*proceeds to act out of character and murder with complete disregard for human life*

*proceeds to act out of character and murder with complete disregard for human life*

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=psVIG7YvdjM
twitter.com/AnonBabble

those are fucking criminals with armed guns and with any moment could kill him.
he needs to take them out fast and quick and not waste time subduing them.
it might've worked in his earlier years, upholding the no kill rule with smaller thugs but these mercenaries are well armed and trained.

world's greatest detective easily deceived by trail of clues

>brands criminals like cattle for slaughter in the penal system

Sotry. Couldn't get past this. It's so stupid and completely unravels under the slightest scrutiny. I will bet anyone money that it won't be in the solo films.

ALLAH WILLS IT

No shit it won't because he stops doing it at the end of this movie.

whats so stupid about that exactly?
the guy was a fucking pedophile and a human sex trafficker.
if you believe he deserves to live you're a fucking subhuman and a cuck

London's waking up

It's because after Robin was killed, he decided no more half measures. That doesn't mean he's a murdering psychopath, but he's not going out of his way to not kill people anymore.

That's what i got out of it at least.

>tfw marvelfag tries to understand batman

>those are fucking criminals
So is he. Killing makes him no better than the criminals he kills. He's not even a vigilante, he's just a murderer.

Plus he isn't the first Batman to kill. Keaton was a grinning lunatic. At least this movie does a few things badass with it instead of just... throwing it in there because why not (back then faux nerds weren't a thing so no one picked this shit apart like a bunch of fucking apes. Even the geeks just thought "heh I like Keaton").

>tfw DCucks don't even understand their own characters

>IF YOU KILL THEM YOU'LL BE JUST AS BAD
Fuck off

>their
Stop that. Batman is an American icon that transcends your gay little console company wars.

That's pretty much Batman's entire creed, Zack. Sorry your edgy, try-hard version didn't work out.

>Batman is an American icon
He's a fictional faggot in a cape in children's books. Grow up.

go back to watching inconsequential popcorn flicks you filthy casual pleb
Your money is gone,you won't get it back no matter how many times you repost the same pointless argument.

...

I hope he murders joker killing joke style in the trilogy they're doing.

And just end the dceu off that

...

For fuck sake, Nolan Fags do not understand Batman. He has killed criminals literally since his first issue. Nolan is a try hard autist who gave him a no kill code so he would have a counterpoint to the Joker. He kills like 50 Ninjas in Begins and even a few people in TDK. Remember when he slammed that dump truck into the the roof of the tunnel with the tumbler? Those guys aren't going home. Fuck off and watch Marvel movies while gasping for air in between mouthfuls of Nolan cock. Faggots.

The no kill rule is a mockery to the freedom fighters overseas. Murder sometimes is the only answer in war against criminals.


So what batman is doing is justified.

>meme image

>implying DC fans wear caps so that you inadvertently become bald.
>we are cape-men

>We're criminals, we always were.

How dumb are you fucking cucks.

The move is about a Batman that has fallen to moral decay after 20 years on the job, having lost those close to him, and endured so much pain and for what? For crime to just come back again and again like a weed, and then faced with the existence of the Superman, this person who 1) has the capability to make his entire lifes work be meaningless while at the same time 2) potentially being the biggest threat mankind has ever faced, and making it his mission to stop him before he has a chance to do what he fears is possible.

Batman in this film is broken morally. His judgement broken, he no longer sees the weeds as worth saving. He isn't murdering them, but isn't going out of his way to NOT step on the weeds.

It's literally the most meaningful deconstruction of the character there could ever be TODAY. The Batman that never kills is a fool's fantasy, a trope that has no place in an adult work. Batman has to break. He must, a believable character doing what Batman does WILL break. But in the end he is rebuilt.

A Batman who has descended into the abyss, and crawled out through his eyes opening to the virtue and goodness of Superman...imagine the good he can now do, free from the shackles of doubt, enlightened to the power of good within men, after his long war on crime. Good men can falter, but they can rebuild. They have to.

