is the next most common, but being a metalloid it causes compounds containing it to have properties not conducive to life
the other "other nonmetals" are phosphorous and sulfur, which again make highly acidic compounds not conducive to life

there already is non vegetal non animal life you tard

thats not how things work holy shit Sup Forums the place where faggots act like even bigger faggots

K go back to traps and dick ratings threads.

I imagine an energy being. If a life form could master and control the subatomic energies were just now discovering they could in theory manipulate the matter that makes up their bodies. Maybe they'd be like ghosts able to walk through walls using the empty space between the protons electrons in their atoms passing straight through the walls atoms. Maybe they created us out of nothing it would be easy. Maybe they said let there be light and a shit ton of energy exploded very suddenly creating all the matter in our universe. Just a thought

Life as we know it I guess...
what about a new element that could be as useful as carbon to a lifeform?

Since we're on a nerdy topic...

Could intelligent vegetal/fungi life be possible?

Think the Supox or the Mycon from Star Control 2 for reference

>Maybe they said let there be light and a shit ton of energy exploded very suddenly creating all the matter in our univers

Assuming you're referring to the Big Bang. That theory does not state that matter was created by the bang. All matter in the universe condensed into a single point before rapidly expanding. Nothing was created.

>what about a new element that could be as useful as carbon to a lifeform?
a new element would be rare
because of the stellar cycle
like I stated
and it would be huge, making it unlikely to be useful in chemical reactions
and it would also be unstable
making it even more rare as it would quickly deteriorate into a smaller atom

But in the first few moments of the Big Bang none of that energy could be called matter. Like in a black hole all the rules of physics are out the window. And a black hole doesn't compress like whatever was before the bang. So yes the energy was there but there was no 'matter' as we know it

>Could intelligent vegetal/fungi life be possible?
no
because plants and fungi by definition do not have nervous systems
there might be something with a nervous system that can not be classified as animal and with traits that are currently only found in plants that is intelligent

what if light is actually a life form and we are merely feeding off of it in order to survive?

But gold is - in comparison to carbon - highly reactive. Go to school faggot

Not very likely. Lifeforms here would very likely be toxic to them because of differences in biological make up. Then there's viruses. Mercury may be completely harmless to them but there may be elements prevalent on Earth that is deadly to them.

Venus Flytraps. Duh.

...

oxygen is highly caustic
anaerobic terrestrial life will die when exposed to small amounts of O2
however, cyanide is beneficial and some times necessary to those organisms
the reason it is toxic to aerobic life is because it bonds with oxygen stronger than iron preventing the oxygenation of blood cells

>silicon and carbon are the only elements suitable for life
NO, we do not know this. There is no reason to think life would be limited to 2 elements. We haven't found life elsewhere so we don't have anything to base that one. Not life as we know it.

It's pretty safe to assume that alien life would be made out of the same ingredients right like carbon water trace metals. But if life started on another planet or large moon totally separate from this corner of the galaxy there'd be zero chance their dna would look anything like ours. I've heard we share like half our dna is identical to a banana. Even viruses technically not life use dna so how different could life get if they don't even use dna in the first place?

Yeah, we do know this because we know basic chemistry. Life isn't just animated raw material. An organism is a walking sack of chemical reactions.

I just want to date whatever sentient being we find.

>Vipers exist
>They find Earth
>XCOM 2 our shit but without the silent genocide
>WWYD?

but we do know the chemical properties of carbon and silicon
and we do know that the chemical properties of carbon are what allowed life to occur on Earth
and even though that is a very small sample size
it is a very telling sample size
especially when coupled with the fact that ALL known life is carbon based
if other elements were suitable for life they would exist on Earth even if it were in very small numbers

But thats because we all come from the same thing here in earth. We wont share dna with life in other planets for sure.

If an intelligent alien landed in your backyard and you shot it and cooked it up would that be murder or hunting

wat if there is no life in the universe and we are all living in a puter simulation created by ancient robutts?

OKAY
BUT WHY ARE YOU SCREAMING?

If not animal or vegetable
Then it must be fruit
I dunno man, apples are pretty earthly

read a report sometime last year where an experiment was done that could prove the universe was simulation and/or hologram and its results pointed to it not being so

On earth, but an argument can be made abhor how vast the universe is, let alone how vast the already explored parts of it are alone.

again
if other elements were capable of reacting in ways that cause life
those elements would have caused life on Earth

and also again
we know the chemical properties of all stable elements
none of them react in ways that are conducive to life

THEY SAY IN SPACE NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM, I WOULD LIKE TO TEST THIS THEORY!

