What did she mean by this?

What did she mean by this?

...

...

Shes not wrong if we use the old definition of feminism

>listening to the political opinions of teenage actresses

>implying
Maybe shes on to something.

>>>/reddit/
>>>/9gag/

>teenage girl gets a platform to talk about something she doesn't understand
>people listen

She's also one of the morons that bought the "UKIP & FARAGE IZ BAD AND EVIL" meme

Nice meme good sir are you a fellow 9gager? XD.

Go to bed NIgel, you're drunk again.

CAN'T BARRAGE THE FARAGE

To some extent, I agree. If you don't think women in Islamic countries who can't go to school or run for office don't deserve better, you're a cunt. But women in developed, liberalized countries don't want equality, they just want a taste of the superiority men have enjoyed for millennia.

That's why he was elected as an MP right?

I agree, mudslimes aren't human

Well seeing as feminists claims to be for equality while preaching the opposite the idea may have some merit.

In under 20 years social justice issues have been reduced to vague fingerpointing and public posturing. This is the main reason why leftist parties aren't being voted in Europe right now.

The only people who are ready to take responsibility are right wing right now.

>call femenists sexist instead
well shit. I agree.

I can't wait until Game of Thrones ends and all these talentless actresses fade out of the spotlight.

Nope that was tactical voting, a gigantic smear campaign and both parties coming together to stop him winning

If you're a third party there's no fucking way you're going to succeed against that shit

That she's a child who has convinced herself that she has the world figured out, and is surrounded by adults who are afraid to tell her that she knows jack shit.

See also: Jaden Smith.

Except Jaden is clearly just taking the piss.

Masculinity is the only thing that's ever got anything done. But I think we're due for a change

But how else am I to sustain and nourish the rage-boner that I've allowed to become the defining feature of my psyche?

>adults who are afraid to tell her that she knows jack shit.

I'm sure they're childish SJWs who agree with her though

Reminding us why she has writers to tell her what to say.

Did they expect the actress to get hot?

...

Fuck it I'll bite

Kill yourself you leftist cunt

You're the reason our country is going to shit and girls are being raped on mass

>we should stop calling socialists socialists, and start calling anyone who isn't socialist a fascist

>we should stop calling Christians Christians, and start calling people who aren't Christian immoral satanists

Etc. etc.

It's literally the exact same thing. She's literally advocating brainwashing.

>on mass

Typical quasi-literate UKIP voter.

kek

>literally advocating brainwashing

jesus calm down m8

>we should stop calling socialists socialists, and start calling anyone who isn't socialist a fascist

This is literally true tho.

I take a strange solace knowing people who are half my age and 4 times as dumb as me are not only rich and successful but have a forum and fans with which they can spread their nonsensical fantasy opinions.

>read 1984
>didn't get why the filthy plebs were complaining about their benevolent government

>anyone understands sexism/gender issues

it's literally just different people mouthing off about how they feel about things at this point. Maisie is entirely qualified by the current standards of the discussion. That applies to Sup Forums's anti-SJW brigade as well.

Ask her "what about sexist feminists?" and watch her brain shut down

>noted psychologist and neurologist George Orwell

Just FYI m8 the doxastic power of newspeak is founded on a concept known as linguistic determinism, also called the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which claims that vocabulary strongly informs capacity for thought. Linguistics ain't the hardest of sciences but this theory (in the strong form you require for it to be worth worrying about) is about as debunked as they come. Language is generative, newspeak just wouldn't ever work as depicted. Would take ages to explain but the tl;dr is that you could never stop people saying 'doubleplusgood' sarcastically and so on, and that capacity (which is innate) undermines the desired outcome.

She'd probably start talking about power structures and so on.

As has been said, using the classical definition of feminism shes probably right.

What i find more stupid was her point about not labelling her sexuality, which is code for "i fuck girls but dont want to call myself bi or lesbian"

Go back to your tower, you talentless child

Fucking sick of this bitch being shit in everything

Don't waste your time with a thought out response containing facts and theory on Sup Forums of all boards.

We should stop calling Maisie 'normal' and just start calling her 'Fetal Alcohol Girl'. Then everyone else is just normal.

You are either a normal person or you have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. People get a label when their mother drank heavily while they were in the womb.

Well we know you're wrong from our own experience.

For fucks sake: the Internet is a classic example example of people saying things "sarcastically" over and over again until they forget that they're being sarcastic and start to believe the words they're saying.

Also, nice dodge. Nothing in your posts refutes my point. Big words are not a substitute for an arguement.

>theory
Yes

>facts
where?

>we know you're wrong from anecdotal data
>also it doesn't matter because this somehow doesn't refute the underlying hypothesis of everything i've been saying

Well OK then.

Well if you want to google either 'linguistic determinism' or 'Sapir-Whorf' (no guarantees I spelled the second one exactly right) then you'll see at least I'm not making them up.

But I know reading is apt to give you a headache. You could probably do with a soma-holiday and a trip to the feelies.

>Superiority

You mean supposed superiority where you kill your dreams to put food on the table, food you can't even stomach because you have to look at that jaded shrew you married. Oh yeah, THAT superiority.

