Flat Earth Thread

>Flat Earth Thread

The shape of the Earth is flat and stationary, heliocentric globe-earth model was put into place and brainwashed into everyone through edjewcation to give place to nihilistic atheism by satanic freemasons.
The North pole is the magnetic center of the universe, a "small" universe ranging from the north pole center in circunference to a bit beyond the antartic ice wall. South pole doesn't exists.
The "universe" that you've been taught mostly doesn't exists. Earth is the only physical plane of existence. The stars are fixed lights in the sky and not suns at trillions of light-years as you've been told, and the "planets" are also stars but not with a fixed course (known as "wandering stars" to the ancients)
The sun and the moon orbit above the Earth, they are the same size just as we see them and not a mere coincidence of infinitely unlikely chance of a distance-to-size ratio. Moon is not terra-firma, is just a big light in the sky like the stars. It isn't a reflector of the sun, but gives light of its own.
Everything you've been feed from NASA is mostly a lie from start to finish, and its basic existence was to confirm the globe earth model for all as the reigning authority of knowledge. In reality, is just a photoshop factory of trillions of dollars in budget from your taxes.

>Post any more information you think relevant
>Feel free to ask.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=M-lT2EZJ69E
youtube.com/watch?v=LjvtmzbEgm8
youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
youtube.com/watch?v=Lx2mPKVsBE8
youtube.com/watch?v=Q-LE-jJQLTM
youtube.com/watch?v=95NDkABAsSk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Who made it ?

But who was phone?

...

...

>Everything you've been feed from NASA
Are you not aware that globes preceded NASA by centuries? You've picked the wrong villain.

...

P.S. What's the light source being reflected on the top of the dome?

You do know you're supposed to ignore idiots, niggers and feminists, right?

fuck off

Oops. My bad.

...

It's OK. Took me a while to get it.

...

Of course, it even preceds Galileo, but the debate and everyone's doubts were over only when you saw the footage of the globe Earth from the Apollo mision.
Till this day you're still being fed fake CGI imagery as pure irrefutable fact and evidence that the earth is a spining globe

That's not to say that NASA and the military don't have access to aircraft that can fly very high and take a photo through a circual window to a random cloud and say "see, this is the globe:"

...

...

In this image, nothing, that's just part of the random image I used for the thread.
But what actually is on the top of the dome is the star Polaris (the north star) which is totally fixed at the center of the north pole and all other stars circle around it

Stahp. Post Spiderman or bananas or something. Fuck even traps are OK. Who cares post anything that sucks or is awesome yet irrelevant.

...

How can stars circle it if they are fixed?

youtube.com/watch?v=M-lT2EZJ69E

ipersonallythinkthattheearthisflat!dou?!xoxo-grandma
ps.whereisthespacebar

...

Polaris is totally fixed in place.
The others are fixed in their orbits around polaris
The "planets" (venus, mars, etc) are not fixed and "wander"

...

Dude I went to the southpole

...

Been to northern Norway during 24 hour sunlight and went home to normal days, end of argument, literally nothing can explain changes of amount of daylight

Delicious bait.

What causes things to stick to the Earth?

If gravity then people in Australia would be pulled toward the center of mass of the disk, and would need to build everything at a near perpendicular angled to the ground with massive steel reinforcement to not "fall" to the north pole. If not gravity, then what force causes us to be accelerated to the ground and what causes this force?

If we are accelerating at a constant speed of 9.8 m/s/s upwards, what keeps the moon and sun spotlights above us? What causes the light from the sun and moon and stars if not gravitational fueled fusion amd reflection of such light int he case of the moon?

...

No you didn't

OK. :/

youtube.com/watch?v=LjvtmzbEgm8

...

uhhhh

We're not accelerating upwards.
Gravity doesn't exists, is just the joker card that heliocentrists invented centurys ago to explain basically everything that goes against common sense.
What causes things to stick to the Earth, then? That up is up, and down is down. Things fall that have a mass heavier than the air, fall. The sole exeption are the heavenly luminaires

so how does this prove the earth is flat ? lol literally it's proof against it, there's sun there and night elsewhere, if it were flat this wouldn't be possible

ATTENTION FLAT-EARTH THEORISTS

Using flight times, flight paths/distance, Vincenty's formulae and some math you can easily show that all flat-earth theory is troll science.

How you can be that stupid? Didnt you know that there are easy experiments to do to see that earth is spheric?

Yessssssss. This guy gets it

Can you explain me why it is day and night at the same time in different psrts if the earth is flat?

If gravity doesn't exist, why is it possible to build zero gravity rooms? How does a thrown ball not constantly travel in the trajectory it was thrown? Why do fat people have ankle problems? Jesus user, you caught the stupid

K

Why do things in a vacuum, that people can make pretty easily, fall at nearly identical speeds?

As in feathers and lead fall at the same speed in a rudimentary vacuum bell.

Also, what force or explanation keeps the "heavenly luminaries" suspended above the earth?