Dude what if, like, our solar system is actually just an atom. Like, you know waht I mean man. like the nucelus is teh sun and shit. the planets are the electrons or whateever. that would make this solar system aan oyxgen adom. and like the galaxy is just a molecule, and all the galaxys togather3 are a speck of dust on some dogs' nose, and he's on a plenat thats in a solarsystem thats an atom in a galaxyy thats a molecule in a bunch of galaxys that are just like part of a speck of dust on another dogs nose and shit. nomsayin?

Thing is solar system works by gravity and molecules and its electron doesnt. So i dont think so

I like it.

Excuse me, I was referring to the absence of undiscovered elements, which may or may not be present elsewhere in our universe, and the possibility of those that are capable of producing life

Fuck off, he knows his shit

Those undiscovered elements would be high on the periodic table, meaning they would be extremely heavy, unstable, and rare beyond belief. And frankly, based on the age of the universe, they do not exist.

This man, right fucking here, just fucking won.

i mean if you think about it, the oxygen/air we breathe is probably poisonous to other intelligent lifeforms

oh my god, how fucking retarded are you?

Here's where the discussion takes a nose dive into people calling each other faggots.

Or nose dives into weird porn, I'm going weird porn route.

It is poisonous to us too. It's what make us get older.

Find one flaw with my waifu, I fucking dare yo uto try, none, at all

Why would they be ? And please do excuse me, my lack of knowledge in chemistry I'm trying to make up for in philosophical reasoning, which is just me asking a lot of questions and saying what if. So if you can bare with me! I'd love to continue discussing why there couldn't be new elements that are capable of producing life.

yeah but i don't mind dying so i can move on to something else

still not my weirdest porn.

Cool broh

Agreed, I like to continue talking without erupting into chaotic faggotry.

I know
and my reply took that into account
the smallest undiscovered element is ununennium (element 119) with an estimated atomic weight of 315
for comparison
plutonium is element 94 with an atomic weight of 244
all unknown elements would be too unstable to last long enough to be used in chemical reactions necessary for life as well as being so radioactive that any life near it would be in serious danger

Put down the marijuana

Gold does not accept bonds like carbon does.. silicon is probably the closest thing another entity could be based on, maybe methane, but carbon is the most workable element. Easily bonds to other elements essential for biological functions.

The order of the periodic table has a reason. Believe that guy he knows his shit

Because newly discovered elements do not last long enough to form stable bonds with other atoms, because they're just too big. I think this has to do with a greater chance of quantum tunneling, which causes radioactive decay (which I believe is still theory). They fall apart into much smaller, more stable atoms through radioactive decay. Radioactive decay is when the nucleus of atoms 'push' out components of the 'core', like helium in alpha decay, an electron or maybe a neutrino in beta decay, and energy in gamma, xray, and other decays, this makes the atom smaller, and forms a smaller element with completely different properties.

>Implying there are actually other planets and we haven't been lied to about space travel our whole lives.

also you don't seem to understand what the stellar cycle is
>stars fuse hydrogen into helium
>once enough helium is made and falls to the core, stars start fusing helium and hydrogen into lithium through silicon
>once stars have made enough of those elements and they have made their way to the core, stars start fusing those into phosphorus through iron
>once stars start making iron-56 , the iron consumes more energy than it releases causing the core to cool making the star collapse under its own weight and explode
>during those rare and brief explosions all elements heavier than iron are made
so anything heavier than iron exists in such small dispersed quantities that they can not be used in the basic chemical reactions of life, and are only used by organism rarely and in small quantities if at all

>explode
or to be more precise
>implode with such force that the implosion continues through the core and turns into an explosion

SHUT UP FAGGOT

it rebounds off the core... doesn't go through it.

Vegetal like the spooligans?

Woo hoo we found life on another planet 4 billion beings, oh no, there all spooligans

Well, if you note the three articles I wrote in JEST, as they relate to NECKBEARDS AND Sup Forums, which obviously eluded you.

The spooligans are from uranus, you gonna date them?

What if cows were the inhabitants of another world that got trapped here and we've been barbequeing them for ages?

The way most science homo's are calling it any planet with a sembalance of decent temperature "supports life". Then some crackpot 1/2 ass website picks up the story and next everyone is saying "they found life on another planet!!" I say bs, til i see some multi-cell animal or plant. Not some bacteria or whatever, and none of this we found an amino acid and in 4 billion years this hell hole planet will support life, i say bs to that