So what's the story on this guy who is he and what did he do? (britfag here)

So what's the story on this guy who is he and what did he do? (britfag here)
Being serious just a brief outline.

Other urls found in this thread:

distractify.com/news/2016/09/04/brock-turner-armed-protestors?whm&lc_content_id=Zgx0Rlp60
paloaltoonline.com/media/reports/1465602924.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Guy raped a drunk girl, got away with it

He took a blackout drunk girl into an alley and fingered her, she passed out and so he started dry humping her until some passing bikers caught him and took him down and he was charged with rape. Judge went easy on him because he thought he'd suffered enough/learned his lesson etc., etc. and victim went on an SJW tirade that took the internet by storm for 10 minutes.

/end

>dude was a total creeper on some girl
>she constantly tried to distance herself from him
>she gets shitfaced at a party and passes out outside
>Turner decides that would be a good time to fingerbang her
>gets caught fingering her
>charged with sexual assault
>yet the dumbass judge only gave him a few months in prison

>dude was a total creeper on some girl
>she constantly tried to distance herself from him

These parts are made up.

He was a feminist sacrifice to let everyone know he is a white male rapist even though he only fingered a girl.
>hees uh gud boi didnu nuffin

Spoiled prodigal son rapes passed-out drunk behind a dumpster, becomes face of "male dominated white privilege" when given virtuallyt no sentence. Now that he's out, ....
distractify.com/news/2016/09/04/brock-turner-armed-protestors?whm&lc_content_id=Zgx0Rlp60

good try, faggot. here's an MIP form from the case
paloaltoonline.com/media/reports/1465602924.pdf

She doesn't even remember it, she shouldn't be able to rant

Yeah that was the narrative that she made up later. She was blacked the fuck out.

Surprisingly his account of earlier in the evening is totally different, and was given immediately after the events occurred.

STRANGE, HMM?

dude, whether they were hitting it off initially or she was creeped out by him, it doesn't really change the fact that he assaulted a passed out girl behind a fucking dumpster with zero permission

I'm not defending his actions, merely pointing out that they're trying to make him look as bad as possible without regard for what actually happened.

I'm not interested in angles, or agendas, I'm interested in facts.

>He fingered a girl who was pass out drunk in a parking lot.
>He says she consented.
>She says she can't remember.
>Two dudes find him fingering her and threaten to kick his ass and he runs away.
>Feminist professor at his college finds out and decides the case can further her career and it turns into a SJW shit show.
>Dude gets 3 months in jail because it was his first offense and because he didn't penetrate her.
>SJWs freak out and further the shit show by getting people who know nothing worked up over the fact that a rich white boy "raped" a girl and only got three months.
>No one actually discusses the particulars of the case because its an awkward topic and any defense of dude gets your branded a rapist sympathizer.

the story was corroborated by others who knew them, since they had many friends in common. and no, it's not strange that the rapist would try to lie. im sorry you had to hear this from me, but your gud boi isnt actually a gud boi

And the fact is, the fucker still got less time than he deserved.

>oh yeah it totally happened that way
>he's a monster!

Do you not see what a humongous tumblr dupe you are?

well done

>disregards eyewitness testimony
>"interested in facts"
k

>ITT: "SJWs are against thing therefore I must be for thing"

Eu law student here

What is wrong with this story is not that the guy got like 6 months of with only 3 effective months.
What is wrong is that everyone seems to think an heavy sentence is somehow going to repair the harm he's done. Is the girl supposed to feel better if he gets a 20 year sentence? Call him barbarian

The kind that's not admissible in court you mean?

Also, link to said "testimonies."

A top #lad was after some muff and some pissed slag ended up shagging him then regretted in the morning after and told the rozzers because she couldn't handle the bantz.

In her letter to the court she admitted they didn't know each other and in fact it was one of the most quoted parts of the whole thing so please kys

>people find him raping a girl
>he runs away
>multiple eyewitnesses say that he had been creeping on her for several weeks
>his only defense is that the clearly unconscious woman somehow agreed to get fingered behind a dumpster
>and on top of all this, he got convicted. which means a jury that had access to all the facts believe he did it
yeah. im the dupe.

>creeping on her for weeks

Wow, got any more made up shit you want to propagate about this case? Jesus christ.

See

gonna need a source on that one. and even if were true, he's still a rapist, dumbass

She feels bad not because of what happened, but because of what she thinks she should feel about what happened.

Theres a high degree of overblowing any criminal action a man might commit against a woman.

If the victim of this crime got drunk, went to a party, and shoved her hand down some guys pants who was passed out, how long would she spend in gaol?

>All guys love it! It's okay. I just wanted to see what it felt like

You know its true. Theres a double standard.

He got a low sentence because theres no evidence of any wrongdoing. He MIGHT have thought his actions were okay. He was drunk as fuck as well!

But oh no. If women get drunk, drunk men need to protect them. Or something.

So basically he got caught fucking a passed out girl behind a bin.

Why the fuck did the judge go easy though? swimming talent does not stop future rape.

