>beating up men is fine
>beating up women isn't
Beating up men is fine
It's A.
>prove me wrong
id rather fight a woman than a man
Wouldn't the gravitational pull of the Earth bring the ray into an orbiting path?
>not understanding why beating up the physically weak is bad
I bet you kick your dog
well that depends on what the gun is actually shooting
if it's really a laser, then A, but the beam would have spread out a little by the time it leaves the atmosphere
Depends on the velocity.
???
Correct answer
>if it's really a laser, then A
>implying photons aren't affected by gravity
That's not the question I was asking shitfucks.
Hah
Then fucking stay weak and stop shoving 'muh stronk indipindint women whu donneed no mang' shut into movies
fuck off faggot
Either beating up both is fine, or beating up both isn't fine. This is true equality, ladies and gentlemen.
light doesn't have mass so gravity won't affect the ray
Then use a different image to open your discussion, cunt.
Earth's gravity isn't strong enough to bend light, so A is the right answer.
>t. Isaac Newton
Are we sure it's a laser? Could be a projectile firing weapon like a railgun.
What are we living on a black hole?
>light doesn't have mass so gravity won't affect the ray
I just clicked a random image on my reaction folder so fuck you.
Never post an image more interesting than your text.
fucking retard
>inb4 OP wanted us to talk about the image all along
He was, don't be naive
...
Bang
>Gravity doesn't affect light
This is bait right?
>insufficient data
>need properties of the weapon
If it was B then I would be able to see you touching yourself right now OP.
He's fucking right you mongo's
Gravity affects space-time which in turn affects the ray by proxy. Gravity doesn't directly influence the ray.
...
>Gravity affects space-time
He's going all out.
This.
he's right honey
I don't know, do photons have mass?
He really, really isn't.
Fag.
Thanks for the derail, op.
photons aren't real
Photons does't have mass. It's A.
>Gravity affects space-time which in turn affects the moon by proxy. Gravity doesn't directly influence the moon.
explain why large masses bend light then?
the real question is - what is the mass of the body the photon is being shot by.
Sup Forums fucked for anything science ever. typical cukservative faggots
how can photons be real if our eyes aren't real
Physical fortitude and self-dependency are two completely different things.
czechd
look how fast that ray of light is going. It will be affected very little if at all by earths gravity.
read this
nice argument nigger
Not my fault you failed physics.
Cool story reddit
If you hit a woman once she will die
what chinese cartoon is that cute nip nap from
Yuru Yuri
thanks famalam. Man I'm just getting dubs all over the place
Depends on velocity. It will inevitably curve under Earth's gravity, but how noticeable is not established.
Also, I think without extra meanuevering it can't really enter proper orbit, but I'm not sure.
uh, equality is equality
ask any woman if they think getting raped after your city is conquered during a war is worse than being a soldier in a war. every single one...
wow you're a cowsrd. lol
>light doesn't have mass
We've known light has mass for MORE THAN A CENTURY at this point, nimrod.
Wrong dipshit
Why do you think we say "light" when we mean the opposite of heavy?
Photons travel at the speed of light, which is much, much faster than the escape-velocity of the planet Earth.
It's A, with the understanding that the curvature of A is simply too slight to be seen in the graphic. The more the mass of the earth increases the more the curvature of space makes the path of the laser appear to curve from a third party perspective (although it remains straight in reality). A for an earth with a realistic mass, B for an earth with a mass great enough to cause sufficient curvature to "bend" the light in the illustrated path.
Hey Newt, there was this guy named Einstein who came after you...
>light doesn't have mass
Yes it does.
In fact, the island of Manhattan actually weighs about 300 lb.s in total more on a sunny day than it does on a cloudy night due to the increase in that many square miles being bombarded by photons, which impart their momentum, which is a quality of mass.
I am not bullshitting here. This is 100% true.
The answer is A, because impulsive force (of the Earth's gravity) is dependent on time, and light moves so fast that the impulse that gravity can impart on the photon before it moves away is basically nothing.
That's not mass doing that m8
In reality? A.
But this is textbook gravitational lensing. As the mass of the earth increases the graph starts to look more and more like B.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Is that with whatever the median rain fall's weight was removed?
It will only look like B beyond the event horizon of a black hole
Exactly.
Which is why the first guy is wrong. Gravity is the result of mass warping space-time. Read a book.
That's the best part of Deadpool. Him punching Asian women (who are fighting back) and he's all like "Is it sexist if I don't hit you?! Is it sexist if I do?!!!"
You can't impart momentum if you don't have mass, shithead.
Gravity affects light, just look at black holes.
escape velocity of earth
11,200 m/s
speed of light:
299,792,458 m/s
Tangentially related to OP, but you guys should play a fun game about gravity.
Also this. Basically the same as that one but more gamey.
You can't impart a post without sounding like a massive fag
There is literally no possible way to even stretch this thread as being related to television or film.
At least with the thinly veiled lets fap to this hot starlet threads it's--you know--thinly veiled