Go ahead Sup Forums answer it

go ahead Sup Forums answer it


....im waiting

2, 3, 1

2,1,3

2
3
1

They all go at the same time.

2,3,1

Nope, 1 has to yield to 2 & 3

2 3 and then 1, unless 3 is a bmw driving wanker then 3 would chop 2 off for a massive bloodbath with many casualties and 1 would have everything on camera therefore his life would be over with him showing the same footage in endless court battles

321

EASY 2,3,1

3-2-1

t intersection so through traffic has the right of way. 2,3,1

lol faggot, it is 2 then 3 then 1.
hope you don't drive.

checked, checked and checked

bmw wankers have moved to audi 5 years ago.

You either know the rules or you don't.
This is not a trick question.

If 2 and 3 go first then 1 is yielding to 2 and 3. 231 is right

Floor it?

audi would be a "4" stuck to any of those bumpers

If this involves New Jersey drivers, 3 makes a left turn right in front of 1, forcing him to slam on his brakes.

2, 3, 1. In America at least.

2,3,1
2 Doesn't lane change when he continues straight. 3 has the right of way over 1 since 1 crosses 3's path if he wasn't turning.

Post your homework results when you get it back.

correct. Person turning left always has right of way. This is definitely the law most idiots driving do not know though.

holy shit they are all driving on the wrong side of the road

231

Whoever gets there first

Look at this idiot.

It's also because 3 doesn't have a yield sign

the one turning left gives the way on a priority road you fucknugget, "2" would just braketest the whole traffic to let some wanker turn left then? fuck me who gave you the licence

lol. its really a shame how easy it is to get your license

whoever is more aggressive goes first

wrong. 3 is crossing a lane of traffic, therefore he has right of way. Its pretty clearly written in the lawbook.

I can't tell what sign 2 has.

What planet are you from, mate?

youre right actually. I misread the picture. If 2 was turning right id be correct though.

3 is crossing a lane of traffic therefore must wait for traffic to go past, then after 2 has cleared the road he is free to go, then 1 can go as well given 3 is no more an obstacle "right hand rule" at least in europe, maybe in 'murica 3 would go first in his vee8 moudour

How many crashes have you been involved in?

see

It's 1 2 3 you fucking idiots. No one else is present, first come, first serve.

3, 1, 2 in America

Fuck you foreigners

underrated post

even if 2 is turning right, 3 must wait the same way, fucking hell how many people you've killed in roads?

2, 3, 1

231

whichever car I am driving.

you fucking retards, its 3, person to the right always goes first

3 has a priority from the perspective of 1, yes, but not 2

That would still be wrong. If 2 were turning right, 3 would still have to wait. A car making a left (3) always has to yield to oncoming traffic.

morons. 2 goes first

Depends on your location

2, 3, 1, unless they're asian. Then they all go at the same time.

So 3 gets to cut right in front of 1 and force 1 to slam on his brakes?

No. Cars turning left have to yield to oncoming traffic.

German here. 2 3 1, someone who turn left is subordinated

3 1 2

whoever has no car on their right side goes first

i hope i'll never come across to one of you...
theres a clear sign

amerifags can't drive

All 3 at same time, but watch out

as long as 2 isn't at some kind of european stop sign (looks like a hand facing palm out), it's 2-3-1.

If 2 is at some kind of foreign stop sign, it's 3,1,2

over meemed upboat
no one gives a fuck if you recognize le epic maymay reference lad, get over yourself

I see you've driven in China before

Texas: Whoever has the biggest tires on their truck.

trumpfags really are this dumb