He didn't fuck her, he fingered her.

I can already tell you've bought into the media narrative though so don't bother looking for a debate with me.

>triggered because some michael cera looking faggot is a rapist

Who hasn't fingerblasted a drunk slapper in their time? It's just a normal thing lads do tbqph.

Agree with that, though behing drunk isn't an excuse to take advantage of an unconscious individual.

My point is sjw's freak out about a 3 month sentence as if the sentence could in any way repair the harm. It doesn't, there's no point in locking him up for years

He's not the one ranting about how a drunken fumble is the ultimate crime

>hurr durr ur triggered
>lol u mad
>i trole u

So you admit that you're a lying tumblr shill

sexual assault is defined as unwanted sexual penetration. but dont let facts get in the way of your dreams

Yeah but you said fucked and that's different from fingered
>Not the user you replied to

ZOMG RAPE CULTURE
PATRIARCHY
OPPRESSION OPPRESSION

Did you say he sexually assaulted her? No, you said he fucked her you fucking semantics flogging keyboard warrior. Keep your story straight or just shut your fucking mouth.

>inb4 hurr u mad I trole u

don't even waste your energy you will not get another reply out of me

>never said it was some ultimate crime, lol. just that he raped her.

Sexual Assault =/= rape
>Depending on where you live

But when you're drunk you're less inhibited. You're less likely to understand that something is a bad or good idea, more likely to under-estimate risks..

It's really just an argument that people shouldn't be allowed to drink.

Should we really treat fingering an unconscious woman less severe than sticking his dick in her?

Same shit, different body part.

>gets hung up on semantics
>expects actual debate regarding the moral issues behind sexual assault cases

Nigga kill yourself

>Dude fucked a drink chick at a party
>chicks parents got mad
>made girl say it was rape
>judge saw through the bulshit so have kid minimal time

You are correct sir, there should be no penalty either way.

I mean, I guess putting away a murderer doesn't bring back the murdered either. You have an odd idea of how criminal justice should work. Pardon me if I don't believe you're a lawyer.

I fail to see how fingering some chick while shes passed out on the ground behind a dumpster is the same as taking some girl home from a party.

>doesnt think putting fingers inside a vag is sexual intercourse
did you just now learn that fingerbanging is a thing? not surprised you're running from the thread

...

>falling for the story

It's why you're not a judge

You're the reason SJWs get triggered by this shit

Actually, from what I've seen, the most reasonable complaint I've heard is about consistency in sentencing. The complaint is that he got off easy compared to, say, a black male performing the same act.

Just doing my part. What have you done latley?

>implying becoming some random judge is actually hard
>implying a judge's word is the end all be all

Bud I think you've got shit for brains

Nah I was just saying. Just been lurking this thread to see the different perspectives
I wasn't hung up, I just wanted to clarify that there is a slight difference between full on rape and fingering a chick while you are drunk as fuck and she is passed out. Not saying it's right, just that there is a slight difference. People shouldn't be getting drunk in the first place, usually nothing but bad things come from it. Also, I don't want a debate, I'm tired and would rather just read other user's opinions from here on out. Feel free to respond however you like though, preferably constructively.

I took a shit a few minutes ago, that was pretty nice, thanks for asking.

The reason they hit the gavel at the end is to symbolize case closed. For the boy it is over. Go be butthurt somewhere else.

Behing "less inhibited" and not understanding you're committing a felony are two totally different things

This is it though I'm OP
I see this dopey ass face all over the place with no explination of what he did
So I'm only going on what I've read.
So he Fingered her then
She was still passed out though
Shady as fuck
Is he on the sex offenders register now then?
And what will he have to do now he is?

My whole hangup on the "they were drunk therefore rape" thing is what if you commit a crime while absolutely plastered to the point you literally remember none of it? Are you not responsible for your actions while drunk to that extent? How far does being drunk protect you from responsibility?

A murderer is likely to murder again and is therefore removed from the public. You hear stories all the time about a wife or GF murdering their abusive partner because they saw it as "the only way out" and get off relatively easy.

Brock Turner is extremely unlikely to offend again, especially considering he's a registered sex offender, will probably be barred from any campus he attempts to set foot on, and will probably kill himself in all honesty.

Modern lawyers and criminologists mostly reject the idea that sentencing has any deterrent effect. I'm not saying fingering an inconscious girl is ok, I'm saying there's no point in locking the guy in jail for years

you made most of that up
>the two guys caught him
>he was arrested and charged at the scene
>there was a public outcry
>just because you dont know shit does not mean that the case was not discussed
stop being a faggot

OK, after this explanation I'll agree with you that there is a difference in a literal sense. However, and I think this is fairly commonly agreed upon, I'd say that the fact that he or she is drunk is not an acceptable defense for his actions, and is not a get-out-of-jail free card. If you kill somebody while you're drunk, it's still murder. If you steal something while you're drunk, it's still theft.

While there is certainly an argument to be made that people shouldn't be drinking, I don't think that's a terribly constructive way to approach this. You have to accept that people do get drunk and laws need to accommodate for that.