This bait is less tasty, a little more stupid, but has a certain something that makes me bite, like a tortilla chip.

Here's the deal: Flat Earthers are trolls. They can make shit up because truth is not their goal, and they end the arguments with "prove me wrong." By disavowing any science put forward and continuing to make shit up, they "win" by attrition. They aren't interested in critical thinking or putting in the requisite effort to do the science. There is simply no arguing. It's like trying to paint over mud. You just end up with a dirty brush. However, there do exist those who think this juvenile fantasy-speak of theirs is sensible and persuasive, because it convinced ... them. Yes, they're *that* stupid.

If the earth is flat, then why do the stars in the night sky look different depending on what hemisphere you are in? This makes no sense in the flat earth model.

Take your idiotic nonsense back to whatever conspiritard webshite you came from. This is too cancerous even for Sup Forums.

Because the sun is small (when compared to the gigantic sun of the heliocentric model). When the sun is above one point of the flat earth, it's light doesn't reach the part of the earth that are away from it. Think of the sun as a small spotlight at the top of the dome.
During the northern hemisphere summer solstice is when the sun is at it's closest point to the north pole, so in artic places the sun can be seen all 24hs.

>That's not to say that NASA and the military don't have access to aircraft that can fly very high and take a photo through a circual window to a random cloud and say "see, this is the globe:"

Pulled right out of your ass.

Because you're looking at them at different angles and perspectives, and some stars become visible as you get closer to them (ie: those fixed in the outher edges of the dome may not be seen when near the north pole)
If anything you should ask Why is Polaris visible from beneath the equator point, which should be completely impossible in if we're living in a ball, but totally plausible if we're living in a "disc",

>tfw youre a physics/chemistry major who understands that without earth having a spherical structure, gravity, as well as many of the empirically proven laws of physics, wouldn't make sense and neither would any easily observable planetary motions

dat geocities education fam

>When the sun is above one point of the flat earth, it's light doesn't reach the part of the earth that are away from it.

That means that as the Sun comes closer (overhead) and moves away, it will get brighter and dim with the square of the distance. But it doesn't.

Explain satellite TV. All satellite dishes of specific providers point to the same spot, if you follow where all those dishes point, there is no tower broadcasting signals. Where are the signals coming from?

You know that you can watch the earth on livestreamings from the international space stations dont you?

>Why is Polaris visible from beneath the equator point,

But it *isn't*, except for a couple of degrees due to atmospheric lensing (bending) of the Sun's rays. At least use real-life examples when you lie.

Why is anyone even responding to this?

Checked

OMG fuck off with this dumb shit. You're fucking retarded if you believe the earth is flat.

How you can explain you can fly from the patagonia to australia flying over the artantica in your stupid theory? Are all the comercial pilots lying?

Anonstronaut here. Space is real. Earth is a sphere. Science.

"Zero-G" planes do exist, it's just a mechanic of flight.

We don't know what keeps the luminaires in place, but may be something of the likes of magnetic levitation (on a mass scale)
youtube.com/watch?v=1gMMM62NC-4
About the fall speeds in a vacuum, put things of different weight together and they won't fall at the same speed. You should be asking, how does that proves gravity?

you're a special kind of stupid if you seriously believe that shit. Hero yourself now.

hey OP every single person or camera aboard a SR-71 or U-2 recon plane disagrees

That still doesn't explain why the stars look COMPLETELY different in the different hemispheres. And why they appear to rotate in different directions depending on your location.

Giving me a vague reference to "perspective" answers nothing.

Also your thing about polaris is a lie.

Trust me the numbers can add up if you want them too. But you can mount a private expedition of Antarctica. That's what the flat earthers don't want to believe. They hear the Antarctic treaty put an end to all that but its not true. You can fork up the cash to see for yourself the "edge of the world" and it's not the edge. I do believe NASA lies about a lot. But the deeper you delve into fact checking the flat earth claims and evidence the more it falls apart.

Oh they have an argument for that shit too, claiming the telemetry systems "fake it." Complete stupidity.

or even just those videos of things people put on helium balloons, like woody from toystory. Are those tax funded fakes as well?

this is poor bait, OP isnt actually intelligent enough to come up with decent rebuttals to actually stimulating questions. ive read cum roulette threads more stimulating than this

kys retard lmao, shitpost/10

How do people still believe the Earth is flat in 2016?

And for the conspiracy people, how the fuck does this benefit a government or organization in any way?

...

Yes. The entire world saw that earth is flat a couple years ago. How do you explain this? Red bull is lying too?

"Nasa is liars. I get all the true information from....."

Flat-Earther's literally have no source for the shit they claim to be true. They say it's flat, but they've never been to space or seen the "flat Earth". So where does all this bullshit come from? All the other flat-earther's....so must be true? I don't follow this logic.

> stationary
> flat
> heliocentric

Pick one before you bait for better trolling please.

