Truth or fiction? If so give your reasons

truth or fiction? If so give your reasons.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=HQgrs5c4iRU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righteous_Among_the_Nations#Number_of_awards_by_country
books.google.com.sg/books?id=lLaoQr-yhwYC&redir_esc=y
youtube.com/watch?v=5Vekf_2952U
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

true

My grandfather was one of them and i have a document from the french government proving he was deported from france to poland

Still he is alive somehow.

There still is no proof of mass gassings.

Truth until proven otherwise.

And not to mention there were no enough jews to die in those camps.

Not to mention after the war ended, they changed their theories of where the greatest death tolls took place.

Not to mention there was never a rebellion in a single camp.

...

Theres a teacup orbiting the sun.

True until proven otherwise.

Saved. The lack of basic physics and chemistry is just ridiculous with this whole thing.

Nigger, the holocaust has been substantiated. That has not.

I believe that there were but not as many deaths as they say. Mainly because I know how governments lie and how Jews exaggerate. History is always written by the victors. It can be very hard to cypher truth from fiction.

Theres really no physical evidence to support how many deaths are claimed. The official death toll has been changed more than 10 times and none of those changes required any substantiated evidence.

Because, of course, when you're being starved to death, rebellion and keeping notes are your main concern.

and you are wrong here,there were 3 rebellions, in Treblinka, Sobibór and in Aushwitz

Oh, of course.

...

Kek reverse image search shows that same picture attributed to dozens of different camps lmao

Watch some documents when you got the time. This fucking hypocritical claim of mass killing is pure bullshit. Even if it was true, Hitler isn't even close to the worst tyrant.

Much holocaust for muh double morals.

Really? Because all I'm seeing is Buchenwald. You're even lying to yourself.

Jasenovac. Even the nazis were horified when they saw it.
Also my great aunt got sent to a work camp in 42 and they did some experiments on her after which she was infertile.

truth, because hollywood told me so a few hundred times.

Civilize yourself. Don't let yourself to be fooled.

youtube.com/watch?v=HQgrs5c4iRU

Not an argument. The ashes are from Buchenwald.

Note that none of this actually demonstrates that nobody died at Auschwitz, nor does it disprove a deliberate extermination campaign on the part o the Nazis. Assuming all of these images and the accompanying descriptions are accurate (which is hard to say, we pretty much have to take it at OP's word that they're all properly contextualized), all it shows is that Auschwitz was somewhat different than the public perception.

Image macros so nobody can reverse search. How clever of you.

Jasenovac wasn't Nazi camp, but Ustashian, from what i know.

Do research if you are intetested. Some things must be seen with time.
It took me weeks to allow myself to ask myself the question "what if?"

I have literally just done that. The ashes are conclusively from Buchenwald, and they are of incinerated Jews.

What if you're wrong?

fiction.

there was a document.

On the other hand, you have yet to provide evidence that you saw the ashes were from "dozens" of concentration camps according to reverse search.

Fiction, technically. It's in the wording - it says 'people'.

>red pill
Kill yourself faggot

This.

Kikes and slavs are subhumans.

Don't worry, I have, numerous times. And the conclusion I come to is always the same: The Nazis, with the aid of foreign collaborators, engaged in a campaign of repression, forced relocation, and extermination of various ethnic, political, and religious groups including Jews, Poles, Slavs, Gypsies, communists, trade unionists, homosexuals, and Jehovah's Witnesses. I've examined numerous arguments that attempt to prove otherwise, but I haven't found a single one to be convincing.

Everyone can be wrong. People died is those camps, there is no point denying that.
There were also dozens of other cultures and nations in those camps and somehow jews are the ones who we are destined to feel sorry for.

Also it is illegal in european countries to disagree with holocaust, you may even be imprisoned for an opinion today.

It has been stated in this thread many times that allied forces caused the starvation by annihilating the supply lines etc. and some of those camps even were bomber by the allied planes.
It's not too hard to see that something is going on here.