It's kind of like your presidential elections
I know the candidates
(Old mother Hubbard and daterape mccombover)
But other than that there's no info on the things they stand for etc

I didn't even know Obama was black until his third year.

That is a legitimate complaint. Men do get heavier sentences that women, and black men especially

>I'm not defending his actions,
No, you are blind and butthurt to anything that could hurt your little rape-boi.
Fucking pedo - go to a clan meeting or something.

You are aware that the entire purpose of a huge amount of our justice system is to discuss the results of cases and whether or not they were the correct decision, right?

...

Nobody said you couldn't actually use your brain and look shit up yourself.
Fucking biased fool.

Why not get every crime down to 2 days then?
Dumbass.

Checked and also I agree

Like I said. That was the most reasonable I've heard. He didn't get the minimum sentencing for that, but a black dude will get 20 years for weed.
Granted, you don't fix people being shafted in sentencing by sentencing others more harshly. Women need the same sentencing, and we really need to evaluate the comparative sentencing for drugs vs rape.

It all comes down to a system solely reliant on biased individuals to decide the duration/severity, and that doesn't really seem reasonable to me.

>>people find him raping a girl
>>he runs away
Isn't that enough get every other person in the world, that isn't a oh-so-important athlete in prison for more than a month?!
/Thread

the stupid bitch went to a college party she didn't even attend and got pissed drunk and gotten taken advantage of. Has a boyfriend too, he should leave the slut

>A murderer is likely to murder again
They have a 10% reoffense rate.

>Brock Turner is extremely unlikely to offend again
24% chance of reoffending in the next 25 years.

I need to take swimming lessons so I can rape girls.
Now that's a win-win situation.

Welcome to douche land, where every rapist thinks everybody else is a rapist.
hint: You're a rapist.

Brock Turner got banned from swimming though.

Do you want to drown?

Many academics all other the world suggest reducing jail sentences to a minimum actually. It is proven that sentences have no preventive or deterrent effect, and you are a fucking primitive if vengence makes you feel any better. So yeah, prison should be abolished except for those who are likely to backslide. And those should be healed in prison, not kept in cage like mad animals

Yes, but this would more honestly be like charging someone with premeditated murder for getting drunk and fighting some other drunk guy who fell over, cracked his head and didn't even die.

Yes because my fingers dont have cum coming out of em

It has been proven? I don't think that is the case. There is probably evidence SUGGESTING that it doesn't have an effect, but it almost certainly hasn't been proven.

What the fuck, user? There is something seriously wrong with you. Go have a doctor check that out.

To be fair the american criminal justice system cannot seem reasonnable to anyone who tries to understand it

What's it like to still be a virgin?

I have a huge biker gang in my neighborhood I'm sure they will love you (quite literally).
Also, quit reading Foucault.

>American legal justice system
Shit, at least we have innocent until proven guilty. Frenchies need to step the fuck up.

Yeah that's what I meant, english isn't my first langage but you got my point. Most evidence suggest sentencing has no preventive or deterrent effect except for minor offences such as speeding

I mean really though
Look at his face
That's got sex offender written all over it
He knows what he did
And he'll do it again
Guaranteed.

Oh, look at the 12 year old virgin.

No, this would be like charging someone with murder in the second degree for a drunk person killing another drunk person because they got into a bar fight.

Well, i get 1½ years chopped of a sentence, fingering a twelve year old have never been that cheap.
I still say go.

>Found a passed out girl.
>Took some pics to send ti his bros
>Raped her behind a dumpster
>Caught by bystanders
>Let off the hook because affluenza and "star swimmer"
>Judge who let him off with only 6 months is about to lose his job

Sources. Better be good shit too.
If we're talking CONVICTED KILLERS vs CONVICTED RAPISTS then it's irrelevant, Brock is not a convicted rapist or even factually a rapist.

Besides, I'm guessing killers have a MUCH lower chance of being given the OPPORTUNITY to re-offend.

Not really.

You're drunk. You think shes consenting. You can't tell the difference, because you're drunk.

The only suspicious part of this case is that he ran away, but you don't know what he thought when those two guys yelled at him.

Two guys NATURALLY assume sexual assault.

HEY FUCKER WHAT ARE YOU DOING THERE

An aggressive demeanour makes the drunk "rapist" run away.

As far as her story?
She has a boyfriend. There are oppression points for being raped.

So.. shes incentivised to embellish or say she didn't give consent. Even if she remembers saying to the guy "lets go somewhere together" and thats literally the last thing she can remember - shes not going to admit that. Because it's "cooler" to slam the kid.

So did she consent before or after she layed down unconscious on the ground outside behind a dumpster?

So now everyone with a "rapist face" should get locked up?
I think some Germans tried somthing like that once or twice... Didn't pan out very well.

So you're saying it's way too harsh? If you got into a barfight and killed the guy you'd probably get manslaughter.

Regardless of this case, I think we can all agree that rape coverage needs to not name the defendant until it has been ruled guilty, and false rape charges needs to be punished more.