Flat earth assumes that
>Someone created earth
>placed evidence that makes it appear to be a globe
Globe assumes
>laws and forces act as we observe them to
Occams razor says globe and OP is a fag

youtube.com/watch?v=Lx2mPKVsBE8

Antennas and cable. Have you ever wondered why if we have a million satellites in orbit we still need antenas everywhere and most communications are only possible through sea-floor cable connections? yeah.. because satellites are another tale.

Not much different from watching a stream of a space movie or videogame. CGI fakery from NASA, after all those trillions of dollars they may as well make it good.

You can't. In the flat earth model, there is no way to circumnavigate south-wise, since the south are the edges of the world. At the moment there is not one evidence of this ever happening.

>At the moment there is not one evidence of this ever happening.

At this moment there is not one evidence of "flat-earth".

>We don't know what keeps the luminaires in place, but may be something of the likes of magnetic levitation (on a mass scale)

Make shit up.

Here's the deal: Flat Earthers are trolls. They can make shit up because truth is not their goal, and they end the arguments with "prove me wrong." By disavowing any science put forward and continuing to make shit up, they "win" by attrition. They aren't interested in critical thinking or putting in the requisite effort to do the science. There is simply no arguing. It's like trying to paint over mud. You just end up with a dirty brush. However, there do exist those who think this juvenile fantasy-speak of theirs is sensible and persuasive, because it convinced ... them. Yes, they're *that* stupid.

Gps usees ~12 sats btw

Retards in tinfoil hats, everyone if them.

>They say it's flat, but they've never been to space or seen the "flat Earth".

I more than half think it's a ruse to get a flight to space. "I won't believe until I see it with my own eyes..."

...

explain sam the dog you massive faggot

youtube.com/watch?v=Q-LE-jJQLTM

That curvature is given because of "fish eye" camera lens. They give further distance of view, but distort the horizon by giving a curvature to everything in that distance.

Just look at that picture. You think you're seeing almost all of the US, but there isn't even sea at sight. That distance does not compell much more than the New Mexico desert from where he jumped.

>Antennas and cable.

Antennas and cable can acquire accurate data about the weather?

>most communications are only possible through sea-floor cable connections

*citation needed

>CGI fakery from NASA, after all those trillions of dollars they may as well make it good.

More shit you just made up.

>youtube.com/watch?v=Q-LE-jJQLTM
See
Also if you explain this video, then.
youtube.com/watch?v=95NDkABAsSk
The earth is flat. Curvatures in videos are given by lenses. Sometimes the curvatures even bend upwards

He can't even explain sam the dog

>if we have a million satellites in orbit

About 4,500 active. They do different things. Proving the Earth is nearly spherical is not a priority, as it's unnecessary for literally *all( practical purposes. You have no practical purpose.

>CGI fakery from NASA

There you go, picking on NASA again. You know, they're not really the ones promoting a globular Earth. They're putting that knowledge to good use. You on the other hand, are of no good use at all.

> At the moment there is not one evidence of this ever happening.

Only because you, as a liar, have the luxury of cherry-picking whichever "facts" you wish, and ignoring anything that would cause you to work at finding a real solution.

curvature that changes dynamically through filming?

>That curvature is given because of "fish eye" camera lens. They give further distance of view, but distort the horizon by giving a curvature to everything in that distance.

I'll give this one a check. The explanation fails, but it's true, you can create a curvature illusion with different lenses and angles. That said, you can't dismiss it out of hand.

i feel like flat earthers are paid retards and 12yr old copycats to ridicule other conspiracy theories.
noone with a functioning brain can think that...
fucking autists

Honestly the burden of proof is in you (or those who say that they did it) If you can provide irrefutable evidence that a circumnavegatron of the south was made, you destroy the flat earth model for ever and put all flat earthers to shame.

A fish eye lense would affect to the entire image and not only to the earths horizon. Pick another lie.

Thankyou, why are retards defending him, if it was a lens it would be the same level of distortion throughout.

two faggots with a ship mast proved you wrong 400 years ago. when you see a ship approaching on the horizon the first thing you see is the mast. you are literally so retarded people born 400 years ago are smarter than you

So I've heard this theory mentions there isn't Gravity in Flat Earth models, but the universe is in a constant state of upward motion, but i
haven't had anyone successfully explain how rain falls with a tear drop shape.

>The explanation fails, but it's true

So you admit that he's right, but it still fails because.. You say so.

Fucking brainwashed flat earthers. They make us believe by the media that the earth is flat but fail to see that it isnt

nihilistic atheism by satanic freemasons.
Are the atheist or satanic?

Consider this: this is Sup Forums. You can expect *anything* here. Personally, I think this is either a troll having a good laugh (it is pretty funny, to see us get worked up over what appears to be a mentally challenged individual's mental sputum), or it's a truly mentally-challenged individual who is working at full capacity to write the drivel we witness. Either way, somebody gets a laugh.

Also the most incoherent part, why has no hobbiest sailor found the edge? Before NASA and the lizard people came.

One question though, where did you find the info that the earth is actually flat? What makes you believe in it?