Sorry if this comes off as messy, but it needed posting.

You're assuming the new Batman trilogy won't be prequels.

THe problem with him murdering everyone so blatantly is how do you justify him letting the Joker live?

Dude killed your little butt buddy and (maybe) crippled Batgirl.

There's really no reason why Joker is still alive in this universe. Or any of his villains to be honest.

Well said, user

Synder didn't sell this angle convincingly enough desu mate. But thanks for your post even if you called us cucks

>kills everyone except for lex

It's a beautiful post, user.

Yeah and

>Martha

Lol OK we BFFs now

Zack Snyder is a giant festering tumor on the ass film making. Please ban him from ever making a film again.

>psychological ideas are too silly for Marvel babies
I'm guessing you have a Tom Holland poster on your wall already.

>Not getting that he was an older broken Batman and by the end of the film he found himself again.

>Implying Batman as a character isn't psychologically broken due to the death of his parents.

Bruce being triggered to coherence through the Martha moment is literally the most DC comic book thing ever filmed. It's unbridled and un-cynical emotion based on 75 years of history. That Superman and Batman come to terms with each other and that Batman finally comes to see the humanity in Superman after being triggered into reliving his mother's death and realizing he has become what he has hated...it's clear that Snyder and Terrio understand the character of Batman far more than you ever will.

I just don't like how they did Clark. He's entirely at odds with how people perceive him to the point where he becomes completely disillusioned and runs off AGAIN (we saw this in MoS).

He threatens the fuck out of Batman and smashes up his car. Then he threatens the fuck out of Lex and never talks to Batman about the situation about Diane Lane's sweet elderly ass about to get capped. He never truly feels heroic in the classical sense. He's not inspiring

The whole redemption of Batman is what Synder was going for hence the dialog at the end between Bruce and Diana and the constant Christ imagery but it just never feels authentic due to how Superman comes across in his own pseudo sequel.

75 years?! Eeewwwww
Hey user, remember that reeeaaallly oooold movie, The Empire Strikes Back?

youtube.com/watch?v=psVIG7YvdjM

I bet you're a pussy in real life.

>it's a "DCucks circle jerk each other while injecting a bunch of themes and symbolism that isn't there" episode

This show is dead. Bury it.

>acts out of character

OP confirmed for faggot who can't read

The film is as much a deconstruction of The Superman and the rebuilding at the end.

I feel the lack of coherence is due to the missing 30 minutes, which clearly contain a significant amount of Clark Kent scenes. Batman's arc works because we aren't really missing any part of his story.

That's how I feel at least, we'll see in July.

He did it better for a helluva lot cheaper decades ago.

The symolism is there, it's just that hamfisting symbolism into a movie doesn't make it good or better in any way.

It's because DC forced this pre-JL movie shit. We should've had a Man of Tomorrow focusing on Superman vs Lex in an ideological battle for the future of humanity.

BvS wasn't a terrible movie but it was trying to do too much.

Sup Forums is a place for discussion, you reddit fuck. Crazy, right? Just because there's no censorship here doesn't change the fact that this isn't your Le Wacky Anonymous Shitposting Board.

>act out of character

>it's a "self hating DCucks get defensive over their lack of taste" episode

A rerun again?

youtube.com/watch?v=psVIG7YvdjM

>movie is based on dark knight returns
>out of character for batman to be acting like one of the most brutal versions of the character
The whole point of that comic was he's an old batman, he's lost a lot of his strength so he can't just subdue them without lethal force. And even if that wasn't the case, the murder of robin changed batman and made him realize the only way to permanently stop true evil is to put it in the ground.

He only murders 4 people;

-grannade trio and airplane guy.

All the car guys survived by fiction rules

>thing I don't like is reddit

>he's lost a lot of his strength so he can't just subdue them without lethal force.

Dude was literally the Arkham Games Batman in live action form

What's his name again?

That comic isn't even a part of the official DC canon. It was just a one-off which was then entirely ignored by the main Batman storyline. It wasn't a bad idea developing it into a movie. It was a bad idea to try to build your entire expanded universe around it, though.