1. The point was that she's advocating manipulating language to change opinions and connotations. Your response was that 1984 could never happen (even though we're already seeing it happen with groups changing the definition of racism). That was not my point. Attacking a point that I never made is called a straw man, but apparently you can't google either.

2. You haven't show any facts. Nothing but theory and opinion.

>they just want a taste of the superiority men have enjoyed for millennia.
They even want what men have had, they want better than that.

Sure, men have had more power when it came to families or to the workplace, but they've also had more responsibility, had to die in wars, risked their lives in trades and construction, etc.

Women want the power that men had, without the responsibilities. They want their cake and to eat it too.

You can fuck off to /r/gameofthrones kiddo.

Typical cuck, I hope your mum gets culturally enriched

>The point was that she's advocating manipulating language to change opinions and connotations.

Yeah, and I was explaining that that's not really a thing. You invoked 1984 in a manner suggesting it was some ultimately authoritative depiction of that happening, and I explained that it's merely fiction and that the theories underlying it are long discredited.

Get as asspained as you like about it, mate, I could use a giggle. Point is that reaching for the epsom salts and fanning yourself over LITERALLY ADVOCATING BRAINWASHING is a bit silly, and I generally recommend people not to be silly, if they can at all avoid it. But suit yourself.

The term you are looking for Maisie is Heretic

Its ok guys, if we become truly equal in maybe milion years we wont be shunned for hitting women back, what time to be alive!

that's kind of a risky investment when dealing with british kids

So, according to you, these two scenarios would produce the same results:

1. A world where feminism is presented as an ideology that advocates women's rights and equality (among other things).

2. A world where feminism is tought as being the ONLY ideology that promotes those things, and where disagreeing with that ideology over any means you are labeled as a sexist.

Yeah, I'm the idiot here. Print those two text books, and give one to one society, and the other one to another society and pretend that #1 isn't going to be more open minded than #2.

You can fap to yourself over your bombastic language (seriously, for someone who claims you can't manipulate people with rhetoric, you seem to be trying pretty hard to do just that {I'll throw around as many big words and terms as I can,banking on the fact that people won't know what they are and assume it's relevant, and therefore that I'm smart!}), but those of us living in the real world, we're going to try be a bit more practical.

Honestly, it feels like you're the kind of person who lives to here himself talk, and if it's all the same, I'd rather not enable that kind of self-indulgent behavior. Now, you're going to pretend you're not red in the face, which is fine. When dealing with people like you on the Internet, the only way to get you to stop screaming is to let you save face, so I'm going to do that. Enjoy arguing with space.

That gamble paid off pretty well for Harry Potter. I can see why people are making that mistake.

Except whether you believe Newspeak is a thing or not, these people certainly do.

>A world where feminism is presented as an ideology
>A world where feminism is tought as being the ONLY ideology

I didn't bother reading the rest, because this is hilarious. What I've done is show you that THE MEANS BY WHICH you propose that feminism is being 'taught as the only ideology' is illusory and wouldn't work if tried. Everything else is just you not wanting to be wrong on the internet.

A lot of New Age types believe in magic, should I start screaming hysterically about LITERALLY ADVOCATING BLACK MAGIC, do you think? Or should I ignore it?

We should stop calling feminists "feminists" and just start calling people who aren't feminists "normal persons" and then everyone else is just a cunt.

You're either a normal person or a cunt. People get a label when they're feminists.

all memeing aside, she's actually getting kinda cute...

Nice spelling faggot.

See the problem with that is that you can say feminism is about equality of the sexes all you want, but this is just not the case in practice. In practice, feminism is a civil rights movement (or a bunch of them, really), and being a feminist or not is about whether you agree with the agenda of that movement, and not about your opinion of women.

Claiming that people who reject the label of feminism are sexist, that feminism is the only group that wants to improve gender inequality or that modern feminism deserves credibility based on what other people did decades ago, is intellectual dishonesty at its finest.

...

...

More that the "issue" is so simple even a child understands it, while an "adult" (virgin) man cannot

>sexists aren't even human

SJWs are fucking nuts

Did you molest the family dog when you were young. Because dogs are all I see when I see anglo women.

Be honest, UKIP cannot win in a country that elects muslim mayors for their capital city

It's over my friend

Oh God a talking Goblin!

>This is the main reason why leftist parties aren't being voted in Europe right now.
Kek.
Austria literally just elected a lefty over the right wing alternative.

People who think they are better than others based on birthright rather than accomplishments are less than human, yes

dumb fredposter

I'm an egalitarian, not a feminist. Does that make me sexist according to this brat?

It means you need to sniff her socks

either brexit happens and ukip has achieved their main goal

or

brexit fails and there is a huge surge in ukip support from everyone that voted out

win win for nige

well I mean, if she insists

hnng

>millions of people in the British Isles died for this
women are literally too dumb to have the right to vote

I want to be her toilet for the rest of my life

>i think auschwitz would have been fine if there'd been a demographically proportionate number of jewish guards
>anyone objecting to that is manifestly unreasonable

>millions of people in the British Isles died for this

What?

>People get a label when they're bad
>"Jew" is a label

It checks out.

>We should stop calling autists autists, and start calling non-autists normies.

>these are the same kind of people who scream "BIGOT!!" when you disagree with them