Fiction; the number is uncannily a round number. Killed on the even million mark; get the fuck out of here.

>Poles
>Slavs

It didnt happen, even if it did. Why is Hitler always the one vilified? Stalin was a truely ruthless cunt, and I wouldnt even know who the fuck Chairman Mao is unless I didnt see his face on those gigantic banners.

>at the hands of the nazi murders

Truth or fiction, this is an incredibly assblasted way to write!

People believe what they want, for them the truth is obsolete. Why arent there national sadness for the other nationalities too? Why just for jews?

Tell me, why does the photo of the 'Auschwitz inmate soccer team' feature a soccer ball with the word 'England' written on it?

I posted that, not the guy youre replying to.

Because Hitler was the worst person to ever have existed?

There's a dick in your mouth right now.

True until proven otherwise

>Everyone can be wrong.

And you're wrong about the ashes. They are from Buchenwald.

>People died is those camps, there is no point denying that.

Good.

>There were also dozens of other cultures and nations in those camps and somehow jews are the ones who we are destined to feel sorry for.

Five million of which were soviets, gays, disabled peoples, political opponents, and six million of which were Jews. Of course they're the figurehead.

>Also it is illegal in european countries to disagree with holocaust, you may even be imprisoned for an opinion today.

Irrelevant to whether they happened or not.

>It has been stated in this thread many times that allied forces caused the starvation by annihilating the supply lines etc. and some of those camps even were bomber by the allied planes.

You're the first person to mention that.

>It's not too hard to see that something is going on here.

Yes, six million Jews were killed.

Dunno. Does it even matter?

What concentration camps did you see they were from? Once again, all the results I've got were Buchenwald.

Apologies then, see the thing I replied to.

Found the photo. That's an English team at a POW camp, not from Auschwitz.

Probably because the Jews were the largest group of victims.

So you think one group of people is over the other?
No wonder people are so brainwashed.

I dont even understand what this means. Sarcasm ?

>truth or fiction?

Germans murdering Eastern European civilians en masse?
-True.

Muh six gorrilions?
-False. Nowadays jews are even blaming Polish people for holocaust. Guys who risked their lives to hide and save jews (pic related) are now also the bad guys.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righteous_Among_the_Nations#Number_of_awards_by_country

>This video is not available in your country
I'm from Germany, what the fuck.

I pretty much lost my interest to have an argument on "muh six gorillions".
You havent studied for shit, it was told you on the junior grade.

fiction

The cencorship kicked in?
Youll find other videos "the truth about hitler", and the story they dont want you to know.

hahah, nice censorship there mate

Do some reading nigger.

books.google.com.sg/books?id=lLaoQr-yhwYC&redir_esc=y

No dipshit, don't put words in my mouth. The Holocaust was a tragedy for every group of victims, and they should all be recognized equally. But since the Jews were the largest group of victims, they're often given prominence over the others.

Viewed via proxy. It's basically the same shit the USA does for a hundred years now. I don't care about jews, niggers, muslims or russians or w/e. Washington urgently needs a nuke.

You say I should take it for granted from jewish author? No way that is one sided and stands purely on objective manner, right?

How very funny of you to inject YOUR biased perception onto a Jew such that you are incapable of viewing a Jewish author of writing an objective book.

How convenient, now you don't have to go through the trouble of reading the book and risk changing your worldview.

I've always wondered why hating A.H is politically correct. He didn't even kill too many. Look at Staling and he is almost revered as a hero.

>Look at Staling(?) and he is almost revered as a hero.

Is your view of the world that warped?

Revered? By whom? As far as I know, most people remember him as a mass murderer as well.

They are known to lie and twist things for their own gain and there are dozrens of cases where they have been caught for a holocaust lies. I can't believe I wasted so much time on you, like having a conversation with a lamb.
Your only source of intel is junior grade class propaganda books and nothing else.

Se Dr. David Duke. Look it up.

there wasn't even 4 millon people on the planet then

He is the only man who is looked at objectively. The documents about A.H make me laugh since no one is even trying to hide picking their sides.

