Can we have a forceful/rape thread
Can we have a forceful/rape thread
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
I never noticed the shoe of the creeper. He's obviously older, professional.. a teacher or principal?
The pic is both sexy and funny.
Lol no
NO
>tfw no masculine user to rape me
How big of a slut do you have to be when your subconscious makes you super slutty in everyday situations
That isn't her subconscious. She's doing it on purpose.
She's in heat.
In nature, its a posture called "presenting"
>tfw no submissive slutty user to rape
Life is hell
...
...
that's the spirit!
...
...
Also the grease stain on his knee. However we cant all pretend like a 15-18 year old ass isn't good lookin. Dont judge him too bad.
Fuck me that place is messy, dude probably doesn't even wash his dick if he even showers on a regular basis. Imagine the ingrown smell in that room
As opposed to an unforceful rape thread?
>department of redundancy department, how may I direct your call?
This is the mind of someone who doesn't get their dick sucked.
You would know.
Yeah, I study virgins for my PhD.
en.wikipedia.org
If you believe in evolution and naturalism, with no divine judge of right and wrong; and you think that rape is wrong on a "moral" level, then you're a hypocrite.
Mother Nature rewards the males who rape, cheat and steal as much as they can get away with.
Bump
Not if you believe that natural objective morals arise from societies. We see conserved moral norms across many groups.
Little off topic but love the idea of freeuse. Others?
Mother nature rewards stealing too, and almost everything else that's considered "wrong on a 'moral' level." If it didn't it wouldn't need to be 'immoral.' Poking your own eyes out with a stick is bad but not beneficial so it's just inadvisable rather than immoral.
yet for some reason morals have arisen to somewhat be part of one's brain
anyone have moar of op?
Stealing is good for one person but prisoner's-dilemma-style, it's best for everyone collectively if no one does. It's the general basis of most morals. It sucks to get robbed. It sucks to get raped. If you want to just follow the things your brain stem tells you rather than higher order thinking, (which I'm pretty sure is part of the brain) get off Sup Forums and go eat your cat
Both irrelevant since they can be dismissed as "spooks" in a naturalistic concept. In short, if one accepts only the existence of material matter there is absolutely no REASON to be intrinsically moral.
" The Age of Reason
by Thomas Paine
Paine wrote: "Of all the tyrannies that affect mankind, tyranny in religion is the worst; every other species of tyranny is limited to the world we live in; but this attempts to stride beyond the grave, and seeks to pursue us into eternity.""
There's no intrinsic reason to accept gravity exists - you only realize it when you jump out of a tree.
source?