They needed something to differentiate themselves from
>Nolan Bats
>MCU

A gritty old Batman that needs to be inspired by a Superman who is also kinda gritty and 34 years old is what they came up with. Also insert jarring post apocalyptic scenes that sort of show Batman was right all along. B R A V O N O L A N

Wow, I haven't been on Sup Forums for months and there's still a BvS thread constantly on the front page.

Wow, you're pretty autistic aren't you?

Fuck Batman. He shouldn't have even been in the movie.

And he wasn't unique or popular until he stopped shooting people

Yet we disregard how the original Detective Comics of Batman were actually intended to be.

Dark and gritty. Originally Batman did murder people and he was a vigilante. He only adopted the more family-friendly "no guns" policy when they released Batman: The Animated Series for kids after the Tim Burton movie dropped.

Same thing applies to TMNT. They used to kill people and were trained by Splinter to extract revenge on Oroko Saki (The Shredder).

Would you left wing cucks fuck off? Criminals are subhuman filth. Batman is correct in crushing them like cockroaches

That is from the fucking 40's and ignores decades of character development and refinement. You fucking prat.

No. Arkham batman, followed the no kill rule with the exception of the joker who usually ends up getting killed by batman. Also he didn't actually kill him he just chooses to save himself instead of him. Batfleck ran around killing people like it was nothing. Dude had fucking Gatling guns on his batmobile, and blew that one dude up. He even tried to fucking murder superman in cold blood, he didn't just want to kick his ass, and almost succeeded but had a change of heart.

>Arkham Batman
>Killing Joker

Joker literally kills himself by juicing up with Venom/Titan and then stabbing Batman when he had the cure in his hand. He's a fucking idiot.

>Implying not one of those thousands of thugs died from life threatening injuries sustained by Batman mercilessly beating them and breaking every bone in their body.

Easy to ignore and hide consequences

>another movie fag whos never picked up a comic tries to bait the autistics into a debate even though his mind is already completely made up on being a human pile of shit

wew lad

That's al good and all. However Snyder came out and says he tried to make it so Batman killed by proxy.

[Citation needed]

wasn't that hommage of Darkknight returns which is masterpiece

If Batman is so rich why can't he build an asylum that actually keeps villains in?

The problem with Batman vs. Superman isn't that Batman kills. It's that the collateral damage caused by a "superman" who literally does not give a flying fuck about civilian casualties is cited as the reason to kill him by two other characters who themselves are also casual murderers. It does not make sense.

Cue buttblasted Snyder apologist.

Almost none of this comes across in the actual fucking movie. This is all background information you've carried with you since better writers ingrained it into your skull back in the 80s. You are doing Snyder's work for him. It sure as fuck wasn't in the movie he made.

*brands people that would have died in prison anyway for being pedophiles*
le death sentence

Miller's Batman is overrated garbage and shouldn't be the reference for any film.

>Sorry if this comes off as messy

It's a beautiful mess.

I don't even mind Batman killing people. What I do mind is that he mows them down with miniguns.
Also, why would people in prison kill dudes that were branded by Batman? Wouldn't that be more like a badge of honor among criminals?

>le just as bad as them if you kill meme

hahahaha
marvelcucks literally want cartoons on screen

It's probably a situation where he only brands really fucked up criminals, pedophile, serial killers, etc. Prisoners don't take kindly to pedophiles.

I could understand the pedophile thing. But the people he branded were all related to human trafficking.
Not to mention serial killers are not really looked down upon in Gotham, considering people like Zasz or Two-Face enjoy a certain respect from their inmates.
Or the fact that the Joker came out of prison alive time and time again

Honestly, the film touches really lightly upon this subject, so everything is basically speculation.

This is a fairly new thing, and he has only branded a pedophile and a trafficker so far.

And Two-Face and Joker are basically crimelords, no inmates would fuck with a crimelord. Joker and Zsasz are in Arkham Asylum anyway, not a prison.