>They are known to lie and twist things for their own gain

[citation needed]

>dozrens of cases where they have been caught for a holocaust lies

Let's see those cases.

>. I can't believe I wasted so much time on you

Not.

>like having a conversation with a lamb.

An.

>Your only source of intel is junior grade class propaganda books and nothing else.

Argument.

>propaganda

Prove it.

>Se Dr. David Duke. Look it up.

I know who he is, and I know he is entirely irrelevant to the book and discussion.

And he is objectively a mass murderer. The same as Shitler.

See the pattern here?

...

Fun fact: David Duke received his doctorate in history from the Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, a neo-Nazi degree mill in Ukraine which was stripped of its accreditation in 2006.

Still no one has made any effort to prove him wrong. They just scream their antisemitism like they knew nothing else.

I do, but I don't see why that means they're all liars.

Then look deeper. I know you can do it.

You wouldn't try to prove someone wrong when they said Africans flew down from space in pyramidal space ships. And people have proved him wrong. Multiple times.

>Look deeper and prove my point for me, because I sure can't, but I know you can do it.

I've been on Sup Forums since 2013, kid, and Sup Forums for a lot longer. I've seen every argument in the book and not one of them hasn't been proved wrong.

...

Fun fact: David Duke was convicted of felony tax fraud and mail fraud in 2002. He solicited donations from his supporters and blew the money on casinos.

Even if it's in front of you, you fail to see it. Jews run the majority of the media and they are in control.

>Look deeper and prove my point for me, because I sure can't, but I know you can do it.

There simply is no point to argue with people who already think they are right. Only source you've given me is a fucking jew written book and you expect me to swallow all of it.

youtube.com/watch?v=5Vekf_2952U

I'll just leave this here.

This is the plaque at Auschwitz during USSR rule. It was revised to 1.5 million as soon as the West retook control.

>being surprised Ruskies exaggerated the death toll to cover for their own mass killings

It's not valuable evidence against the Holocaust, there's lots more far more serious redpills to hand out.

>The Destruction Of European Jews by Raul (((Hilberg))) gives a total death toll of 5.1 million, with highs and lows of 4.9 to 5.4 million
>muh 6 million

Lots to unpack about that whole period. Jews were killed though, you should have no doubt about that.

You can't argue because you have no argument, and no youtube speech with graphs about debt and pictures of Germany is going to discount the Holocaust.

Can you make this any easier?

In your eyes nothing is enough. You have your clouded worldview and the fact you don't even look at the material brought to you and still believe in your own superiority, it only proves that some people are too stupid to look further.

I could say exactly the same thing to you.

>implying putting some wiki text underneath it makes your picture true...

Fucking idiot.

burden of proof, you dipshit

your claim, you prove it true :)

So? All that means is it was ash/bone, who cares which camp it came from?

In fact, I'd call that projecting on your part. I looked at your video enough to know it was a Hitler speech, and enough to see the debt figures cited, and enough to know it wasn't proof against the Holocaust. You, on the other hand, refuse to read critically acclaimed and historically sound non-fiction because of the identity of the author.

It is not the actual death toll of the Holocaust, the Red Cross has stated this.

...

>leftist faking evidence again

Funniest part is that he lied even about that. All results point to it being from Buchenwald.

If you wanted to make a believable fake, you could have put in a fucking full stop at the end of the sentence, and, you know, making the box the correct size?

You can have another go if you like.

Mad that Jews are better than You?

Prove the evidence is fake.

The mistrust towards jews is as old as the jewry itself. They were hated from the very days of great Rome because they deceived everyone in every turn. Assuming you've looked into it, you already know this.

I don't believe your so called source because it's politicallt correct. I wont let other people make decisions about right and wrong opinions.

You can not prove the Holocaust did happen.
We can not prove it didn't happen.

I chose to believe the first statement.

Only 4 million?
I learned in school that 6 million jews died. What gives?